Page 17 of 284

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:03 pm
by Dave
Doombrain wrote:
Dave wrote:Oh, btw DB... what lenses are you using on that Epson? The color is outstanding
ZEISS BIOGON T* f/2 35mm ZM :)

The cone's a reflection from the street corner on the other side.
damn.. that's one bad ass reflection :o

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:22 pm
by Ryoki
Dave wrote:TY sir. It requires time I really don't have at the moment. I also lack experience, which I plan on using my weekends this fall fixing. I'm trying to break into some local sporting events... I just can't get the damn university atheltic department to return my email. It might be time to call some favors >:E
Oh ey.
I wouldn't know the first thing about how to engage in such stuff... maybe create a portfolio, send it to magazines or newspapers, see what happens?

Ah well, you need to make the time for it first :)

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 4:39 pm
by Dave
Image

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 6:45 pm
by ToxicBug
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:52 pm
by Dave
Image

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:15 pm
by werldhed
@Toxic: Those are looking good; I think the exposure is improved over the last ones. But why do you keep shooting the ugliest damn cars? :p


@ Dave: Those are... how do you say it... Fucking. Awesome. :icon20: :icon14:

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:30 pm
by MKJ
fucking hell dave, if i had a ... fuck dont know what its called in english-printer i'd print a blow up of that one out and frame it.

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:32 pm
by werldhed

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:38 pm
by MKJ
pretty much. my dad used to have one for his job and it would make the most amazing prints on all types of paper.
cost him an arm and a leg, too.

no idea where the thing is now.. he prolly sold it to one of his friends for way too little

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 10:27 pm
by prince1000
Dave wrote:Then we might as well not use digital
no, just dont use it as a crutch

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:27 am
by ToxicBug
werldhed wrote:@Toxic: Those are looking good; I think the exposure is improved over the last ones. But why do you keep shooting the ugliest damn cars? :p
It was the client's car.

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 11:34 am
by Dave
MKJ wrote:pretty much. my dad used to have one for his job and it would make the most amazing prints on all types of paper.
cost him an arm and a leg, too.

no idea where the thing is now.. he prolly sold it to one of his friends for way too little
I really want one of those things (epson 7800), but I can't quite justify the 3K it costs. The price really isn't that bad, but you still have to buy replacement ink and paper. Unless you plan on selling prints from it or are worth a fair amount because of your day job, it's a bit much.

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 12:11 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
Image

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 12:50 pm
by Dave
Juggs :(

© The JuggerNaut school of disapproval

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 1:51 pm
by werldhed
Dave wrote:
MKJ wrote:pretty much. my dad used to have one for his job and it would make the most amazing prints on all types of paper.
cost him an arm and a leg, too.

no idea where the thing is now.. he prolly sold it to one of his friends for way too little
I really want one of those things (epson 7800), but I can't quite justify the 3K it costs. The price really isn't that bad, but you still have to buy replacement ink and paper. Unless you plan on selling prints from it or are worth a fair amount because of your day job, it's a bit much.
Do you have access to one at school? We have one here that students can use, but you have to pay for it. I forget how much. It might be worth it to try it out on one of those photos, just to see how it looks.
My brother also has access to one at his architecture firm, and he’s printed off some pretty sweet posters for me with it.

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:01 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
Dave wrote:Juggs :(

© The JuggerNaut school of disapproval
but just look at that thing.

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:23 pm
by Dave
werldhed wrote:
Dave wrote:
MKJ wrote:pretty much. my dad used to have one for his job and it would make the most amazing prints on all types of paper.
cost him an arm and a leg, too.

no idea where the thing is now.. he prolly sold it to one of his friends for way too little
I really want one of those things (epson 7800), but I can't quite justify the 3K it costs. The price really isn't that bad, but you still have to buy replacement ink and paper. Unless you plan on selling prints from it or are worth a fair amount because of your day job, it's a bit much.
Do you have access to one at school? We have one here that students can use, but you have to pay for it. I forget how much. It might be worth it to try it out on one of those photos, just to see how it looks.
My brother also has access to one at his architecture firm, and he’s printed off some pretty sweet posters for me with it.
Yeah, but i think you need to be taking a related class to use it. Maybe I'll just pretend I am >:E

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:25 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Dave wrote:troo :p

now why is there a traffic cone in that building? it vexes me greatly. It's those little uncertainities in that pic that make it wunderbar.
a swim coach is using it as a megaphone maybe?


btw dave some of the photos you've posted are outstanding :icon14:

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:26 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
[quote="ToxicBug"][/quote]

the first two are junk because of that car in the background, but the rest are real nice.


Dave, when you gonna start offering some of them shots in higher rez.

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:26 pm
by Dave
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
Dave wrote:Juggs :(

© The JuggerNaut school of disapproval
but just look at that thing.
How long until Fox airs a show called "When strange beasts attack"?

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:27 pm
by Dave
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
ToxicBug wrote:
the first two are junk because of that car in the background, but the rest are real nice.


Dave, when you gonna start offering some of them shots in higher rez.
when ever someone asks ;)

Oh and if they do happen to ask for wallpaper a size would be nice

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:35 pm
by MKJ
i think you should check that uni printer thing and make me a blow up :icon32:

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:54 pm
by FragaGeddon
Dave wrote:troo :p

now why is there a traffic cone in that building? it vexes me greatly. It's those little uncertainities in that pic that make it wunderbar.
It's not in that bulding.

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:57 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
FragaGeddon wrote:
Dave wrote:troo :p

now why is there a traffic cone in that building? it vexes me greatly. It's those little uncertainities in that pic that make it wunderbar.
It's not in that bulding.
:olo:

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 6:17 pm
by Dave
yeah, we established that a long time ago