building fire in madrid proves 911 hoax...

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:23 pm

Freakaloin wrote:cuz the core is in the middle...where the planes never hit...dumbass..

yes but you see flames come out the other side of the building

damage is caused

unless fire took a detour around the core and come out the otherside

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:26 pm

the building were designed to take the impact of jumbo jets..

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/design.html

the core is in the middle...the planes went thru side of the buildings that are connected...not one side...thru the core and out the other...

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:27 pm

most engineers and architects outside of the us don't believe the official us version of the collpases...i wonder why?

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:28 pm

you said the core wasnt damaged when i said it was because you could see it go clear through the building

i didnt say about how far the planes penetrated the building

as for the designing

i thought the titanic was designed not to sink ?

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:31 pm

hey dumbo...NOONE who is in a position to know thinks the planes hitting the buildings caused the collapses...it was the jet fuel they claim that brought the buildings down...

i'll say it again since u want to think something that no one in the world with a brain believes...

the buildings were designed to withstand the impact of jumbojets...

no steel skyscraper has ever collapsed from fire before 911...and there have been bigger fires before..

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysi ... fires.html

why so ready to beleieve george bush and company?

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:33 pm

losCHUNK wrote:
as for the designing

i thought the titanic was designed not to sink ?

no man that was just hype...ships made like the titanic today(with that kind of flympsy steel...even for that time) would not even pass inspection...

and the core was intact or the building would have fallen immediately...and no one eccept u is disputing if they were still intact...

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:35 pm

and i said the planes mustve weakened the structure, you seen the fucking hole

the fire probaly brought it down

and like i said, when the supports gave way holding the top half up the building had no option but to give in

im probaly wrong but the fact is no one can calculate the damage caused when the building was nothing but a pile of steel by the time the day ended

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:36 pm

Freakaloin wrote:
losCHUNK wrote:
as for the designing

i thought the titanic was designed not to sink ?
no man that was just hype...ships made like the titanic today(with that kind of flympsy steel...even for that time) would not even pass inspection...

and the core was intact or the building would have fallen immediately...and no one eccept u is disputing if they were still intact...

yer and im sure in 70 yrs time building like ours wont even pass inspection and the WTC the un planeable building was just hype and myth

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:37 pm

Freakaloin wrote:
why so ready to beleieve george bush and company?

i aint, im just not ready to believe that the building is proof that the WTC's shoudlve held, TBH i couldnt give a fuck if the building was pulled or not

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:46 pm

yeah dude...ppl can calculate and have calculated damage...they could have done alot more, but for some reason the govt had all the rubble destroyed before investigators were allowed to check it...which is against the law btw...

u obviously don't know how those towers were designed...

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:49 pm

yeah the fire was so bad...ppl came out of the holes and started waving and shit...wow what a horrible fire...

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:50 pm

i dont give a fuck, let me put a hole in your skull and see if you still stand

and no, they dont, they dunno what damage the plane caused because they werent there to insepect it

and taking the shit off and having it destroyed isnt proof... an im not even arguing that because like i said, i dun gve a shit if they were pulled but that building in madrid does not prove that these 2 towers should still be standing

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:51 pm

Freakaloin wrote:yeah the fire was so bad...ppl came out of the holes and started waving and shit...wow what a horrible fire...

[img]pic[/img]

its probaly because the fire was in the core of the building :icon19:

or maybe the side which the plane crashed into

or is that the side ? either way so?

just proves my points correct and im smarter than those people who say it was casued by the fire :icon19:

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:51 pm

losCHunk loves george bush...lol

lookie at that pic again..theres a second person...lol what a fire...

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:53 pm

so ur saying the fire didn't want to burn cumbustible stuff and only wanted to burn the steel...lol gg

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:53 pm

actually i hate GWB, i rooted for kerry, but your a fucking moron and probaly believes anything that is directed to fuck up GWB's rep

Post by **inphlict** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:53 pm

Why is this in General Discussion?

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:55 pm

the planes barely damaged the MUCH weaker exoskeleton...look many of the beams are still intact at the impact site... the much stronger core which is in the center of the building that wasn't even touched was completely destroyed...lol gg

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:55 pm

inphlict wrote:Why is this in General Discussion?

why do u care...u pretenting u wanna be a mod?

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:55 pm

Freakaloin wrote:so ur saying the fire didn't want to burn cumbustible stuff and only wanted to burn the steel...lol gg

you said yourself you couldt see the fire and i cant imagine all that plane fuel heating up to fuck knows what and going out like a flash light

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:57 pm

yer, where the wings hit, but you also cant see any plane wreckage which means it is deeper inside the building

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:57 pm

lo. ur a moron...read the analysis on this page and see what u think...then read the official explanations and their sources of info and its obvious ur a moron...

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysi ... erity.html

Post by **Freakaloin** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:59 pm

deeper inside the building? the planes went in then came out the other side...most of the fuel either burned outside the building or burned inside the building away from the core...at least this is what the official us position is...

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 6:00 pm

shit like this always has biast opinions and explanations, which is why i dnt give a shit if they were pulled or not because we'll never know

Post by **losCHUNK** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 6:00 pm

Freakaloin wrote:deeper inside the building? the planes went in then came out the other side...most of the fuel either burned outside the building or burned inside the building away from the core...at least this is what the official us position is...

so they went through the core of the building ?