Page 3 of 3
cpu dependent
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:03 am
by Cynips
At 1280x1024, High, 2xAA and Advanced setting at highest I get 53.24
while at 640x480, Low, No AA and Advanced settings at lowest I get 66.64,
so yes, it's relatively CPU dependent.
Athlon 64 3200+
1GB RAM
X800 Pro
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:14 am
by MidnightQ4
How is everyone doing the timedemo?
At first I was doing simply:
This doesn't work however. I got pretty much 43-45 fps no matter how low or high I set my config.
Apparenyly you have to do:
playnettimedemo demoname
Can anyone comment on this more?
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 5:27 am
by shaft
90fps
Low quality config 110 fov.
A64 4000+ @ 2.7Ghz
2gb ram
x800 XT PE (AGP)
Quite the improvment.
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:11 am
by feralslash
i got 67.3fps using the ggl demo
barton 2500 @2.2ghz
1gb ram
6600gt stock speeds (latest drivers)
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:19 am
by PieceMaker
MidnightQ4:
I ran the D|S-Syn-'s nettimedemo as follows:
- I renamed the file to ggl.netdemo
I put the file in my demos folder under q4base
I started Q4.
Brought the console down.
typed playNetTimeDemo ggl.netdemo
Then waited to see the FPS's in the console.
ggl=34.77 fps
800x600 high quality
p4 2.2
geforce 6800 ultra @4x agp ( motherboard limited )
512 megs pc800 rdram
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:35 am
by feralslash
i ran the demo again using my so called highquality-for-benchmarking config
got 44.58 fps
@ 1024, high, multisample 4, aniso 8
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 10:28 pm
by Creepy Longhair
ggl 74fps
Settings on high quality 800x600
All advanced options off
64 3000+ @ 2.66GHz
1Gb dual channel
256Mb 6600GT (stock speed)
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:59 pm
by jester!
47fps
P4 3 gig
1 gig of ram
Geforce 3 Ti 200
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:55 am
by DevastatioN
I Also have a 6600gt pci xpress 128mb.. It does really well... Ive got a 3ghz p4, with a gig of corsair.. and I average 50-63 fps on online play ctf with a 1280 x 1024 resolution and high quality settings.
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 8:19 am
by jokermar
34.21fps
amd athlon 3000+
1024mb ddr ram
ati radeon 9200se 128mb ddr
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:30 pm
by SOAPboy
D|S-Syn- wrote:Okay, I just made a quicky timedemo since there no demos included.
There are two types of demos, Demo and NetDemo. I have no clue what the difference is, however here is a quick timedemo I made
http://media.ggl.com/files/ggl-timedemo.zip
Extract that file, and put it in your "C:\Program Files\id Software\Quake 4\q4base\demos" directory. If you do not have that demos directory, create it and put this file there.
Next load up q4 and type "playNetTimeDemo ggl-timedemo.netdemo"
It's slow and will take a bit but when it's done you can check the console for the FPS #'s.
I got 60.
AMD 3200XP w/ 6800GT + 768MB RAM
The other 'Demo' type creates huge demo files and their timedemo actually pops up a box at the end giving you the info. I wonder if this NetDemo stuff is some sort of legacy timedemo that id software put in until people have no problems downloading a 90MB timedemo. Or a really huge Demo.
60.24
1280x1024 Ultra Detail, 2x AA
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 1:59 pm
by Victrix
p4 3.2c, bfg gf6800 oc, gig of ddr400
1024 high
59.97
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:01 pm
by alright
Yeah...this thread makes it quite apparent that it is, very much so, CPU based.
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:51 pm
by Tormentius
eviscuno wrote:ajerara wrote:what else would you suggest?
what do u mean? im just looking through everyones scores, and people with not so great systems getting really good fps while others while better comps get much worse FPS, its a bit frustrating/confusing
You'll always notice fluctuations in scores like this. It depends a lot on how well the system is maintained and how many apps and services are running in the background and taking up CPU resources.
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 5:02 pm
by SOAPboy
Tormentius wrote:eviscuno wrote:ajerara wrote:what else would you suggest?
what do u mean? im just looking through everyones scores, and people with not so great systems getting really good fps while others while better comps get much worse FPS, its a bit frustrating/confusing
You'll always notice fluctuations in scores like this. It depends a lot on how well the system is maintained and how many apps and services are running in the background and taking up CPU resources.
And how picmiped, and if they really are running the settings they say..
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 3:57 pm
by raw
Here's my timedemo score. This is with my shitty ATI Raedon x300 which I am ditching soon for a GF 6600GT.
3768 frames in 76616 ms: 49.18 fps
640x480 
)
Specs:
P4 3.2Ghz HT
1GB DDR 533 Mhz Ram
160GB Seagate SATA drive
ATI Raedon X300 PCIE
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 3:25 am
by D'Artagnan
Just did the timedemo; ggl-timedemo.netdemo
and got-----82.96 FPS
Specs:
K8N Neo2 Platinum
AMD ATHLON XP64 3500+ SOCKET 939
1024 MB DDR 400 MHZ DUAL KIT ( 2 X 512 MB ) OCZ
Leadtek 6800gt , 256 meg
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 3:26 am
by D'Artagnan
Got another question, when you do a demo, where does it go on youre hard drive, cause i just did 2 demo when playing and i can't find them ???
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:00 am
by jester!
In demos in your baseq4 folder, or whatever mod you where using.