Re: What is new in your little world?
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 2:54 pm
Yes pro...
Your world is waiting...
https://www.quake3world.com/forum/
That triumph looks a lot like the cbr500f. The upright position is very comfy on the cbr, I've put 30k on mine and except for a slightly sore shoulders the first few rides of the season it's a good bike for long rides.Eraser wrote:This one (the CBR650F) has about 40HP more than the 500R, clocking in at 85HP. It's a four inline block though, so it gives most of its grunt at the higher rpms, which makes it a lot more predictable and friendly than other (twin engine) sportsbikes. I reckon the 500R is a little more aggressive in handling as it's a parallel twin engine. Some people would say the 650F is too tame, making it boring to ride, but I'm looking for a sporty-looking bike that'll serve me as a commuter as well, and considering this'll be my first real bike, I'm not looking for a riding death trapIf I open up the throttle and push it past 7000, 8000 RPM the thing starts to howl and has some serious acceleration though.
Its seating position is a little more upright than say a 600RR, which makes it more comfortable to ride.
If all works out as planned I'll also be riding a 2014 Triumph Street Triple R this afternoon. Quite a different bike, bit more playful I guess, but I love its looks. Still an option as well.
[lvlshot]http://images.mcn.bauercdn.com/upload/294098/images/06-street-triple-r.jpg[/lvlshot]
Shows what you know. The CBR is a 649cc engine while the Street Triple has a 675cc engine. Just got back from riding it and the ST is so nimble and literally has torque pouring out of it everywhere. You can accelerate from 20kph to 80kph in its 2nd gear if you like. Its cornering abilities are so smooth. It was actually more fun to ride than the CBR, but I guess confidence was part of that as well. The ST is both lighter and has more HP so, OK, that's a factor as well.YourGrandpa wrote:Get the CBR. You'd be better served getting a bigger bike if cost isn't the issue. Otherwise you'll be ready to trade up in less than a year.
Understandable. I think too few motorcyclists realize how little protection you actually have on a bike and how important it is to ride proactively and defensively. Foresee situations before they actually happen so you can avoid them, even if that means breaking the speed limit now and then.saturn wrote:Every time I feel the need to learn to ride a bike, a motorcyclist comes into the hospital with serious injuries. But I totally understand the feeling of speed and freedom, especially on sunny days like today. Maybe in the future.
I know your natural instinct is to be a fuck stick. But I wasn't suggesting the CBR because I thought it was bigger than the the triumph. I was suggesting you get a bigger bike period. The CBR is also a better product. Calm down.Eraser wrote: Shows what you know. The CBR is a 649cc engine while the Street Triple has a 675cc engine. .
I was 100% set on a Ducati Monster, until I decided to also test ride a Street Triple. Just getting 20 minutes with it completely changed my mind. The power curve is smooth and responsive, you never really feel like it's going to let you down when you need it. It's nimble and manoeuvrable, and quite low, which was good for a shorty like me, but you may find it cramped if you're much taller. Literally not a single Street Triple rider I've ever spoken to has regretted their decision. I think it's a very solid bike. Good luck with the decisionEraser wrote:Just got back from riding it and the ST is so nimble and literally has torque pouring out of it everywhere. You can accelerate from 20kph to 80kph in its 2nd gear if you like. Its cornering abilities are so smooth. It was actually more fun to ride than the CBR, but I guess confidence was part of that as well. The ST is both lighter and has more HP so, OK, that's a factor as well.
I'm really torn between the two now. Both are priced similarly, except that the ST has 25000 km while the CBR has less than 1000. The CBR still has 1.5 years of factory warranty while the ST only gets 6 mo of warranty from the dealer.
Why would you suggest "a bigger bike period"? That's such a bullshit suggestion. Displacement and horsepower isn't everything, certainly not for a beginner like me. Also, why is the CBR a better product? Triumph makes high quality, premium bikes. The Street TripleR is also more feature rich than the CBR650F.YourGrandpa wrote:I know your natural instinct is to be a fuck stick. But I wasn't suggesting the CBR because I thought it was bigger than the the triumph. I was suggesting you get a bigger bike period. The CBR is also a better product. Calm down.Eraser wrote: Shows what you know. The CBR is a 649cc engine while the Street Triple has a 675cc engine. .
Look, behind GrandPa are the millions of people who agree helmets are dangerous because they restrict your view and hearing.YourGrandpa wrote:Pics from today's ride...
[lvlshot]https://scontent-mia1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/17523013_10155162500713711_8724920483018426598_n.jpg?oh=01b113ef0682c970a680d5ca5b1c36d4&oe=59598E99[/lvlshot][/lvlshot]
So you think you're capable of riding a 650, but not a 1000 and you can't see how eventually becoming a more experienced rider might make you regret your inferior purchase? Got it...Eraser wrote:Why would you suggest "a bigger bike period"? That's such a bullshit suggestion. Displacement and horsepower isn't everything, certainly not for a beginner like me. Also, why is the CBR a better product? Triumph makes high quality, premium bikes. The Street TripleR is also more feature rich than the CBR650F.
Yes. They provide a little back ground noise while sitting and red lights. Headphones are illegal here. But I'm sure you wear them.Κracus wrote:Is that a speaker on your bike gramps?
I always laugh a little when I hear some old guy driving by with his hog while blaring out ac -dc from his speakers loud enough for a city block to hear.
Wish the weather was warmer here... I'd totally hit the road all day today.