QuakeCon is go

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Turbanator
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am

Re: QuakeCon is go

Post by Turbanator »

that's definately cg :)
Turbanator
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am

Re: QuakeCon is go

Post by Turbanator »

wow.... (after watching the demo)
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: QuakeCon is go

Post by obsidian »

Eraser wrote:I'm afraid that this means that id Software's history of releasing game engine code to the public domain has ended right there.
I don't think so. They typically release the game engine code at the end-of-life of the engine so I don't see why they wouldn't be able to release the id Tech 5 code when they eventually have id Tech 6 around the corner. They did the same with id Tech 3 when id Tech 4 was introduced. Just because they are limiting engine licensing to Bethesda published games doesn't mean they can't release the source code when they are done with it.

They are still "licensing" their engines, you just have to sign a contract to have Bethesda publish your game. I guess it's a good package deal if you are an unattached game development studio, but not good if you are already part of Activision or Ubisoft, etc. (though unlikely that anyone already under contract with those publishers would be able to license the engine from id Software anyway).

Eraser wrote:rofl, Carmack's wife bought him a Tesla Roadster for his birthday. Awesome wife.
Sweet! It's probably mostly his money anyway. I wonder if he's going to tinker with it like he did with his Ferrari. Maybe borrow a few things from Armadillo Aerospace. :paranoid:
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: QuakeCon is go

Post by Don Carlos »

Turbanator wrote:wow.... (after watching the demo)
We need to talk fuck stick >:E
Where were you when the West was defeated?
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/doncarlos83][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/gbar/doncarlos83.gif[/img][/url]
DRuM
Posts: 6841
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 8:00 am

Re: QuakeCon is go

Post by DRuM »

Well well, Rapha dethroned.

The most epic grand final ever. Hub Aero was absolutely incredible, really fast all the way and some unbelievable rails. Cooller was down a lot of frags and brought it back to 6-6.

He'd already won two maps and was now at championship point and 7-6 would have given him the title, but somehow, Cypher, in the second lot of overtime, turned it around and won it by a massive margin taking it to the 5th and final map which Cooller started off well in with the first frag, but eventually lost. So unlucky. I was rooting for him, yet he still has never won a quakecon in over 10 years of playing quake :(

And battleforge (which Cooller ragequit on less than half way through) is a bit shit, hopefully they'll drop it next year.
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Re: QuakeCon is go

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

DRuM wrote:
And battleforge (which Cooller ragequit on less than half way through) is a bit shit, hopefully they'll drop it next year.
This.
losCHUNK
Posts: 16019
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 7:00 am

Re: QuakeCon is go

Post by losCHUNK »

Memphis wrote:why the smeg does steam have a week long quakecon sale, yet we can't play quake live on steam? /huff



edit: tbh if i could hop in and out of quake games via my steam friends list, i'd probably actually play it
:up:
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
prince1000
Posts: 1892
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2001 8:00 am

Re: QuakeCon is go

Post by prince1000 »

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
DRuM wrote:
And battleforge (which Cooller ragequit on less than half way through) is a bit shit, hopefully they'll drop it next year.
This.
have you even dueled on it more than once or twice and learned the layout? it's not shit but does need to be re-worked some. just because cooller is shit at the map (probably played it a handful of times prior) doesn't make the map shit. if czm was still playing w/practice, he would have made everyone look silly on hub, like he had for the previous decade.
axbaby
Posts: 3424
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 1999 8:00 am

Re: QuakeCon is go

Post by axbaby »

AmIdYfReAk wrote:
xer0s wrote:Yeah, it's something I'll always regret, considering it's only a 3.5 hour drive for me...
25 hours from here...

Wasnt it something silly like 3 days for AX?
5 day's to get to Quakecon .. Yellowknife to Texas
Wish you could have come with us AmoodyFreak.
If i ever find myself across the ocean with time to spare i will go again in a minute.
[color=#FF0000][WYD][/color]
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: QuakeCon is go

Post by Don Carlos »

I think we should have a Q3W meet up next year. I'm trying to get turn to go back and I think I will defiantly be up for it :)
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19175
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: QuakeCon is go

Post by Eraser »

defiantly eh?
axbaby
Posts: 3424
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 1999 8:00 am

Re: QuakeCon is go

Post by axbaby »

too bad we may not get Rage till after Quakecon next year but who knows id may surprise the Quakecon visitors.
[color=#FF0000][WYD][/color]
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: QuakeCon is go

Post by Don Carlos »

They will have it playable next year...or at least a multiplayer demo out for us to have a of :)
DRuM
Posts: 6841
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 8:00 am

Re: QuakeCon is go

Post by DRuM »

prince1000 wrote:
have you even dueled on it more than once or twice and learned the layout? it's not shit but does need to be re-worked some. just because cooller is shit at the map (probably played it a handful of times prior) doesn't make the map shit.
To be fair I haven't even played on it once, but it just didn't look very interesting to spectate. I suppose I'd appreciate the map more if I learned it, yea.
prince1000
Posts: 1892
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2001 8:00 am

Re: QuakeCon is go

Post by prince1000 »

DRuM wrote:
prince1000 wrote:
have you even dueled on it more than once or twice and learned the layout? it's not shit but does need to be re-worked some. just because cooller is shit at the map (probably played it a handful of times prior) doesn't make the map shit.
To be fair I haven't even played on it once, but it just didn't look very interesting to spectate. I suppose I'd appreciate the map more if I learned it, yea.
most @ qcon with the exception of dahang and stermy had barely even practiced it. from what i've heard, their match on it was much more interesting than the other 2 matches that were played in their entirety on it. i haven't seen the match but i have played it about a dozen times myself and do like it, though agree with most of the complaints about it's current state and the changes that need to be made.
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Re: QuakeCon is go

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

prince1000 wrote: have you even dueled on it more than once or twice and learned the layout? it's not shit but does need to be re-worked some. just because cooller is shit at the map (probably played it a handful of times prior) doesn't make the map shit. if czm was still playing w/practice, he would have made everyone look silly on hub, like he had for the previous decade.
I have dueled on it several times because I was trying to figure it out and I don't care for it because it does need to be reworked, which probably won't happen, so my previous statement still stands.
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Re: QuakeCon is go

Post by Geebs »

Lol at the massive amount of nerd rage that Carmack dared to showcase his tech on an iPhone.
Dark Metal
Posts: 5496
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2000 8:00 am

Re: QuakeCon is go

Post by Dark Metal »

Excuse me, but are we talking about Quake?
[WYD]
Post Reply