Quake3World

Good thing the games are made by Ubisoft then

Seriously though, you are doing yourself a huge disservice by not playing AC2 and AC:B

Ah, i am confused about two things i see, indeed Ubisoft is the target of my rage and also it was AC2 that i played, not the first.

I'll consider picking 3 up in a sale if i see one tbh, i quite enjoyed the whole climbing stabbing running stuff and i read somewhere the savegame thingie is much better. Just pissed me off so much that it deleted my save, never found the will or the energy to start over

I think it looks great. So they went and mixed it up a bit... Shocking. Its almost as if after what, five games, not counting the other mobile and console versions, they went for something a little different...

But I'm betting if this was just AC2 in a new city, like the last few, people would be up in arms?

Yeah, its daft. Yeah, its got a lot of issues... Hell I watched the trailer and he came off looking less "assassin" and more "murderer". Yeah, it annoys me that he nevr seems to stain his lovely white clothes... But jesus fuck, its a game, have a little fun, eh? Lets leave the bullshit at the door gents.

GKY's pic was spot on. Its retarded. But then, no less retarded than everything else. As a guy who LOVED the first, but gave up half way into the second because it was more of the same and never even bothered with the others, this one has my interest. Why? Because its different enough to look like I should give it a go.

Don't cry hate until the series reaches Bomberman Zero levels of stupidity. Until then, just have a bloody laugh, you bunch of slack jawed faglets.

Ryoki wrote:i read somewhere the savegame thingie is much better. Just pissed me off so much that it deleted my save, never found the will or the energy to start over

Not sure what your problem with save games was, but a savegame getting lost or corrupt is obviously an incident that shouldn't have happened. While it's frustrating, it shouldn't cloud your judgment of the games, because especially brotherhood is a very well made game.

I think what fueled my anger was the fact that it was a retarded DRM related issue, originally you had to be online in order for the game to be able to save. The PC player community thought this was completely ridiculous and there was much fan outrage at the time it came out, it didn't take long for Ubi to patch it. Thing is, they patched it wrong and there were loads of people who inexplicably lost their savegames at some point. As far as i could tell they never bothered to fix it particular issue either, since it only affected something like 10% of the total player base. Which is still a huge number of people... for laughs, google something like "AC2 deleted save" and be amazed at how many people got upsetted.

Really enjoyable game though, i agree. It's just that when you're almost done and you get to start all over again, it tends to be a little frustrating. Might replay one day though, dunno...

Just skip ahead to Brotherhood then.
Funny how you blamed this on consolitis while it's a PC problem pur sang.

Eraser wrote:Seems like gonnafatya is right after all. You cunts are already dismissing this game based on a single cinematic reveal trailer.

I wasn't really interested in the first place, unless that trailer had something jaw-droppingly awesome in it to pull me back in. I got my kicks from the first and it wore off halfway through the second. I never did finish it, but that may be because I only rented it.

Yes you feel addressed by my comment. Nagging conscience?

Eraser wrote:Just skip ahead to Brotherhood then.
Funny how you blamed this on consolitis while it's a PC problem pur sang.

Mmm, will probably do actually, hopefully it'll turn up in a sale sometime.

I called it a consoley problem because i love to blame consoles for my gaming woes... it's actually more of a DRM related issue i guess. *shrug*

Eraser wrote:Yes you feel addressed by my comment. Nagging conscience?

Cognitive dissonance.

new trailer

So now even Assassin's Creed has been turned into a pile of "hurr Amurrcuh fuck yeah freedom" nonsense. Pass

Captain Mazda wrote:So now even Assassin's Creed has been turned into a pile of "hurr Amurrcuh fuck yeah freedom" nonsense. Pass

As someone who is privy to the inner workings of the AC 3 story - and as a well-known murkuh basher - I can guarantee you are 100% incorrect. It's simply another setting and another historical timeframe in the ongoing story of the Templars vs the Assassins and their particular goals.

I guess you missed the little nuances in the trailer posted above. From the little messages I gathered, the Americans are brave and true and the American colonial flag is synonymous with liberty and justice, not to mention the main character now has a clean American accent for some reason. Wasn't he supposed to be Native?

Captain Mazda wrote:I guess you missed the little nuances in the trailer posted above.

I guess you missed the part that you were 100% incorrect. I could go ahead and destroy your dumb assumptions of the spirit of the game based on a trailer, but that'd just be mean.

Go ahead, I'll come and read it whenever I feel like having a laugh

I read this article on the PA Report about how in each AC game, every story-driven kill the protagonist (Altaïr or Ezio) makes is done in a way that it's historically accurate: the kill is made in the right place at the right time. I find the historical accuracy of AC2 and AC:B to be fascinating and it really got me interested in the whole Borgia family affair papacy thing.

The article also talks about how very few high profile people died during the American civil war so that this posed a problem. It sounded like they went for slightly less high profile assassination targets to be able to stay true to history. I'm afraid that this may make the game's historical setting somewhat less interesting.

Also, many of the buildings you climb in AC2 and ACB are real buildings that are world famous. How many buildings were there in America in that time era that are world famous now? Not many I think? So this all makes me worry that the setting will fail to impress me. I sincerely hope I'm wrong though.

lol

"lol" what?

Your "worries" about the game are so shallow it's not even worth arguing with you about the merits of them.

"I hope this game doesn't have too much of the colour blue in it."

I'll never forget when I first turned pro in the industry and read the forums for Far Cry...and realized just how fucking stupid people's complaints towards games are. Since then I've stopped caring about the whiners in our customer base.

I can't wait for the "you're a snob" comments...

If you made good games instead of shit ones like Far Cry people wouldn't complain.

ffs if you`re worried about exactly what building you`ll be jumping on and around when playing the game then how in the fuck do you think it`ll live up to expectations?

I`m not being a cunt, I`m pointing out in the simpilest terms that these types of complaints are retarded.

no they are not. Especially for a historically based game like AC... it's a big part of what people expect from this series. FFS stop being a callus cunt about shit and fuck.

Either way, I've already said I'm not gonna bother with this one, since I find american history as worthy of my attention as a special olympics gold medalist

GONNAFISTYA wrote:Your "worries" about the game are so shallow it's not even worth arguing with you about the merits of them.

"I hope this game doesn't have too much of the colour blue in it."

I'll never forget when I first turned pro in the industry and read the forums for Far Cry...and realized just how fucking stupid people's complaints towards games are. Since then I've stopped caring about the whiners in our customer base.

I can't wait for the "you're a snob" comments...

There's people here saying things like a game not being worth their money because the FOV is wrong and you're calling me shallow? Right.

The way the story is integrated into historical events is a huge part of the AC series. Sure, they may have nailed it on the head for this new game time, but I'm just not so sure the American civil war will appeal all that much to me. Because of the same reason I'm not as interested in AC1 or AC:Revelations. They are valid questions to ask. I'm not writing off the game, I'm just pondering how and if they can make AC3 as interesting from a historical POV as AC2/ACB. Also, I dont know how it's in the US, but here in the Netherlands we get barely any education on the subject of the US civil war.