Re: And another one
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 5:37 am
Motor vehicles aren't designed for the sole purpose of killing nor does a person possess them for "home defense".
No...I'm actually paraphrasing what some morons in your government have been suggesting....publically....with recording devices active.YourGrandpa wrote:So you're abandoning serious discussion?
Guns aren't designed for the "sole" purpose of killing people and I don't "need" them for home defense.LawL wrote:Motor vehicles aren't designed for the sole purpose of killing nor does a person possess them for "home defense".
Well I don't necessarily prescribe to those suggestions and you're not currently conversing with those individuals. If you want to have a reasonable dialog I'm willing to listen. Though I'm sure we're not going to see eye to eye. But if you want to continue the troll I'll understand.GONNAFISTYA wrote:No...I'm actually paraphrasing what some morons in your government have been suggesting....publically....with recording devices active.
I'm of course exaggerating, but the spirit is in the same retarded mindset of bad ideas presented as excuses to have a gun.
Yet you choose to have them in your house simply because "you can", which as I said before makes it all the more pathetic.YourGrandpa wrote:Guns aren't designed for the "sole" purpose of killing people and I don't "need" them for home defense.LawL wrote:Motor vehicles aren't designed for the sole purpose of killing nor does a person possess them for "home defense".
And the nonsensical troll continues. Bye Bye.LawL wrote: Yet you choose to have them in your house simply because "you can", which as I said before makes it all the more pathetic.
It's not entirely alien though is it ?, my country at least does allow a person to own fire arms (granted, not for self defence or automatic rifles with grenade launchersYourGrandpa wrote:Your "need" theory with regards to me is what's comical. I don't "need" a gun. Do you "need" everything you own? I have a gun because I can legally own one. But I realize that concept is foreign to you and wouldn't expect you to understand.LawL wrote:It's ok, I don't need any help in laughing at the mentality of someone who believes they need a "home defense firearm".
YourGrandpa wrote:Guns aren't designed for the "sole" purpose of killing people and I don't "need" them for home defense.
We've had a shooting almost every day in major areas for the last 4 days. Body count I think is 4 or 5 right now. 2 of which were cops that got plugged before they could draw a weapon. Most recent shooting was 2 cars shooting at eachother driving down a main drag of road.LawL wrote:It's ok, I don't need any help in laughing at the mentality of someone who believes they need a "home defense firearm".
Understand I have empathy for the situation. The kiddo got extra hugs and spoiled to shit the next few days after things happened. But when is it finally "ok" to talk about gun control and right to bear arms? How long is it until we can actually address the problem?diego wrote:I am shocked how anybody still can believe in his "Rights to bear arms" after this incident. These were little kids, don't you have any empathy?
LawL wrote:Have you ever considered living somewhere else as an alternative to having a gun and living in the utter fucking shithole that you just described?
diego wrote:I am shocked how anybody still can believe in his "Rights to bear arms" after this incident. These were little kids, don't you have any empathy?
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs266/en/WHO wrote:Global warming that has occurred since the 1970s caused over 140 000 excess deaths annually by the year 2004.
You live in Kansas. shut up.SOAPboy wrote:We've had a shooting almost every day in major areas for the last 4 days. Body count I think is 4 or 5 right now. 2 of which were cops that got plugged before they could draw a weapon. Most recent shooting was 2 cars shooting at eachother driving down a main drag of road.LawL wrote:It's ok, I don't need any help in laughing at the mentality of someone who believes they need a "home defense firearm".
Shits fucking crazy right now. Carrying a weapon makes someone feel safe. And if they do it on the legal, why the fuck not? If a criminal can carry one illegally and get away with DRIVING DOWN A STREET AND SHOOTING UP ANOTHER CAR, why cant I or anyone else carry going through the system?
Protection is not a bad thing. Its just fucking sad any of us have to think (and im some cases, really do need said weapon) we need a weapon to protect themselves. This fucking country. Swear to god.
And its not like I live in fucking compton. Thats the crazy part. Mofos are just straight shooting shit up right now with no regard for anyone.
Not everyone lives on a beach somewhere nice where they dont have to worry about crackheads kicking your front door in for a flat screen. Robberies around here end up with dead people if they are home. We had a close friend come home to people robbing their house, shes now dead. They shot her without any regard for her life. For her flat screen TV and computer. Another neighbor (Keep in mind, In an area where the cheapest house is 250,000 and 4,000 square feet), a few houses down the door was kicked in, They shot the dog, and husband, then stole the TV and nothing else.
Again, Shit is fucking crazy in some places. Theres a place for a gun for home protection. AR-15s arnt it, But A handgun in the night stand isnt exactly a bad thing.
I have no idea why I would even try to get you to understand something like that. But hey, Theres some facts for you. Not everywhere is nice and safe.
shaft wrote: You live in Kansas. shut up.
A Wentzville man is jailed after allegedly becoming agitated during a barber shop discussion of the Newtown, Conn., shooting and allegedly shooting in the direction of a patron.
Assault, armed criminal action and unlawful possession of a weapon charges were filed against 57-year-old Lester Davis of Wentzville following the shooting Tuesday at All Cuts Barber Shop in Wentzville.
A patron made the comment that the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School made him want to kill the suspect. For unknown reasons, police say Davis took the comment as a threat and asked, “You want to murder me?”
Davis then allegedly went to his car, retrieved a pistol and fired three times in the customer’s direction. No one was hurt.
Pffffffffffffft - if the barber shop owner had been packing then that wouldn't have happenedRyoki wrote:A Wentzville man is jailed after allegedly becoming agitated during a barber shop discussion of the Newtown, Conn., shooting and allegedly shooting in the direction of a patron.
Assault, armed criminal action and unlawful possession of a weapon charges were filed against 57-year-old Lester Davis of Wentzville following the shooting Tuesday at All Cuts Barber Shop in Wentzville.
A patron made the comment that the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School made him want to kill the suspect. For unknown reasons, police say Davis took the comment as a threat and asked, “You want to murder me?”
Davis then allegedly went to his car, retrieved a pistol and fired three times in the customer’s direction. No one was hurt.
Especially since we arguably have less freedoms than a lot of other countries.Mogul wrote:I find the argument that boils down to "FREEDOM!!!!!" to be the most senseless one.