Quake3World

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:21 pm**

the only absolute here is that arguing with splish never amounts to anything

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:22 pm**

except showing how much of a bitter retard Grudge is

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:24 pm**

Ok, let me explain. You seem to have not understood seremtan's argument, mistaking it for a change of topic. It wasn't, so your comment doesn't make any real sense, i.e you're the one who's sprouting nonsense.

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:26 pm**

Grudge wrote:Ok, let me explain. You seem to have not understood seremtan's argument, mistaking it for a change of topic. It wasn't, so your comment doesn't make any real sense, i.e you're the one who's sprouting nonsense.

It must seem that way to you because you never understood what I meant by "nothing is absolute".

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:27 pm**

Please explain.

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:28 pm**

Argueing with ShitSplash is alot like fucking sandpaper....a little amusing but mostly painful.

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:38 pm**

Grudge wrote:Please explain.

"nothing is absolute" => If you change the premise, you have to change the method.

You however never understood any of this and just thought:

"SplishSplash said something. I hate SplishSplash because he has an unpopular opinion about a movie. If I attack him, others will like me.

What did he say? I don't understand. But maybe it was stupid. MY CHANCE FOR VICTORY! I'll fire off a scalding post!"

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:45 pm**

SplishSplash wrote:
Grudge wrote:Please explain.
"nothing is absolute" => If you change the premise, you have to change the method.

Oh, so you were actually agreeing with seremtan when he was criticizing you for not defending your argument that everything is motivated by people's desire to get rich?

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:28 pm**

he switched from 'getting rich' to 'pursuing your goals'

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:49 pm**

Grudge wrote: Oh, so you were actually agreeing with seremtan when he was criticizing you for not defending your argument that everything is motivated by people's desire to get rich?

Must be hard to understand for a bitter old fool like you.

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:07 pm**

ey i understood fine as usual

so yea get monies :icon14:

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:19 pm**

who the fuck needs to work...just grow it and sell it like I do...simple enough?

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:29 pm**

This does seem like it has some serious potential to be abused for the special interests of companies who want to use things harmful the environment, wildlife and humans.

As for Hillary, I hate that bitch too. I don't even understand why she went after GTA: SA and she just seems like a person hell bent on political revenge for something. I personally like Obama Barak. I truly hope that the election comes down to Barak and Giuliani because I hear that Giuliani has some liberal domestic policy. I would personally vote for Barak, but Giuliani wouldn't be too terrible. So please, no Hillary.

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 7:36 pm**

funny thing is, fox news seems to be painting barak obama as some kind of al-qaeda fifth columnist, but in truth he's just a right-wing fucknut in liberal clothes

http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle ... emID=11936

Quake3World

bush just pulled a hitler move...