Quake3World

plained wrote:what is my opinion?

You're 2/3 through his book, so by know your opinion is just what they wanted it to be.

i read all his books about 10 books ago.

atm i'm reading "detroit rock city"

uugg!

iggy pop this ted nugent that

fricken boring stuff but there is some small value in there i guess

seremtan wrote:supporting Trump is the way some Americans express their repressed desire for Putin

You got me.

I'd rather have a man that is willing to publicize his womanizing rather than see it as a secret debuting on the news. Its not a secret you want to do that chick. You play quake.

Doombrain wrote:Makes no difference, your opinion is still a fascist one.

Mine is still the fastest.

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:I think it's very important that we take as many refugees as possible

i'm fine with families, kids, women and the elderly coming here from Syria

single young men can go rape some place else

Memphis wrote:

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:Also refugees are good for the economy...

DuffingtonPost wrote:...In Canada's Have-Not Regions

so you disagree, but have you any proof to back it up.

check out the research on this. immigrants contribute to the countries they move to, they aren't a net drain. If you have any proof to the contrary feel free to post it.

seremtan wrote:i'm fine with families, kids

Of course you are.

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote: so you disagree, but have you any proof to back it up.

check out the research on this. immigrants contribute to the countries they move to, they aren't a net drain. If you have any proof to the contrary feel free to post it.

There are some arguements for and against, I know our house of lords conducted a report that remained somewhat inconclusive n all, even hinting that there's some slight negative effects - like decrease in wages and job loss to the poorest of those born in Britain - but very, very slight.

I know in the UK for example that your twice as likely to seek social help (welfare/benefits/hospital) than someone native born. Immigrants take up 3/4s of newly created jobs n all so make of that what you will (ONS stats).

I havn't got a stance either way tbh though, should we only let in skilled workers ?, meh, will it make any difference ?, probably not so fuck it. I don't usually like debating it cos 9 times out of 10 it turns into the reinforcement of someones racism, like for example someone will say "they come over here and claim Tax Credits and....jobs", well the problem there isn't immigration is it ?, it's that they're on Tax Credits, or our government has failed in providing us work.

This is the house of lords thingy -

http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/briefin ... cument/235 (I think, I only skimmed it)

African immigrants often don't. they have special stores and often cant get visas for families so they're working jobs to save up all that money to take back, taking the jobs someone you know couldnt get because its a political 'favor'.

White people seem to care, but the only immigrants coming into this nation are the ones that take our tax dollars and rarely contribute. Who doesn't like mexican food? Other than having a good mexican restaraunt or some other, they're useless and dont have the dna to advance what society has invented/contributed.

I say, it's time to outsource the mexican food time to rebrand.

Yep ^

That's usually how the convo ends up.

But the politicians serve us.
We dont give a fuck about no africans.
And the ones coming in from euro or advanced blend in better than you do.
So tell me what this country means,
This country was built on indo-european and some decent asian, not no mexican african.

You tell me how thart last statement works for you.
Your scumbag politicians are selling america for a blowjob.

overpriced

John^Rocker wrote:But the politicians serve us.

MORON ALERT!...

losCHUNK wrote:[
I know in the UK for example that your twice as likely to seek social help (welfare/benefits/hospital) than someone native born. Immigrants take up 3/4s of newly created jobs n all so make of that what you will (ONS stats).

Sounds contradictory.
Also, if immigrants take 3/4 of newly created jobs then that says less about immigrants than it does about the native Brits who are either too lazy, dumb or stubborn to take up those jobs themselves.

How so ?, you can claim benefits whilst in work.

The 3/4 thing can be interpreted more than 1 way n all, which is why I said make of it what you will.

Eraser wrote:Also, if immigrants take 3/4 of newly created jobs then that says less about immigrants than it does about the native Brits who are either too lazy, dumb or stubborn to take up those jobs themselves.

or it says that these new jobs are mostly shit jobs, and that the UK is pursuing a nonsensical strategy of creating as many graduates as possible without being able to guarantee them a job at the end of their (expensive) degree that matches the expectations that come with possessing that degree

Big day today. Let's see if Trump supporters can put their vote where his mouth is.

Also, hopefully Bernie can come out on top. Really needing a strong turnout in Iowa. The problem is, in 2008 and 2012, the votin was a month earlier. So a lot of the college crowd wasn't at school and more available to vote. This year it's a little more difficult for them to do so. And that's a big majority of Bernie supporters. We'll see if they can make it happen...

seremtan wrote:

Eraser wrote:Also, if immigrants take 3/4 of newly created jobs then that says less about immigrants than it does about the native Brits who are either too lazy, dumb or stubborn to take up those jobs themselves.

...and that the UK is pursuing a nonsensical strategy of creating as many graduates as possible without being able to guarantee them a job at the end of their (expensive) degree that matches the expectations that come with possessing that degree

Rly ?, I wouldve said that's on the decline due to the massive increases in tuition fees.

Its gone from free (It was free, right ?), to almost 10k pa in 18 years ?

xer0s wrote:Big day today.

Yes because we all know Iowa has the best record of picking the eventual nominee.

Spoiler alert...they have the worst.

QerOs is such an idiot, I'm surprised anyone reads what he types.

A Trump win today, in a state with his worst poll numbers should pretty much end the hope of the other Trump Show contestants.

I don't think Iowa has ever picked the President. So one might think whoever they pick/does well won't win. No?