Page 2 of 2

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 11:16 am
by mik0rs
Fuck no.

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 11:17 am
by mik0rs
And the fuck no was to that pic Brian Slade posted.

And for the record, Fay Wray looks like a munter too.

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 11:18 am
by Brian Slade
Cause Fay Wray is a Munter, a Dead one. :p

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 11:18 am
by Brian Slade
diego wrote:lol! beat me to it! :D
:p

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 12:26 pm
by MaCaBr3
You can spot Naomi Watt's cute face from miles away. I wub her.

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:44 pm
by Jackal
Pauly wrote:
dnoyc wrote:
glossy wrote:btw, the movie looks absolutely horrible
what do you expect it's by that fat retarded fuck peter jackson.
LOL.

Hey lets all knock Jackson because he made a very succesful trilogy. People. So predictable.

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 3:47 pm
by Don Carlos
Looks good i think :D

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 3:53 pm
by o'dium
*gets flash backs of godzilla*

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 3:53 pm
by Don Carlos
o'dium wrote:*gets flash backs of godzilla*
Godzilla looked shit and was...

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:05 pm
by dnoyc
sliver wrote:
dnoyc wrote:how about cuz he fucked up the one chance we're going to get in a long time at that trilogy?
You're a huge idiot.
dnoyc wrote:
Pauly wrote:See? Now I know you're full of shit. But hey if you think you can do better numbnuts, you go ahead and raise $300 million and give it a shot.
a competent director could have done better. could have started by actually reading the fucking books.
If you think anyone could have adapted the books into films without making changes, you're a more-than-huge idiot. Jackson is a devoted fan, and surrounded himself with other devoted fans to very capably make a very competent adaptation of the Lord of the Rings.
i never said they could be adapted without being changed you dumb fuck. however, they could have been adapted well. the second movie had nothing at all to do with the book. the first was good, and about 1/3 of the third movie was good, but the second was absolute shit.

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:57 pm
by Pauly
I think you're being harsh on the mud

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:59 pm
by plained
i like comedy so jack blacks fine, no hes not red skellton , but at least hes not all too serios

vince vaughn can act up quite the idiot hes pretty funny.

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:20 pm
by Tormentius
dnoyc wrote: i never said they could be adapted without being changed you dumb fuck. however, they could have been adapted well. the second movie had nothing at all to do with the book. the first was good, and about 1/3 of the third movie was good, but the second was absolute shit.
Thats an opinion many people would disagree with. Personally, I thought the whole trilogy couldn't have been done better. Excellent shows.