Quake3World

The shirt does, yes.

Yeah, guy looks like a douchebag. It's just as tasteless as wearing some Ed Hardy bullshit.

all the designs are the same: somewhat symmetrical and over sized imagery covering as much of the shirt as possible from the waistline up.

Once I saw a guy that had a tribal tattoo creeping out of his left sleeve, only to notice that the tribal design on his sleeve and shirt lined up exactly.... that's pretty fucking gay, but still not as gay as affliction shirts (if you ask me). Another reason I don't 'go to the bar' 'go to da club'... too many 'bros'

holy gayness... http://blog.hoodiesandgoodies.com/categ ... k-hoodies/

jaegerbombs

jaegerbombs

my friends all have the same haircut lol

bitWISE wrote:So we're not allowed to like designer t-shirts because someone else says so?

Since you're not going to make an attempt to link some decent affliction designs, on someone who doesn't look like a half-baked fucktard....I suppose this picture screams gay too right?

Nobody is saying you aren't allowed to like them, and none of us dislike them because someone else tells us to. We just all agree that we don't care for them. They look too busy to me - but if someone likes them, great.

Is a big guy wearing one with a girl who is half as hot as she thinks she is supposed to change our minds about them?

i think that's his roommate

bitWISE wrote:So we're not allowed to like designer t-shirts because someone else says so?

Since you're not going to make an attempt to link some decent affliction designs, on someone who doesn't look like a half-baked fucktard....I suppose this picture screams gay too right?

Your post really needed a (no homo) thrown in at the end there.