Quake3World

LawL wrote:Unlike the many morons in this thread I'll decide if I like it or not after I've actually seen it.

If that approach includes your real life buddies, youre gonna end up watching a lot of arse

its all well n good not judging a book by its cover, but if someone stole that book and smeared shit over a few of the pages youre not gonna be impressed with the result wether youve read it or not, infact itll take reviews of biblical standards for me to pick up said book and trundle through someone elses chocolate logs

Cool story bro.

Reviews all pan it, will skip.

a thread on a dying 13 year old gaming forum said it sucked, so no thanks

murrrrrr（¯﹃¯）

LawL wrote:Unlike the many morons in this thread I'll decide if I like it or not after I've actually seen it.

Lol morons...

feedback wrote:murrrrrr（¯﹃¯）

rummmmmm =(0_o)=

I like how Hollywood regurgitates shit instead of coming up with new ideas

seremtan wrote:fffffuuuuu-

just watched that again a couple of days ago. it's the Duke, A-number-one, and in no need of a remake

LawL wrote:Cool story bro.

ya think ?, then you may like it, guess someone has to

The idea of doing a remake of anything is not wrong; the trouble is Hollywood continue to prove that they have absolutely no fucking idea how to do one that isn't shit. Most of the time they can hardly even muster a sequel that isn't pale in comparison to the original. People continue to ignore reviews and buy Hollywood's shit. Until people realise that if reviewers are saying something stinks, it most likely stinks and they should not pay to sniff at it, Hollywood will continue to churn out the shit and films will only get stinkier and stinkier. Stuff is supposed to be improved as time goes on, not made progressively worse and worse.

Top marks for missing the point of a review, LawL