Geert Wilders

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: Geert Wilders

Post by Ryoki »

No, he means that some people get emotional about stuff and this reflects in the way they (would) vote - but when some time has passed and people have collectively calmed down about whatever upset them, their voting behavior is suddenly very different.

IE Wilders would pwnz0r elections if they were held now, according to the polls - but unfortunately for him he's gotta wait a bit before that happens and people will likely have calmed down by then and vote differently. Unless of course he manages to get entangled in another scandal by that time.

Would like to add that i think Fortuyn is a dubious example of this, iirc the man wasn't exactly leading in the polls but he wasn't doing too shabby either before he was offed - and while he did get a lot of sympathy votes after he was killed, it's also worth wondering how many people recognized the fact that his party (an exotic collection of morons and thugs if i ever saw one) would melt away of infighting and sheer stupidity without his leadership and made this a reason to not vote for him.
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36011
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: Geert Wilders

Post by seremtan »

that doesn't explain 'revocation'
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: Geert Wilders

Post by Ryoki »

He meant it as 'change their mind about whom to vote for', not literally declaring votes illegitimate or something... c'mon now, this ain't Zimbabwe.
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36011
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: Geert Wilders

Post by seremtan »

revocation doesn't mean that

revoke = intrekken
change mind = een verandering van de geest

according to google moon language translator
bikkeldesnikkel
Posts: 1145
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 7:54 pm

Re: Geert Wilders

Post by bikkeldesnikkel »

The ones who voted for Fortuyn before, 'revoked' their vote by voting for another party because they changed their mind.
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36011
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: Geert Wilders

Post by seremtan »

no, they changed their mind the second time around. that doesn't revoke their first vote

for the last time: revoke =/= change mind
bikkeldesnikkel
Posts: 1145
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 7:54 pm

Re: Geert Wilders

Post by bikkeldesnikkel »

seremtan wrote:no, they changed their mind the second time around. that doesn't revoke their first vote

for the last time: revoke =/= change mind
semantics.
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Geert Wilders

Post by Massive Quasars »

Enough both of you.
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: Geert Wilders

Post by Ryoki »

seremtanics!
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32581
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Geert Wilders

Post by MKJ »

revoked by the people themselves, not the state.
seremtanics indeed :)

intrekken; revoke, retract, rectify
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36011
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: Geert Wilders

Post by seremtan »

lol, three dutchees trying to teach me english
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36011
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: Geert Wilders

Post by seremtan »

...proposed by Pakistan on behalf of Islamic states...
fortunately it's only the UNGA, so only those faggot countries in europe will take any notice

oh wai-
Post Reply