Quake3World

watch the videos...the answer is no...but the whole world already knows this... - u...

so they crashed in one side, disapeared, then come out the other

nope...

then if the plane debris come out the other side of the building as an explanation to to one of my arguements, then how did it happen without traveling through the building

so i guess ur one of the only ppl who never saw what happened on 911?

lyour the one who said the plane debris come out the other side of the building witout traveling through the core

not me

dude...they went thru the buildings from corner to corner...u never saw 911 videos or pics? the core is in the middle...way in the middle..the palnes would have to hit directly and fly thru the opposite side...

understand?

moron alert?

yes and im sure the boeing is the size of a needle missing everything important holding the building up

Yeah, it started ringing like mad the second you posted.
IF you think that the towers were brought down by explosives, you're completely fucking retarded. FULL FUCKING STOP.

looks as if its close enough to the core to me, plus the initial explosion and all that shit

c mon dude, get your head out your ass

We need a moron clause in the rules, stating if you act this fucking stupid, you get bant. :icon14: :icon14: :icon14:

(to freakaloin of course)

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/collapse.html

The views of someone qualified. (unlike geoof)

lets see, the tallest building ever imploded is 493 ft.
it took 12 people 24 days to set up
had 2,728 lbs. of explosives
4,118 seperate charges in 1.100 locations and 36,000 ft. of detonating cord.

wtc was two towers at 1,368 ft.
so of the thousands and thousands of people that worked there, nobody ever saw any thing fishy like, oh say, a construction crew of about 50, hauling around 10 tons of gear marked explosive inside and running 100's of thousands of feet of cable up and down the building for say 10-12 weeks before 9/11?

yeah, right.

4g3nt_Smith wrote:We need a moron clause in the rules, stating if you act this fucking stupid, you get bant. :icon14: :icon14: :icon14:

(to freakaloin of course)

cheers dude, wasnt sure if i was explaing myself well enough then

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/collapse.html

The views of someone qualified. (unlike geoof)

thanky sire, its kinda like my theory, lol

Maiden wrote:lets see, the tallest building ever imploded is 493 ft.
it took 12 people 24 days to set up
had 2,728 lbs. of explosives
4,118 seperate charges in 1.100 locations and 36,000 ft. of detonating cord.

wtc was two towers at 1,368 ft.
so of the thousands and thousands of people that worked there, nobody ever saw any thing fishy like, oh say, a construction crew of about 50, hauling around 10 tons of gear marked explosive inside and running 100's of thousands of feet of cable up and down the building for say 10-12 weeks before 9/11?

yeah, right.

yer i was going to mention that but forgot, nice one guy

also, dum dum dum

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4261315.stm

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/collapse.html

The views of someone qualified. (unlike geoof)

NOVA: I think some people were surprised when they saw this massive 110-story building collapse into a rubble pile only a few stories tall.

Eagar: Well, like most buildings, the World Trade Center was mostly air. It looked like a huge building if you walked inside, but it was just like this room we're in. The walls are a very small fraction of the total room. The World Trade Center collapse proved that with a 110-story building, if 95 percent of it's air, as was the case here, you're only going to have about five stories of rubble at the bottom after it falls.


yeah...he sounds real qualified...govt shill...

lol...hydrocarbon fuel explosions create little outward force...its not like a he explosive nitwit...that fireball will burn a person but would do shit to steel...

losCHUNK wrote:

looks as if its close enough to the core to me, plus the initial explosion and all that shit

c mon dude, get your head out your ass

yeah right...now they have wireless detonators...i think the govt has the man power and time...

Maiden wrote:lets see, the tallest building ever imploded is 493 ft.
it took 12 people 24 days to set up
had 2,728 lbs. of explosives
4,118 seperate charges in 1.100 locations and 36,000 ft. of detonating cord.

wtc was two towers at 1,368 ft.
so of the thousands and thousands of people that worked there, nobody ever saw any thing fishy like, oh say, a construction crew of about 50, hauling around 10 tons of gear marked explosive inside and running 100's of thousands of feet of cable up and down the building for say 10-12 weeks before 9/11?

yeah, right.

well the not so explosive fuel done a really good job of hiding it in that picture

also, it still looks pretty close to the core to me

well it is close to the core..but a big explosion from fuel does not have destructive force like ur thinking...

so, fuck the explosion, its close to the core

peeekash

Yeah, and the crystal palace should never have burned, it's scentifically unpossible

cose to the core...destroyed core...are different....we are being lied to...wake up...

that pic looks like its done one over on the core

i suppose it would be like trying to stand with one of our legs broken

and when i used close to, i really mean in to

And the fact that the pyramids are still standing means that the Tay Bridge should never have collapsed, after all they were built using completely different methods.