Quake3World

Thanks. I couldn't find an HD version when I looked earlier...

Looks completely fucking retarded. Bet the fifth thing is love, and it turns out she's actually been lobotomized all along.

Will still watch.

You soap-opera-watching-mofos!

GONNAFISTYA wrote:lol...so a pack of strippers are pissed off with their lives and create a fantasy world wherein they're ninjas?

What the fuck?

ya funny, i didn't see mazda there

SoM wrote:

GONNAFISTYA wrote:lol...so a pack of strippers are pissed off with their lives and create a fantasy world wherein they're ninjas?

What the fuck?

ya funny, i didn't see mazda there

That's because they aren't 'midget' stripper ninjas.

So they cut the film down to PG-13

FUCKING RUBBISH!!!!

Directors Cut FTMFW

Damn that sucks. Still a fun watch more than likely...

strangely attractive for a bunch of windowlickers

looks like a shutter island/watchmen/inception/buffy clusterfuck

bitWISE wrote:So they cut the film down to PG-13

Sauce?

what really blows my mind about Hollywood is how someone with imbecile ideas has access to such high end movie production resources. How does that happen?

it happens because movie-making is a business, and high-CGI low-brainer movies sell well

LawL wrote:Sauce?

http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php ... cker_punch

seremtan wrote:it happens because movie-making is a business, and high-CGI low-brainer movies sell well

I don't buy that, why can't they leave the action in and also add some substance? clearly they spent loads of money in the production...are writers that much more high priced than the rest of the production aspects to nearly completely dismiss them from the equation?

the "high-CGI low-brainer" only takes you so far, and movie reviews clearly show that a good story always wins, for both the critics and general viewers.
Cool CGI will only bring people in, but rest assured they wont leave happy...that's just not a good business model. No matter how you see it, a well rounded flick will have a much better return for their effort on so many diff. levels.

bitWISE wrote:

LawL wrote:Sauce?

http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php ... cker_punch

Gayer than Richard Simmons whacking off in a dildo forest while looking at a picture of Doombrain.

Tsakali wrote:that's just not a good business model.

apparently it is, or hollywood would have gone bankrupt years ago

While I think it's stupid, as I understand it they only cut a single scene where two characters get a little bit intimate with each other. I don't think it's a huge loss for the movie.

Eraser wrote:While I think it's stupid, as I understand it they only cut a single scene where two characters get a little bit intimate with each other. I don't think it's a huge loss for the movie.

America, where 14-year-olds are allowed to watch someone dipped into an acid bath and melt thereafter, but god forbid they see something which might look like sex.

'nuff said

Eraser wrote:While I think it's stupid, as I understand it they only cut a single scene where two characters get a little bit intimate with each other. I don't think it's a huge loss for the movie.

I think it's more along the lines of us expecting it to be an over-the-top R rated movie from the start. Like finding out a new horror movie is PG13.

Eraser wrote:While I think it's stupid, as I understand it they only cut a single scene where two characters get a little bit intimate with each other. I don't think it's a huge loss for the movie.

Sauce for the sex scene being the only scene cut to make PG13?

I enjoyed it quite a bit. But then I have terrible taste in movies so I have no idea what is generally accepted as "good".

Holy teal and orange, batman.