Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
yeah but even if geoffrey had actually had ball cancer, it wouldn't have been his fault, so piss-taking would have been inappropriate. charles is in this situation because of bad (and entirely avoidable) choices he himself made (assuming the allegations are true, that is)
the piss-taking gwamps got when he posted about his dad dying was borderline. on the one hand, it was worthy of empathy, but on the other hand he did it in such a way that it was obvious he was trying to provoke the very piss-taking he received. it was a kind of meta-piss-taking, if you will
the piss-taking gwamps got when he posted about his dad dying was borderline. on the one hand, it was worthy of empathy, but on the other hand he did it in such a way that it was obvious he was trying to provoke the very piss-taking he received. it was a kind of meta-piss-taking, if you will
-
- Posts: 10074
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
So you're saying I was looking to be shit on when I posted about my father death?
FFS.
I posted because I wanted to share what was going on in my life. Did I think people could be dick bags about it? Sure. But that's certainly not what I wanted.
And if BawL is a rapist, fuck him...
FFS.

I posted because I wanted to share what was going on in my life. Did I think people could be dick bags about it? Sure. But that's certainly not what I wanted.
And if BawL is a rapist, fuck him...
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
"charged with one count of having sexual intercourse without consent and another charge of indecent assault.". Pretty sure that's rape...
....

Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
We’ve established that...
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
Not shaft... He's really misses lawl apparently...
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
He literally quoted the exact same line you did. 

[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
scared? wrote:Not shaft... He's really misses lawl apparently...
You can tell from the multiple topics I've made and how I scoured the public records of a foreign country in search of him since he left.
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
I kill ppl on a routine basis for using that word... Care to be next?...Transient wrote:literally
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
You’re figuratively a douche bag...
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
It's a pet peeve of mine, too, bro. At least when I use the word, I use it correctly.scared? wrote:I kill ppl on a routine basis for using that word... Care to be next?...

[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
Trial Day 4 coming up...
They’re bringing in a new judge. Wonder what that’s about...
They’re bringing in a new judge. Wonder what that’s about...
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
Noticed that too, also seen they've changed to court lg4 ?
I need to know what this means
I need to know what this means
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
I’m really surprised this isn’t publicized. The only news we’ve seen of it was back in 2016.
I feel like anywhere else, if a cop raped a woman, the news would be all over this. At the very least, the local media would have a few articles. But there’s nothing...
I feel like anywhere else, if a cop raped a woman, the news would be all over this. At the very least, the local media would have a few articles. But there’s nothing...
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
it's only a story once they're arrested, when the mere accusation is presented as if it were guilt. the media aren't interested enough to follow the case to find out if he's actually guilty
never underestimate the willingness of some journalists/editors to dogwhistle for quick adshekels
never underestimate the willingness of some journalists/editors to dogwhistle for quick adshekels
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
adshekels.
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
Maybe he knew her from Bondi Beach...xer0s wrote:Trial Day 4 coming up...
They’re bringing in a new judge. Wonder what that’s about...
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
I actually mailed the news agency that wrote the article in this thread asking if they'd like to follow it up cos its gone to trial, hoping they'd get some info for us. That was like 2 days ago, never heard fuck all.seremtan wrote:it's only a story once they're arrested, when the mere accusation is presented as if it were guilt. the media aren't interested enough to follow the case to find out if he's actually guilty
never underestimate the willingness of some journalists/editors to dogwhistle for quick adshekels
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
Christ, don't lead them back here. They would have a field day with the crap posted on this shit hole.
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
Now that was a good idealosCHUNK wrote:I actually mailed the news agency that wrote the article in this thread asking if they'd like to follow it up cos its gone to trial, hoping they'd get some info for us. That was like 2 days ago, never heard fuck all.

[color=#FFBF00]Physicist [/color][color=#FF4000]of[/color] [color=#0000FF]Q3W[/color]
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
lol, wouldn’t that be some shit? If they only knew what kind of degrading things lawl has said about women on here. I’d love to see them quote some of lawl’s posts at the trial...Doombrain wrote:Christ, don't lead them back here. They would have a field day with the crap posted on this shit hole.
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
Your honor, I give you exhibit A...
LawL wrote:I've got two bitches pregnant in my time. Made them both have abortions. Strong ownage right there.Eraser wrote:Lawl and xer0s are just jealous because they've got dead sperm.
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
Jesus. See this is the shit that could do him real damage, it's where I draw the line. Laughing at his situation is one thing but pulling that up and making it known is low.
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
without actual physical evidence to back it up it's just hearsay
courts tend to be old-fashioned like that. they don't follow internet rules
courts tend to be old-fashioned like that. they don't follow internet rules
Re: Okay Google, who is officer Charles?...
Aye, if by some miracle they do find their way here they still gotta prove it was him, then it was him making the posts, try to get them admitted to an ongoing trial before making the case about context and relevance.
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]