Page 2 of 4
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:05 pm
by seremtan
DukeNukem#3 wrote:Semencan has been stalking me.

Good thing facebook hasn't reset my picture security settings, otherwise he'd have another jizz covered sock in the laundry.
i thought "only a moron would fall for this"
i was right
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:30 pm
by DukeNukem#3
Unless you've got some sort of logical reason for being annoyed by my posts, then you're just the same asshole you were when I left. In which case, why would I care if you read my posts or not? Also, you're not exactly going to fix a person's annoying nature unless you tell them what's up. Blindness has nothing to do with it; this may be the first forum I set foot in, but its also the only one where people have been bothered by my presence. Now I suppose you could have a good reason for being annoyed by my return, but more than likely, you're just riding along with the "Oh its Duke, I'm going to do the same thing I did last time because its our thing." reason. Which is no real reason at all.
Now I know when I came here ages ago and when I left I acted like a complete retard. Hell I started out like this was some role-playing shit. When Quake 3 hit the shelves I realized that I needed internet access to continue my gaming experience, so coming here was also my first real exposure to what is now basic internet culture. I didn't know what I was doing, and I didn't figure it out until I joined forums with people who are just nicer in general.
So, you can either explain to me what is bothering you, so I can stop doing that shit, or you can eat a bucket of dicks.
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:36 pm
by DukeNukem#3
seremtan wrote:DukeNukem#3 wrote:Semencan has been stalking me.

Good thing facebook hasn't reset my picture security settings, otherwise he'd have another jizz covered sock in the laundry.
i thought "only a moron would fall for this"
i was right
I see a facebook link with a large profile number attached to it and because I don't immediately realize it's a loopback I'm retarded? I sincerely hope you don't work in some sort of supervisory position. I'd imagine working for you would be like watching the office, only this time its not funny its just sad.
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:45 pm
by EtUL
tl;dr
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:11 pm
by DukeNukem#3
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:12 pm
by seremtan
DukeNukem#3 wrote:I see a facebook link with a large profile number attached to it and because I don't immediately realize it's a loopback I'm retarded? I sincerely hope you don't work in some sort of supervisory position. I'd imagine working for you would be like watching the office, only this time its not funny its just sad.
as opposed to thinking i would waste my time stalking some internet moron whose existence i'd totally forgotten about until he turned up again one day in a whirlwind of flailing spasticity?

Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:26 pm
by DukeNukem#3
seremtan wrote:DukeNukem#3 wrote:I see a facebook link with a large profile number attached to it and because I don't immediately realize it's a loopback I'm retarded? I sincerely hope you don't work in some sort of supervisory position. I'd imagine working for you would be like watching the office, only this time its not funny its just sad.
as opposed to thinking i would waste my time stalking some internet moron whose existence i'd totally forgotten about until he turned up again one day in a whirlwind of flailing spasticity?

Heh, dude, if someone were to ask you why you thought I was a moron, and to explain that answer, you wouldn't be able to do it.
Oh and if you call being surprised that this place still exists (barely, considering it remains so only due to the generosity of a person who has not posted in quite some time. He is probably out doing something productive with his life.) a whirlwind of "spasticity", then you my friend have much bigger mental problems to deal with.
So let me try to use as few words here as possible so you can understand: If you have had the time to waste 8 years of your life on this forum of all places, then it would be perfectly logical to assume that maybe you do have the time to look up my profile on facebook for trolling purposes.
Shame, had you been less retarded about it I might have congratulated you on a trolling well done.

Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 7:39 pm
by shaft
I give this guy a week, TOPS.
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:03 pm
by 4days
DukeNukem#3 wrote:blah filler waffle even the colour is boring
if he's gotten you to make another lengthy defensive post (he has) where you lie about working on a stupid assumption instead of failing at common sense (you did) then it was a good troll and made you look like a flailing spastic (it has).
if you could congratulate him using less than 3 paragraphs that'd be fantastic.
SO LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT ... If you cross the North Korean border illegally, you get 12 yrs. hard labor. If you cross the Afghanistan border illegally, you get shot. Two Americans just got eight years for crossing the Iranian border. If you cross the UK border illegally you get a job, a drivers license, food stamps 4 tesco, a place to live, health care, housing & child benefits, education, & a tax free business for 7 yrs ...No wonder we are a country in debt. Re-post if you agree.

