Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 6:43 am
You read entire threads then go back and decide who you're going to individually respond to? Well, that explains a lot. 
Page 3 of 6
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 6:44 am
Well, yeah. Dumbass. Do you always gon into a discussion half cocked with half the info? Oh yeah, forgot who I was talking to. Lol.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 6:47 am
Do you always have to read an entire thread then go back and read a post for a second timeto respond to it so you think you've "got all the info"? Oh yeah, I forgot how retarded you are. loL.
Oh yeah, I forgot how retarded you are. loL.Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 6:48 am
Second time? Idiot.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 6:52 am
That's right retard. If you don't respond to it after first reading it, but by reading the entire thread, then coming back to respond to it, then you are reading it for a second time. Unless you just close your eyes and randomly click your mouse all over the screen hoping that when you finally opened your eyes again, somewhere along the line you managed to click a quote button. And incredibly the quote button is that of the person who you indeed wish to quote.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 6:54 am
No you fucking dumbass, you only read the 'new' posts, not the entire thread again. Lol, what a fucking moron.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 6:55 am
The Void is where it's at!
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 6:56 am
But according to you, you only post replies once the entire thread is read. If you're on page 3 of a thread, how do you reply to a post on page 1 without reading it again?scourge34 wrote:No you fucking dumbass, you only read the 'new' posts, not the entire thread again. Lol, what a fucking moron.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:00 am
Uhhh, you remember what you read. It's a simple look for and quote after that you idiot.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:06 am
But how do you know which post to quote dickhead?
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:08 am
Derr, memory. You seem to have a very limited one. You really are dumb.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:10 am
Really, you remember it's exact position on the page and the exact location of the quote button? lol, that's incredible.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:11 am
Yep. Jellus?
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:12 am
Like you wouldn't believe.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:13 am
Actually, here's a theory. Personal icon. General position on page, general length of post, quotes in post, no quotes in post, easy to remember. Yeah?
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:15 am
This one seems to be taking a bit.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:17 am
Here's a far more plausible theory:
Know which post you're quoting by reading it.
Know which post you're quoting by reading it.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:17 am
I did the first time. Lol.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:18 am
Don't be mad at me because you can only handle the information that is in front of you at the moment.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:20 am
Then you had to go back, check out the general position on page, general length of post, check out whether there's quotes or not (and of course read it for the second time) for each and every post you wish to reply to, when you could have simply just hit the quote button upon the first reading.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:21 am
Don't be mad at me because you can't handle the information that is in front of you at the moment.scourge34 wrote:Don't be mad at me because you can only handle the information that is in front of you at the moment.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:22 am
besides, if you read the enitire thread again, wouldn't you be back at square one if you had no retention of memory?
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:22 am
Is that your excuse?
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:23 am
And missed out on any subsequent post that might make your reply useless or redundant. Good job.Law wrote:Then you had to go back, check out the general position on page, general length of post, check out whether there's quotes or not (and of course read it for the second time) for each and every post you wish to reply to, when you could have simply just hit the quote button upon the first reading.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:24 am
Excuse? Lol. Reaching now.Law wrote:Is that your excuse?