Page 182 of 535
Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:07 pm
by obsidian
The other thumb is holding onto the camera but it's also up.
8/10. They tried too hard with the humor, but otherwise totally awesome.
Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:12 pm
by Ryoki
Princess Mononoke 7/10
Studio Gibli is awesomeness, but i enjoyed some of their later stuff more. This dragged on a bit too much, and could have been more absurd and bewildering.
Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:15 pm
by mik0rs
Grudge wrote:lol/10

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:20 pm
by 7zark7
obsidian wrote:
.
Your official
Geek with helmet club jacket is now in the mail.
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 3:54 am
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
The Boss Of It All- Lars Von Trier makes a comedy.
Very good, and the tension between the Danes and Icelanders is riveting.
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:41 am
by [xeno]Julios
Pride 25 - Body Blow
fantastic fights - it's the one where big nog and fedor face each other for the first time.
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:55 am
by sliver
Transformers: 5/10
Jesus fucking god. I am not being a film buff elitist here -- I like mindless action as much as the next guy -- but this was on a level with Aliesn Vs Predator. Interesting visuals (not mind-blowing, just cool), everything else as terrible as it could possibly be. I think I groaned after at least 33% of the lines. Just painful.
EDIT: And don't give me the "well people see it for the action" crap. I saw Shooter, and it was a terrible film too but at least the characters spoke like human beings. This was worse than saturday morning cartoon dialogue. Over the Hedge certainly had better screenwriting than this. Ren and Stimpy have better fucking dialogue than this. The Emperor's New Groove, just as one example, is proof that a movie intended for kids can still have interesting, listenable dialogue. This was just absolute shite. It's Michael Bay; he gets the budget he wants to make the movies he wants. Bad Boys 2 was no The Big Sleep, it sure wasnt the Maltese Falcon or Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, but the lines worked. The actors had a clue. This was completely missing from Transformers and it ruined what could have been a good summer blockbuster. Pirates 2 and 3? Bloated CGI-heavy motherfuckers, but completely watchable. This? Not at all. Turn off your hearing aid and close your eyes till the guy beside you pops wood at the next fight scene. And I didn't even find the fight scenes particularly impressive, beyond watching all the stuff that WASN'T cgi and imagining the work that went into making it all move and explode etc. to coincide perfectly with the SFX that didn't exist until far, far later in the production process.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:14 am
by andyman
tranformers - all/all
it was funny seeing the soldiers and the base in qatar. they are complete opposites of what it really is lol
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:36 am
by ForM
Apocalypto
Excellent flick. Well worth a watch.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:44 am
by andyman
ForM wrote:Apocalypto
Excellent flick. Well worth a watch.
YES, that movie really took me by surprise
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:18 pm
by Jackal
The Hills Have Eyes 2 - lol/10
It's worth it for the gore but it had nothing on the remake of the original, which I thought was fantastic.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:20 pm
by Tsakali_
Jackal wrote:The Hills Have Eyes 2 - lol/10
It's worth it for the gore but it had nothing on the remake of the original, which I thought was fantastic.
I ejected 30 minutes into it :icon26:
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:22 am
by Hannibal
Transformers: 6/10 Moments of sheer enjoyment punctuated by too long stretches of mindless jibber jabber. The script was craptastically bad...usually this will kill a movie outright for me, but the robot action outshone everything else.
The Battletech universe is STILL the great unmined setting for a summer blockbuster...tons of great characters and storylines just waiting for a non-retard to step up to the plate.
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 7:54 pm
by Tormentius
1408 5/10
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:35 pm
by Grudge
The Good Shepherd - 7/10
It has the same vibe as Syriana, very understated and everything isn't all spelled out nice and clear like most Hollywood films. The narrative is more traditional though.
Rather slow, moody pacing. Not your traditional suspenseful spy thriller, but a bit more contemplative. I think you need to be in the right mood to appreciate this film. If you're not set up for the slow pacing you'd probably not be able to appreciate it. I liked it though.
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:32 am
by sliver
Fat Girl (A Ma Soeur) - 9/10
A French film by Catherine Breillat, it's about the sibling rivalry between two sisters, one of them smokingly hot and the other fat & dumpy, and the family environment (and by extension, the society) which created them. Also an exploration of sexuality, especially sexual awakening (the sisters are 12 and 15, and the older [hot] one is seduced by a college student), and the power dynamics involved in sexual relationships. Absolutely breathtaking.
Smokin' Aces - 6/10
Good cast, relatively stylish filmmaking (if cliché in all its ADD-edited, hyper-stylized violent glory), but ridiculously plotted and ending with an incredibly destructive and incredibly childish act of revenge and spite which the film on the whole seems to validate and approve of. Almost every character seemed overly familiar (there was clearly not a lot of originality going into this), yet the better players managed to make something interesting out of their parts, and the relentless gunplay is interesting enough, but still somehow it dragged in parts and I certainly didn't care about any of the characters so there was never any sense of loss or triumph.
I think I saw another film recently but I can't remember what it was and it's really bugging me.
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:43 am
by Captain
Star Wars Episode III - 9/10
It's my favourite from the prequel trilogy but it could've (and should've) been so much bigger and better. More war sequences for example. Although Zark may assassinate me if I give it anything lower than 9
War of the Worlds - 8/10
The tripods were amazingly well done, from the way they look to those deep, resonating sounds they make. Just too bad the classic Hollywood touchy-feely ending made it a bit hard to swallow.
