Quake3World

dubz wrote:answer the questions above

You lost your argument about polls and now shift to something else.

Whats up trump jr fox news?

when all else fails, resort to whataboutism

did any of you have any arguments at all? no.. except for red font guy trying in his ordinary way of reading headlines and make the rest up way..

why the polls were so off remains unanswered, chunk only pointed out the last week.... i dont see any headlines calling for a complete revision of polling practices now that the trump polls were so inaccurate.... polls are still working, statisticians know it, politician know it, reporters play dumb..

while you ponder on that i gave you another example of msm conspiracy which i tought would be easier to understand as its just real straight forward facts.


will anyone answer the last 3? all these condescending attitudes and only chunk with the balls to share his view..

is sending debate questions secretly to one candidate even a legal thing? if they all did it to advance one candidate is that a conspiracy?

are you gonna deny that hillary got the debate questions beforehand?

Yes, yes, and no.

That was easy.

What amazes me here is that conspiracy theorists usually take some sort of fact and then come up with a crazy ass theory about how said fact came to fruition.
dubz isn't even arguing about a fact here. He's arguing that there was a conspiracy for something that didn't even end up happening.

hillary still lost, despite the conspiracy

transient seems to agree there was a conspiracy...


can you anwser the same 3 quesitons eraser?

lets see what results you get...

Just remember, conspiring doesn't necessarily mean breaking the law. The DNC is a private organization and they're allowed to make (and break) any rules they want.

Transient wrote:Yes, yes, and no.

That was easy.

Futher proof we never went to the moon.

MKJ wrote:when all else fails, resort to whataboutism

Slowly making their way from Trumps lies about TIME to “but her emails”.

dubz wrote:did any of you have any arguments at all? no.. except for red font guy trying in his ordinary way of reading headlines and make the rest up way..

why the polls were so off remains unanswered, chunk only pointed out the last week.... i dont see any headlines calling for a complete revision of polling practices now that the trump polls were so inaccurate.... polls are still working, statisticians know it, politician know it, reporters play dumb..

while you ponder on that i gave you another example of msm conspiracy which i tought would be easier to understand as its just real straight forward facts.


will anyone answer the last 3? all these condescending attitudes and only chunk with the balls to share his view..

I told you why the polls tightened in the final week and how they were inaccurate in their prediction, told you why polls will never be perfect, gave you 4 examples of how they've been wrong in the past. There were no headlines involved in this and gave you the data to show it and held your hand as I walked you through it. They don't need to change their method as like I said, it will never be perfect, increasing the sample size won't help and the logistics of collecting data for all states and presenting information takes time so will still be slow to react to situations if collected more frequently. All you could retort to was 'but polls are always accurate / the statisticians can't be wrong' with some added tag lines without actually addressing anything I told you.

You seem to now agree that the polls were accurate in the final week, they were accurate throughout, the inaccurate thing with polls is their interpretation which is prone to swings and incomplete data, that was was wrong in the final week and I've said why.

how come hillarys camp had the right poll numbers internally? they point this out in their conversations that the media polls are all off in hillarys favor... i already linked you to these emails when it first came out. thats another fact you cant dispute but you keep on theorizing...

shaft wrote:

MKJ wrote:when all else fails, resort to whataboutism

Slowly making their way from Trumps lies about TIME to “but her emails”.

you gave the sarcastic remark about a conspiracy, thats why we are expanding the topic.

are you afraid or unable to defend your vies? or why do you dodge? obviously you want to play...

so please answer the 3 questions, its pretty simple

is sending debate questions secretly to one candidate even a legal thing? if they all did it to advance one candidate is that a conspiracy?

are you gonna deny that hillary got the debate questions beforehand?

dubz wrote:how come hillarys camp had the right poll numbers internally? they point this out in their conversations that the media polls are all off in hillarys favor... i already linked you to these emails when it first came out. thats another fact you cant dispute but you keep on theorizing...

It's not theorising it's how polls work. You won't even address it.

The Podesta email is just requesting polls and they were provided, they probably paid them for the service as they are a company, paid extra for how to interprate them, Trump could've done the same. Also they can apply whatever formula they want it doesn't mean the media will use it, it's just something they can use to target groups and shout how things aren't so bad. It means absolutely bugger all and Trump done the same.

But more importantly you say the email says how the polls are in Hillarys favour ?, in this link ? (it was the only one) -

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-2 ... versamples .

This Email, the only one on the page, saying how much Hillary is leading by ? (it doesn't)

[lvlshot]http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/ ... %201_0.jpg[/lvlshot]

Look at the date you dopey cunt.

wrong email

So you were wrong again.

Stop wasting your time. The guy can't even look objectively at what so called heavily skewed numbers in Clinton favor did. His conspiracy doesn't even make any fucking sense. Its like saying Comey was conspiring with Clinton to help her lose.

why do you dodge 3 simple questions.. afraid or unable to defend your views?

Undercover sting operation by Project Veritas against WaPo discovered.

This whole story is gold.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investig ... story.html

No wonder the GOP keeps thinking Dems are making shit up, it's classic projection.

Lucky for O’keefe most Trump voters won’t care as his narrative makes conspiracy junkies like dubz rock hard. Facts are a minor inconvenience.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/935485196689920007[/tweet]

shaft wrote:Undercover sting operation by Project Veritas against WaPo discovered.

This whole story is gold.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investig ... story.html

Now compare that story to this beautiful piece of journalism from last week.

[tweet]https://twitter.com/briansflood/status/ ... 1584942081[/tweet]

Jesus Christ this guy

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/29/politics/ ... index.html

I saw it blow up on twater. It will only make him stronger

"plotting liberal agenda"

wat