Page 11 of 15

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:47 pm
by Tsakali
where are the camera drones when you need them

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:32 am
by EtUL
GONNAFISTYA wrote:Well that was one hell of an explanation.
Your link said nothing near what you posted and the order was just a suggestion after a night of firefights. Ergo you make no sense. You're just showing your ass like usual and pretending it's everyone else who is stupid.

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:38 am
by xer0s
LawL wrote:
xer0s wrote:This story is crazy. There's soooooo much going on, it's hards to keep up with the timeline and what exactly happened.

Apparently the dude that got his legs blown off woke up in the hospital and asked for a pen and paper. He then helped identify the suspect...with Bradly Cooper by his side...
Did he used to speak with his feet?
I think he had a breathing tube in his throat.

But I acknowledge your joke and find it mildly amusing...

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:51 am
by GONNAFISTYA
EtUL wrote:
GONNAFISTYA wrote:Well that was one hell of an explanation.
Your link said nothing near what you posted and the order was just a suggestion after a night of firefights. Ergo you make no sense. You're just showing your ass like usual and pretending it's everyone else who is stupid.
My link showed a city telling everyone to hide under their desks until the big, bad terrorist man is captured....at least when I posted it...with the headline of "Boston In Lockdown". The page has obviously been updated...you know...several times in the hours since I posted it and a few more times in the 20 hours it's been up. The content has changed since I linked it and you're too stupid to notice that both the headline and information is very recent...like 20 minutes ago. :dork:

All you gotta do is check the article date, mornon.

However, you're correct in that the article didn't say to lock up your daughters, just your whole family. :olo:

Of course it's no surprise that a paranoid, fearful person wouldn't see that as something to laugh about.

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:54 am
by PrMink
what a mornon.

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:55 am
by LawL
xer0s wrote:But I acknowledge your joke and find it mildly amusing...
Thanks bro.

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:57 am
by GONNAFISTYA
He will kill you last.

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 1:00 am
by PrMink
little bro captured now, looking forward to motive... I'll take voice of god for a fiver.

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 1:11 am
by LawL
:olo: MrPrick :olo:

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 1:12 am
by EtUL
GONNAFISTYA wrote:
My link showed a city telling everyone to hide under their desks until the big, bad terrorist man is captured....at least when I posted it...with the headline of "Boston In Lockdown". The page has obviously been updated...you know...several times in the hours since I posted it and a few more times in the 20 hours it's been up. The content has changed since I linked it and you're too stupid to notice that both the headline and information is very recent...like 20 minutes ago. :dork:

All you gotta do is check the article date, mornon.

However, you're correct in that the article didn't say to lock up your daughters, just your whole family. :olo:

Of course it's no surprise that a paranoid, fearful person wouldn't see that as something to laugh about.
Your imagination and projection is nothing short of fascinating.

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 4:44 am
by GONNAFISTYA
What in sweet towering fuck does that even mean? :dork:

One can only hope you never reproduce, because then your kids will probably be as into Paris Hilton as you are.

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 4:45 am
by mjrpes
GONNAFISTYA wrote:ERMEHGERD....MUZLIMS!!!!

How come there aren't any good atheist terrorists?
Mao and Stalin killed them all :D

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 6:27 am
by feedback
PrMink wrote:little bro captured now, looking forward to motive... I'll take voice of god for a fiver.
His youtube account had 5 favourited videos, all are either worshiping Allah and one attacking Russia's policy in Chechnya.

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 6:37 am
by Don Carlos
General cuntyness is my guess

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 6:52 am
by seremtan
feedback wrote:His youtube account had 5 favourited videos, all are either worshiping Allah and one attacking Russia's policy in Chechnya.
he sure taught those Russkis not to mess with the Chech

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:30 pm
by bitWISE
Image

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:38 pm
by Underpants?
losCHUNK wrote:
Tsakali wrote:

uhm... so you're saying , if american didn't get off its fat ass (actually its ass wasn't fat back then) WW2 would have gone the same way?

don't think so.

also lets not forget NASA and other world changing R&D that happened because of america.