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 2:03 am
by ForM
Yep its a rant.
Now I'm no real paid movie critic, nor do I wish to be someone like them fags you see on Television. But at least I know a proper film when I see one. You know the kind. A decent flick. A well done one. Something like the 10 Commandments or, Cool Hand Luke or, well, theres fucking hundreds of them, you pick one.
Now in my day I have viewed well over thousands. Both long and short, lasting HOURS and less than a moment. (The moment ones that you see in slow motion that hang in your brain till you pass away. You know the ones, the ones you wish you could put on film. The ones that actually happened to you.) Any film that is over 3 hours in length better have a reason. And theres TONS that don't.
But rather than critique all of the thousands I have seen and wished I could get that time back, I'm going to pick on one.
One film that Sucked!
The Hitcher (new version)
It SUCKED!
It sucked so much I knew it was going to suck before I plopped it in the DVD tray. Let me tell you, thats a lot of suckage.
Ok so I watched it. Who was that Neanderthal of a man that played the Hitcher this time? Well, he sucked. He was so unbelievable that even my cat sat here, smirking, at the suckage that he tried to portray. I mean this guy fuckin sucked.
Then there was the Girlfriend.
Ya ok she was hot, but she was STUPID, and she SUCKED! I wont even get into the pansy ass that was her boyfriend. But he sucked too.
I mean jesus crist on a fuckin shit pile of flies covered in clubbed baby seals. How much can one movie SUCK?
I'll tell you how much.
It SUCKED so much that even Hitler could have gotten an orgasm from his grave over the suckage. The power of the suckage of this film is just that strong.
Now the first version, while you knew it was going to suck, was a rather decent film. Almost believable, but this remake, well, it fuckin SUCKED!
Anyway, thats my view on the new Hitcher flick.
Dont bother.
It fuckin sucked.
I could be speaking out of my ass, but it's not likely.
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 3:01 am
by 7zark7
What we have here...is a failure to communicate.
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 3:03 am
by 7zark7
Disturbia 6/10
A lame re-telling of rear window.
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 9:25 pm
by Doombrain
transformers. 8 - 10.
good old sit down, turn off and enjoy. i was shocked to see no yank flags though, gg Bay.
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 9:28 pm
by shaft
wb doombrain
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:40 am
by sliver
Beowulf & Grendel: 8/10
Interesting take on the legend, nice to see it done without CGI bullshit, just "real life" as much as it could possibly be. Gritty and vicious but with a heart somewhere in all that bearded gristle. It's nice to see such a good cast without any "too-famous" faces in it: Gerard Butler (this movie totally inspired his casting in 300), Stellan Skarsgard, Sarah Polley, Tony Curran, and I think I'm forgetting someone important but oh well. And of course since it was all shot on location in Iceland or somesuch place, the landscapes are absolutely beautiful.
I am eagerly awaiting the next big-budget take on the legend: director Robert Zemeckis and writer Neil Gaiman's Beowulf, which is coming out in November, starring Anthony Hopkins, John Malkovich, Crispin Glover, Brendan Gleeson and Angelina Jolie, and using the next generation of the motion-capture technology that went into Zemeckis's "Polar Express" a couple years ago.
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 1:43 am
by Nightshade
Captain Mazda wrote:
War of the Worlds - 8/10
wtf? NO MAZDA, NO. That movie was a complete shitfest.
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 1:52 am
by Magnus
ForM wrote:Yep its a rant.
Now I'm no real paid movie critic, nor do I wish to be someone like them fags you see on Television. But at least I know a proper film when I see one. You know the kind. A decent flick. A well done one. Something like the 10 Commandments or, Cool Hand Luke or, well, theres fucking hundreds of them, you pick one.
Now in my day I have viewed well over thousands. Both long and short, lasting HOURS and less than a moment. (The moment ones that you see in slow motion that hang in your brain till you pass away. You know the ones, the ones you wish you could put on film. The ones that actually happened to you.) Any film that is over 3 hours in length better have a reason. And theres TONS that don't.
But rather than critique all of the thousands I have seen and wished I could get that time back, I'm going to pick on one.
One film that Sucked!
The Hitcher (new version)
It SUCKED!
It sucked so much I knew it was going to suck before I plopped it in the DVD tray. Let me tell you, thats a lot of suckage.
Ok so I watched it. Who was that Neanderthal of a man that played the Hitcher this time? Well, he sucked. He was so unbelievable that even my cat sat here, smirking, at the suckage that he tried to portray. I mean this guy fuckin sucked.
Then there was the Girlfriend.
Ya ok she was hot, but she was STUPID, and she SUCKED! I wont even get into the pansy ass that was her boyfriend. But he sucked too.
I mean jesus crist on a fuckin shit pile of flies covered in clubbed baby seals. How much can one movie SUCK?
I'll tell you how much.
It SUCKED so much that even Hitler could have gotten an orgasm from his grave over the suckage. The power of the suckage of this film is just that strong.
Now the first version, while you knew it was going to suck, was a rather decent film. Almost believable, but this remake, well, it fuckin SUCKED!
Anyway, thats my view on the new Hitcher flick.
Dont bother.
It fuckin sucked.
I could be speaking out of my ass, but it's not likely.
So you are saing that it sucked? Am I still a bit unclear on this?
