Quake3World

fandriods?

^

iWin...fuck u...

Pauly wrote:iSheep

iCan't afford

lol iPoor ppl...

shaft wrote:fandriods?

Considering I still have an active 3Gs and a 3G before that, no.

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:

shaft wrote:fandriods?

Considering I still have an active 3Gs ...

reason for that is?

Tsakali wrote: reason for that is?

My corp doesn't support Exchange for Android until November.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OyQzonIlDM

pew pew

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:

Tsakali wrote: reason for that is?

My corp doesn't support Exchange for Android until November.

ahh! carry on my good sir

Big Kahuna Burger wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OyQzonIlDM

pew pew

http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/mobile/07/ ... tml?hpt=C1

Now you just need bailing wire and you're all set, hoss

You mean for my Apple iPhone 4, right?

Yes, because that hardware issue is ALL iphone 4's. Don't play stupid, all of the iphone 4's are defective out of the gate. Not so with the Evo.

Next.

i guess its a problem for backwoods morons who can't get a decent signal....lol idiots need to move...

all they have to do is re-market it as a mini iPad
just another slick gadget that doesn't really do shit

got em

you sound up set

REEEE! Apple calls press conference on iPhone 4 issue

Aw, 4.1 didn't fix the issue. How surprising.

Wait, am I to understand that you can't fix shitty hardware design with software updates? What? Really?

so on friday either apple is doing a recall or giving away free bumpers with a promise to fix all future phones? whats the story?...

Recall is going to cost them too much. I think they're going for free rubbers. rofl.

LOL GG

http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2010/07/14/ ... to-mod-it/

bitWISE wrote:LOL GG

http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2010/07/14/ ... to-mod-it/

I doubt it's a hardware thing to be honest. While I do think the security method is harsh and unwanted at the very least, I don't entirely follow the author's reasoning. He says that "if you want to make it difficult to hack, that’s fine". Why is that fine and disabling the device is not fine? I see how there's a difference between the two, but if he claims that he should be able to do anything with the device once he's bought it, then any effort the manufacturer of the phone puts into stopping him from doing just that is equally wrong.

His claim that Android thrives on openness is also a bit off the mark. It thrives because of it's open source nature, sure, but that doesn not include installing hacked ROMs or jailbreaking phones in other ways. It's equally possible to do these things with Apple phones.

To be honest, while I disagree with the system Motorola incorporated in the phone, the whole thing reads a bit like an Apple fan that wants to "NOT RECOMMEND!!!" an Android phone after the whole Consumer Reports debacle. Therefore I have trouble believing him on his word and accepting that this fuse system really is what he says it is.

Last but not least, this has very little to do with Android itself. If it's ment as an Android vs iPhone thing, then it's a pointless excercise.

So when discussing the iPhone, things to do with AT&T and things to do with hardware are fair game. But Android is only a piece of software so any problems related to hardware or carrier are totally unrelated? Kinda seems like we're comparing Apples (ha!) to Oranges at this point. You get applauded for allowing diversity but any negative things at all that come out of it have to be ignored? That's fucking bullshit.