Quake3World

GONNAFISTYA wrote:I win. Where's my cookie?

probably in your fat, pudgy hand

GONNAFISTYA wrote: Gramps is the only "Q3W member" who's defending the right to own the implement needed to go on a killing spree, so he's therefore the most likely to actually do it.

I win. Where's my cookie?

Yes, that's clearly what I'm defending. Your comprehension abilities suck, as usual.

You always lose and you've likely already eaten all of the cookies.

lol fat jokes from the old ped0 and the red-dot redneck.

But you're fat, and stupid. So being called a cookie gorging moron fits you perfectly.

Holy shit. This argument again?

Question is which tactical weapon for the job?

YourGrandpa wrote:

Don Carlos wrote:You are absolutely, unequivocally more likely to shoot someone if you own a gun than if you don't.

You are absolutely, unequivocally more likely to run someone over with your car, stab someone with a knife, beat someone with a bat, electrocute someone with a toaster, burn someone with a can of gas, decapitate someone with a chainsaw, etcetera, etcetera, if you own one than if you don't. Ridiculous... Keep living in your fantasy land. Otherwise come up with a viable way to remove guns from the American society or shut up.

You are right. You are more like to run someone over if you own a car than if you don't.

I fail to see what you are getting at?

- yea but statistically you're more likely to run someone over with a car, why punish people who are responsible with guns ?

But cars have functional purposes where as guns are designed for killing

- Guns are designed for protection and its my right as a good american citizen to defend ma authoritah !

I just saved us 4 pages

Don Carlos wrote:I fail to see what you are getting at?

You don't "need" a car, knives, bats, toasters, containers of fuel or chainsaws. You couldn't possibly own them for anything other than killing. So ban them. They kill too many people. Just because you've never or will never kill/injure anyone with them, doesn't mean you can be trusted to responsibly own them. In fact, maybe we should take this a step further and convict you of the crimes that could be committed with those items. That way we prevent the crimes from ever happening...

Of course you don't get. You're incapable. So stop trying.

Ok the don't *need* a car is a new one, GG donny

When was the last time someone walked into a school and murdered a bunch of people with a toaster?

Why does that matter? More people get killed while misusing electrical appliances than with firearms. You don't "need" electrical appliances. So ban them.

Fuck man he's going medieval on your ass

More people die from toasters than guns according to Gramps.

I said electrical appliances.

You said toasters in your previous post then you said electrical appliances. So if you want to play that game then more people die from weapons than electrical appliances.

Some stats

[lvlshot]http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/6 ... ed_624.gif[/lvlshot]

People appear to be waking up though ?

[lvlshot]http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/6 ... ip_624.gif[/lvlshot]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-20759139

Just people like Gwamps still living with the fairies. We're also in a situation here where the 30% ish are forcing the wider majority in adopting their views ?. I think we should intervene.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/blogg ... 2203/posts

YourGrandpa wrote:...toasters... You couldn't possibly own them for anything other than killing...

LawL wrote:You said toasters in your previous post then you said electrical appliances. So if you want to play that game then more people die from weapons than electrical appliances.

I said people die by being electrocuted by toasters. I didn't say more people are killed by toasters than firearms. I did say that more people are killed by electrical appliances than firearms.

You need to work on your reading comprehension.

seremtan wrote:...toasters... You couldn't possibly own them for anything other than killing...

Sarcasm...

YourGrandpa wrote:

LawL wrote:You said toasters in your previous post then you said electrical appliances. So if you want to play that game then more people die from weapons than electrical appliances.

I said people die by being electrocuted by toasters. I didn't say more people are killed by toasters than firearms. I did say that more people are killed by electrical appliances than firearms.

You need to work on your reading comprehension.

He's saying either way it's bullshit, comprende ?

http://www.cpsc.gov//PageFiles/109822/electro.pdf

You lot have a decrease from 1.1 - 0.52 deaths per 1 million people between 1990-2000. The most you lot had was 700 in a year and that's total n all, not just consumer related. A rate like this would bring you well below the stats I mentioned above

edit: herpa derpa what about house fires from electrical appliances ?

U.S. fire departments responded to an estimated annual average of 47,820 reported home structure fires involving electrical failure or malfunction 2007-2011. These fires resulted in 455 civilian deaths

http://www.nfpa.org/safety-information/ ... n-the-home

Still nowhere near

Not to Brian. He's so thick his head is jealous.

[lvlshot]http://static.fjcdn.com/gifs/Don+t+look+under+your+bed+.+sub+for+more+funny+pics_d5d896_4361713.gif[/lvlshot]