And if you want to be dubious , america chooses its wars well enough. Aren't were in the middle east to suck up all teh oilz or something? we just used the religious bunch to support the troop movement.

And lets not forget, the president doesn't get to fuck your wife before you get married.
I do, you were AWOL for the majority of the conflict that was happening on our door step and only got involved when the Japs managed to sneak a fleet to your back door. The Brits with the French dived in head 1st and even when the Frenchies failed and Hitler asked for a truce he got a big 'fuck you' instead. So any claims of America being prince Valiant can get fucked off ;). America at the very most shortened the conflict by a number of years and the biggest turning point was Hitlers own mistake in invading Russia. If Britain fell to the Germans then I could guarantee America would never have entered Europe and thus not ending any war.

Selecting opponents that don't hand you your ass would be a good start n all. You completely failed to read the situations in Korea, 'Nam and both Iraq conflicts during your 'prime'. In Britains golden age the sun never set and the world you see are the foundations it laid, but America is still impressed by religion :smirk:

I'll give you NASA, that was actually part of my previous post but then failed to back it up with further merits that didn't involve your movie industry or war machine :/. Americas not all bad It's just, I think, the rest of the world see's so much failed potential.

hmm, so I used to actually read probably 80% of your posts in any thread that I bothered with in this forum until this. Here's the deal: the US is not the world police. That was our stance all along until we got fucked in the Hawaiian ass. We responded, and now all of you shitty responsibility-shedding, angsty douchebags expect us to be involved in everything, which is a fucking retarded stance, bankrupt the morally responsible so no one else has to stand up and take part. This attitude, along with the apologists, in this forum, is weak as fuck. The ideal of Franklin's "I can't solve the world's problem until I solve mine" was embraced by France, but of course you British folk were at the time still expecting us to bend over and take it like the rest of the world without question. Guess some things never change. Go live in China for a few years. I'd like to hear your complaints about the US after that.

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:52 am
by losCHUNK
Underpants? wrote:
losCHUNK wrote: I do, you were AWOL for the majority of the conflict that was happening on our door step and only got involved when the Japs managed to sneak a fleet to your back door. The Brits with the French dived in head 1st and even when the Frenchies failed and Hitler asked for a truce he got a big 'fuck you' instead. So any claims of America being prince Valiant can get fucked off ;). America at the very most shortened the conflict by a number of years and the biggest turning point was Hitlers own mistake in invading Russia. If Britain fell to the Germans then I could guarantee America would never have entered Europe and thus not ending any war.

Selecting opponents that don't hand you your ass would be a good start n all. You completely failed to read the situations in Korea, 'Nam and both Iraq conflicts during your 'prime'. In Britains golden age the sun never set and the world you see are the foundations it laid, but America is still impressed by religion :smirk:

I'll give you NASA, that was actually part of my previous post but then failed to back it up with further merits that didn't involve your movie industry or war machine :/. Americas not all bad It's just, I think, the rest of the world see's so much failed potential.

hmm, so I used to actually read probably 80% of your posts in any thread that I bothered with in this forum until this. Here's the deal: the US is not the world police. That was our stance all along until we got fucked in the Hawaiian ass. We responded, and now all of you shitty responsibility-shedding, angsty douchebags expect us to be involved in everything, which is a fucking retarded stance, bankrupt the morally responsible so no one else has to stand up and take part. This attitude, along with the apologists, in this forum, is weak as fuck. The ideal of Franklin's "I can't solve the world's problem until I solve mine" was embraced by France, but of course you British folk were at the time still expecting us to bend over and take it like the rest of the world without question. Guess some things never change. Go live in China for a few years. I'd like to hear your complaints about the US after that.
lol wtf have we expected you to get involved with ?. I was also responding to a post that claimed America saved the world twice through the goodness of their heart, also liking to see any other nation take on the role and do a better job - just to keep it in context as those claims weren't entirely accurate. Did Franklin think he was the only one with problems though ?, 'boo hoo I got no money' whilst Germany is crotch stomping Democracy and his allies out of Europe cos they stuck up for Poland. America just wanted someone else to fight their battles before it got to them and never declared war on Germany because Europe was out of sight and out of mind.

