Re: Frankenstein
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 12:00 pm
Technology wise
i could not agree more.Eraser wrote:The first was awesome, but after that, it went downhill quickly to be honest
Page 2 of 2
Re: Frankenstein
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 3:20 pm
Re: Frankenstein
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 4:37 pm
There is only ONE Matrix movie, and it isn't one of the sequels.
Re: Frankenstein
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 4:41 pm
There were sequels?
Re: Frankenstein
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 4:43 pm
GONNAFISTYA wrote:lol all of this reminds me of a seasonal phenomenon known as "Fuck you. It's January" ©RedLetterMedia
It spells out how all the movies released in and around that time of year suck fat cock.
See?
We're fucked until April.
Re: Frankenstein
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:39 pm
Re: Frankenstein
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 6:36 pm
Looks completely uninteresting, but they totally made up for it with that über loud trailer music! 
Re: Frankenstein
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 6:36 pm
yes it wasRyoki wrote:Constantine was not watchable in the slightestseremtan wrote:Keanu Reeves hasn't made a watchable movie since Constantine
you're just wrong, that's all
Re: Frankenstein
Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2013 4:51 am
to bad he said no to constantine 2
prolly making man of tai chi 2
prolly making man of tai chi 2
Re: Frankenstein
Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2013 8:02 am
too
Re: Frankenstein
Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:25 pm
fuck u to