Re: Fallout 4?...hmm maybe
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 7:20 pm
Fallout: Origins, by the way
teh fake
http://kotaku.com/looks-like-its-offici ... 1478408027
Page 2 of 2
Re: Fallout 4?...hmm maybe
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:24 am
Re: Fallout 4?...hmm maybe
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:18 am
Mega 
Fallout Origins is the next game, by the way
Fallout Origins is the next game, by the way
Re: Fallout 4?...hmm maybe
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 8:38 pm
That sucks...
Re: Fallout 4?...hmm maybe
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2013 2:59 pm
Fallout 4 confirmed. Will be set in Boston.
Re: Fallout 4?...hmm maybe
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2013 4:41 pm
Source?
Re: Fallout 4?...hmm maybe
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2013 5:01 pm
Me.
Re: Fallout 4?...hmm maybe
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2013 5:17 pm
Hmm, I gotta be honest. Boston seems like a bit of a boring location. I'd like to have seen a more rural area. They could have had some really interesting characters (think Trevor in GTAV). They've done big cities in the past. It's time to mix it up...
Re: Fallout 4?...hmm maybe
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2013 5:24 pm
Honestly I'm pretty much done with the engine and game mechanic bethesda's been whoring now for the last what? 10 years?
I thought fallout 3 was boring, NV, boring, skyrim boring. The only Bethesda game I enjoyed using that engine was Oblivion because it was new at the time.
I'm playing through Dishonored right now though and THAT is pretty interesting and fun.
I thought fallout 3 was boring, NV, boring, skyrim boring. The only Bethesda game I enjoyed using that engine was Oblivion because it was new at the time.
I'm playing through Dishonored right now though and THAT is pretty interesting and fun.
Re: Fallout 4?...hmm maybe
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2013 5:31 pm
Oblivion was a clunky pos, especially when compared to Skyrim. Those other games you found boring I enjoyed, apart from Skyrim, but that wasn't a boring world I just don't like the whole dungeons and dragons thing.
It didn't have any GTIs either
It didn't have any GTIs either
Re: Fallout 4?...hmm maybe
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2013 5:46 pm
I agree but it was first and it was fun for awhile. What I didn't like about fallout was the drab colours throughout the entire game. Yeah I get that's the look they were going for but ultimately for me it just painted the whole game in the same light. I can't really say why or what about it did this but it did.
I also have a dislike of any rpg that levels the creatures in the game along with your own level. I forget the term for this but it kills games as you never get a sense of being powerful once you reach those higher levels.
I'll still play skyrim once in awhile though when I'm sufficiently bored.
I also have a dislike of any rpg that levels the creatures in the game along with your own level. I forget the term for this but it kills games as you never get a sense of being powerful once you reach those higher levels.
I'll still play skyrim once in awhile though when I'm sufficiently bored.
Re: Fallout 4?...hmm maybe
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2013 5:56 pm
Makes sense...Κracus wrote:
I'll still play skyrim once in awhile though when I'm sufficiently bored.
Re: Fallout 4?...hmm maybe
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2013 5:59 pm
I dunno, yeah it's fun to explore the world but I'm just dissapointed in it because I'm not as enthralled in the game as I was with Oblivion. I spent hundreds of hours playing Obliv and a fraction of that in Skyrim.
I've easily put 300 hours or more though in Dark Souls... I'd be surprised if I had 40 hours in Skyrim even though I've created at least 5 characters, I just get bored and start over thinking another class might spice the game up a bit. btw fighter class sucks.
I've easily put 300 hours or more though in Dark Souls... I'd be surprised if I had 40 hours in Skyrim even though I've created at least 5 characters, I just get bored and start over thinking another class might spice the game up a bit. btw fighter class sucks.