I'd also consider the post pretty accurate considering some of the views I've taken on these boards. Every one of those wars I mentioned (post WWII) was with the US taking a lead role in world police wether the international community agreed with it or not, for better or for worse all those wars ended up in a complete circus needing scenarios like Blair drumming up support around Europe before going into Iraq and now defending his actions for doing so, completely fucking his reputation, now answering tough questions to independent panels about his time in power. Don't think I don't blame our own government for allowing us to get involved either, I think we're just as stupid for blindly following your asses into a war and needing to make up shit to make it sound legit.

The whole post, with my other posts in this thread are about how America tries to police the world when they have no right. Wether it be through funds to the IRA or clusterfucking a bunch of pakis, they'll do it regardless of what anyone but themselves think right down to simple shit like extradition laws, because it simply doesn't concern them.

Dont take it so personnel either this isn't aimed at your population, just your political ego.

And why the fuck would I want to live in China ?, oh because your lot run the rest of the world ? :smirk:

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 2:50 am
by Underpants?
I'm sorry Chunk if I've pegged you wrong but it seems to me that only an antisocial insensitive idiot like Mazda would consider this a good time to bash a group that has been attacked by cowardly terrorists. I'm some percentage of Irish and have considered for as long as I can remember the IRA attacks to be lowly and idiotic. Please find a fire to die in.

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 3:19 am
by losCHUNK
Underpants? wrote:I'm sorry Chunk if I've pegged you wrong but it seems to me that only an antisocial insensitive idiot like Mazda would consider this a good time to bash a group that has been attacked by cowardly terrorists. I'm some percentage of Irish and have considered for as long as I can remember the IRA attacks to be lowly and idiotic. Please find a fire to die in.
Dude if you want me to cry and give you a hug it's no problem. Obviously I think this is disgusting. To me None of this relates to the marathon bombings, it stopped being about that posts ago and was running my mouth when this could have been a pair of white dudes with still no idea of their motives.

The last 3/4 quotes have been about WWII ffs. I was more on the subject of your governments international policies and how they have changed once 'it happens to them' so to speak. It's no secret that arms and money was being transferred from the US to UK right up until Sept 11th 2001, Clinton sticking his nose in and ending the ceasefire we had in place since the 80s n all.

edit: the ironic thing is I actually didn't mention Boston links (due to the Irish ancestry) to the IRA to show respect.

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:09 am
by Captain
Underpants? wrote:I'm sorry Chunk if I've pegged you wrong but it seems to me that only an antisocial insensitive idiot like Mazda would consider this a good time to bash a group that has been attacked by cowardly terrorists. I'm some percentage of Irish and have considered for as long as I can remember the IRA attacks to be lowly and idiotic. Please find a fire to die in.
Image

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:56 am
by seremtan
hey guys, love the liberal use of the word 'we' when talking about events none of you mouth-running fags had anything to do with

gg :up:

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:33 pm
by losCHUNK
That's kinda why I trying to say not to take it so personnel. Bluenose.

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:53 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Honest question. (And this does not mean I condone or am in any way happy about this event).

Should not the U.S. expect this when they're half way around the world bombing weddings and dinner parties on a regular basis?

I'm a non-violence is the way to go type of person so this kind of stuff depresses and sickens me but does it do any good to just be all consoling and not looking at root causes? Is it really bashing?

Re: Boston Marathon explosions?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 2:07 pm
by GONNAFISTYA
^Anti-Muricun douchebag who hates Muricuh^