Page 165 of 535
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 12:17 am
by mac
7zark7 wrote:Spiderman 3 = WASTE OF FUCKING TIME.
absolute garbage.
exactly, what an pos movie after the first 2, now this absolute bullshit. 33% crying 33% talking 33% pointless action..
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 3:36 am
by obsidian
Spiderman 3 on IMAX (all movies I see these days are in IMAX since I found a little loophole in the pricing system... teehehehe).
7/10. I don't mind crying scenes in movies, it's just that Toby McGuire is really bad at it. They really just had too much stuff in it that they couldn't really tie in together cohesively.
*Spoiler Alert*
Why would the butler guy tell Harry about his dad dying by his own sword NOW? So he let Harry and Peter duke it out for all this time and then casually, "oh... um... forgot to mention to you, sir... before you keep trying to kill your best friend, it wasn't his fault. Mmkay, still wanted those spider tracking pumpkin bombs that you ordered?"
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 11:33 pm
by Captain
Spider Man 3 - 1/10
Nauseating shit. Most of the people got up and left in the last half an hour. Loud boos were heard when the title credits appeared, most of them emanating from my mouth. The '1' comes from Kirsten Dunst getting thrown on the floor.
Worst $11.50 I ever spent.
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 1:35 am
by Hannibal
Pan's Labyrinth: 6.5/10 Bits of gay but still OK.
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 9:03 am
by Grudge
looks like Spiderman upset Captain Jihad
I really see no difference between the three Spiderman films. They basically consist of the same elements, and I can't really think of any series of films that keep such a consistent level of quality. I don't really see how people can be upset by this last one? It's basically the same as the previous ones?
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 4:58 pm
by plained
ey doen let peeps upsetness upset you there man !
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 4:20 am
by 7zark7
This is England 10/10
Wow.
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 4:26 am
by LawL
Grudge wrote:looks like Spiderman upset Captain Jihad
I really see no difference between the three Spiderman films. They basically consist of the same elements, and I can't really think of any series of films that keep such a consistent level of quality. I don't really see how people can be upset by this last one? It's basically the same as the previous ones?
I'm sure it is, as the first two were complete shite.
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 4:27 am
by LawL
28 Weeks Later.
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 5:51 am
by ajerara
saw this odd movie called " The Rapture". Not sure if it's a religious movie, a horror movie or a fantasy movie or what. I guess I'd give it a 5/10 for being unusual, and mildly thought provoking, but if you can't stomach Christianity you might get tired of it quick. I still can't figure out if it was in favor of the whole Rapture theory or against it. It's kind of a b movie, too, I would say. Not much of a budget, although the way they did the beginning of the Rapture was kind of cool.
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 7:31 pm
by Grudge
The Black Dahlia - 5/10
Marie Antoinette - 6/10
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 8:31 pm
by Foo
Smokin Aces - Domino all over again in terms of cheese cinematic effects and character/stereotype stuff. Still watchable pulp just like Domino.
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 11:22 pm
by Foo
The Fountain - Ey not bad, a bit wierd but in a mainstream kooky kinda way.
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 11:05 am
by Don Carlos
Xmen 3 (again) 8/10
Love it, absolutly brilliant film
l
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 3:42 am
by Hannibal
Letters from Iwo Jima: 8/10 A damn sight better than the Foreskin of Our Forefathers or whatever it was called.
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 4:08 am
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Spiderman 3 -definitely the weakest of the three. not horrible but the story was weak and only the effects made it worthwhile.
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 5:05 am
by Tormentius
28 Weeks Later - 2/10
It was a steamy pile that gets its only 2 points for some good effects near the end.
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 12:13 pm
by Jackal
Don Carlos wrote:Xmen 3 (again) 8/10
Love it, absolutly brilliant film
I know the FX supervisor from that movie.
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 12:34 pm
by Ryoki
Tormentius wrote:28 Weeks Later - 2/10
It was a steamy pile that gets its only 2 points for some good effects near the end.
Really? I quite liked the first one...
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 2:02 pm
by Jackal
Tormentius wrote:28 Weeks Later - 2/10
It was a steamy pile that gets its only 2 points for some good effects near the end.
Hrm, I would've given it about a 7 I think. Maybe a 6. I thought it was very entertaining. The prologue was excellent.
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 2:04 pm
by Underpants?
sure you're not letting your zombie compass misguide you on this one, friend?
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 2:13 pm
by LawL
Tormentius wrote:28 Weeks Later - 2/10
It was a steamy pile that gets its only 2 points for some good effects near the end.
Exactly.
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 3:34 pm
by Tormentius
Ryoki wrote:
Really? I quite liked the first one...
So did I and this one had potential but fell short IMO.
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 4:39 pm
by Don Carlos
Jackal wrote:Don Carlos wrote:Xmen 3 (again) 8/10
Love it, absolutly brilliant film
I know the FX supervisor from that movie.
Tell him he did a top job with the film. He should be honoured.
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 5:47 pm
by Jackal
Don Carlos wrote:Jackal wrote:Don Carlos wrote:Xmen 3 (again) 8/10
Love it, absolutly brilliant film
I know the FX supervisor from that movie.
Tell him he did a top job with the film. He should be honoured.
I shall.
Re: My zombie compass. You could be right.