this girl has lovely big milky-white tits that jiggle hypnotically when she laughs, but she's such a fucking moron. is there a setting with lists or something where you don't have to see people's posts but you can still creepily browse their holiday photos?
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:05 pm
by seremtan
DukeNukem#3 wrote:...as few words here as possible...
tl;dr
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:09 pm
by seremtan
4days wrote:...lovely big milky-white tits... such a fucking moron....
this kind of combo should be against nature, but somehow isn't
like, there's this really fit brunette at my work who could make a mint if she took her clothes off for the camera, but she's denser than a skip full of concrete bowling balls. we call her the oreo: brunette on the outside, blonde on the inside
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:21 pm
by andyman
who's mad?
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:11 pm
by seremtan
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 2:39 am
by andyman
Due to "lack of room", NYC Police Officers, Port Authority Police Officers and FDNY Firefighters are not "invited" to the 10th anniversary of 9/11 at Ground Zero. Funny - they weren't invited on that day in 2001, either - they just "showed up" and became our heroes. Please re-post if you think they belong MORE than the politicians who are invited
holy wildfire...
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 3:00 am
by andyman
I need your help!! Just so everyone is aware..... the "rapper" Soulja Boy has released a new song that includes the phrase "F* CK THE ARMY TROOPS" he continues on to say how "hard" and "real" he is and how "fake" we(VETS ) are. I am going to test the power of social networking and see if this reaches him, but anytime he wants to defend that statement I know a lot of people who would gladly oblige. Do me a favor..(repost )Military and civilian
it's ok to rap about killing cops though.

Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:39 am
by Eraser
4days wrote:is there a setting with lists or something where you don't have to see people's posts but you can still creepily browse their holiday photos?
There is actually. Hover over one of her posts and click the X at the right top and choose to ignore all of this user's posts. She won't end up in your feed anymore but you can still view the profile.
Only problem with this is that if a friend replies to one of her posts, then the post still ends up in your feed under the guise of "your friend replied to this".
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:40 am
by Eraser
andyman wrote:Due to "lack of room", NYC Police Officers, Port Authority Police Officers and FDNY Firefighters are not "invited" to the 10th anniversary of 9/11 at Ground Zero. Funny - they weren't invited on that day in 2001, either - they just "showed up" and became our heroes. Please re-post if you think they belong MORE than the politicians who are invited
holy wildfire...
Not enough room? Why? I'm pretty sure there's about two skyscrapers of room now?

Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 2:50 pm
by xer0s
Too soon...
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 4:14 pm
by Tsakali
more like too late
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 10:36 pm
by DukeNukem#3
4days wrote:
if he's gotten you to make another lengthy defensive post (he has) where you lie about working on a stupid assumption instead of failing at common sense (you did) then it was a good troll and made you look like a flailing spastic (it has).
if you could congratulate him using less than 3 paragraphs that'd be fantastic.
Lengthy is subjective, I would consider a page or more to be lengthy. Not realizing that a completely arbitrary profile number is a facebook loopback is not retarded, it's misinformed. Now if the link had 127.0.0.1 or /home or /wall perhaps then it would be retarded and a mistake of common sense. It's also well outside the realm of a retarded assumption because lots of people have issue with me and if someone actually did that I wouldn't be the least bit surprised. Now If I'm supposed to know that right away, it doesn't make me look like a spastic, it makes you look like you have no life because you know what the loopback profile number on some website is.
Have I responded defensively to his post? yes you've got me on that. Is my previous assumption stupid or failing at common sense...well only if this was the facebook developers forum and we both worked there. We do not and you are wrong; I can't lie about making a retarded assumption I did not make. Telling me that has made me look like a flailing spastic, when anyone who doesn't know what that profile number is, would have fallen for it the first time, is in-and-of-itself retarded, especially when those who did not have profiles simply said they could not see what the link led to.
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 10:46 pm
by andyman
but everyone on this forum knows that link and that the obvious troll is obvious
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:17 pm
by DukeNukem#3
andyman wrote:but everyone on this forum knows that link and that the obvious troll is obvious
I just came back, I didn't remember you either. I think I left before facebook was around. So now I know. I learned something, thank you.
Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:30 pm
by seremtan
DukeFukushima#3

Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:41 pm
by DukeNukem#3
I'd rather die of radiation than AIDS semencan.

Re: Facebookonomics
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:44 pm
by andyman