PS3 pic+specs

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by Don Carlos »

Odium, i have dropped my psp off my desk and hits hit the floor and my UMD has remained in there and worked fine. My PSP takes a battering round the office and its perfect? I see no problems and i have a Jap one
Where were you when the West was defeated?
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/doncarlos83][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/gbar/doncarlos83.gif[/img][/url]
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

reefsurfer wrote:I like it.
why, the pics look fake and the spec is shit next to the xbox even with it's cell CPU, doesn't look like it can stand up to it.
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by Don Carlos »

Doombrain wrote:
reefsurfer wrote:I like it.
why, the pics look fake and the spec is shit next to the xbox even with it's cell CPU, doesn't look like it can stand up to it.
The specs are shit
The whople thing behind the CELL CPU is that there are
more than one of them. Think that thing in Terminator 2
if you will. It will have 4 - 8 small 500 - 600 MHZ processors
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Post by o'dium »

Don Carlos wrote:Odium, i have dropped my psp off my desk and hits hit the floor and my UMD has remained in there and worked fine. My PSP takes a battering round the office and its perfect? I see no problems and i have a Jap one
Then your lucky. You know wht the difference is? About 1mm off a button. Something crazy like that, thats stopped the PSP being launched in the UK for so long.

I'm not saying you will run into these problems, just that you could. And its ab ig problem, sony lost a lot of money on US sales from faulty PSPs.
reefsurfer
Posts: 4065
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 8:00 am

Post by reefsurfer »

Doombrain wrote:
reefsurfer wrote:I like it.
why, the pics look fake and the spec is shit next to the xbox even with it's cell CPU, doesn't look like it can stand up to it.
Assuming you mean the first pics.. i think the design is pretty slick and i like the front hatchet, but yea, its probably fake db... but if it wasent i wouldent mind it looking like that.
The controler looks like a cross between dreamcast and xbox now though..
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

Don Carlos wrote:
Doombrain wrote:
reefsurfer wrote:I like it.
why, the pics look fake and the spec is shit next to the xbox even with it's cell CPU, doesn't look like it can stand up to it.
The specs are shit
The whople thing behind the CELL CPU is that there are
more than one of them. Think that thing in Terminator 2
if you will. It will have 4 - 8 small 500 - 600 MHZ processors
i know what a CELL CPU is fool
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Post by o'dium »

Yes but, like the x-box, if its not using one of them it doesn't just "add it to the power" of another instruction, it sits dormant until its needed.
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by Don Carlos »

Doombrain wrote:
Don Carlos wrote:
Doombrain wrote: why, the pics look fake and the spec is shit next to the xbox even with it's cell CPU, doesn't look like it can stand up to it.
The specs are shit
The whople thing behind the CELL CPU is that there are
more than one of them. Think that thing in Terminator 2
if you will. It will have 4 - 8 small 500 - 600 MHZ processors
i know what a CELL CPU is fool
*kiss*
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Planet Quake just dropped a bomb shell of exclusive news!

Post by o'dium »

Planet Quake just dropped a bomb shell of exclusive news!

QUAKE 4 IS COMING OUT ON THE XBOX 360!!! YOU HEARD IT AT PLANET QUAKE FIRST GUYS!

http://www.planetquake.com/

EDIT: Sorry, this is id Software that just made the news...

Wow guys, come on id, get with the times, we have known about this for a few days now :|
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: Planet Quake just dropped a bomb shell of exclusive news

Post by Don Carlos »

o'dium wrote:Planet Quake just dropped a bomb shell of exclusive news!

QUAKE 4 IS COMING OUT ON THE XBOX 360!!! YOU HEARD IT AT PLANET QUAKE FIRST GUYS!

http://www.planetquake.com/
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST ON A SMALL AEROPLANE WITH THE LANDING CARRAGE DOWN
losCHUNK
Posts: 16019
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 7:00 am

Post by losCHUNK »

FUCK ME WITH A BALLOON IN A CESSNA
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
Pauly
Posts: 3460
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Pauly »

Wow OMG*



* I couldn't give a fuck
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Post by andyman »

im looking forward to halo 3, personally
bork[e]
Posts: 4357
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 8:00 am

Post by bork[e] »

bwahahaha.

edit: Holy shit this thread is moving...lol at the fake image on page one. :drool:
SoM
Posts: 8489
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 1999 8:00 am

Re: Planet Quake just dropped a bomb shell of exclusive news

Post by SoM »

o'dium wrote:Planet Quake just dropped a bomb shell of exclusive news!

QUAKE 4 IS COMING OUT ON THE XBOX 360!!! YOU HEARD IT AT PLANET QUAKE FIRST GUYS!

http://www.planetquake.com/

EDIT: Sorry, this is id Software that just made the news...

Wow guys, come on id, get with the times, we have known about this for a few days now :|
i heard it at shacknews first :p
[color=red][WYD][/color]S[color=red]o[/color]M
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Post by andyman »

Maybe Duke Nukem forever will come out on 360 >)
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Doombrain wrote:what's this CELL CPU. is it going to stand up to 1 TFLOP?
The cell is a lot faster than the 360 CPU. 256 GFlop vs. 45 GFlop

The 1 TFlop MS claims to achieve on the XBox is a theoretical value which can only be reached if CPU _AND_ GPU work at full capacity, at full efficiency. It's a pretty outrageous lie, really.

The PS3 will be faster than the XBox 360, but I guess the 360 will have better (more popular) games.
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Post by andyman »

I thought the big thing with cell is that it would use a broadband connection to use other ps3's cells to spread the workload or soemthing.
At least that was the info put out a long time ago.
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

andyman wrote:I thought the big thing with cell is that it would use a broadband connection to use other ps3's cells to spread the workload or soemthing.
At least that was the info put out a long time ago.
Yeah, but nobody's talking about that anymore. Sony obviously realized that TVs and toasters simply don't need that much power.

The CELL is powerful enough as it is, with 8 vector cores in addition to a PowerPC core.
dnoyc
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed May 16, 2001 7:00 am

Post by dnoyc »

woot q4 will be at e3, can't wait. :up
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Post by bitWISE »

Wtf 32k of level 1 cache? Most desktops already have 128k.
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

bitWISE wrote:Wtf 32k of level 1 cache? Most desktops already have 128k.
The XBox has 64 MB of RAM. Try playing Halo on a PC with 64 MB of RAM.

See what might be going on here?
User avatar
duffman91
Posts: 1278
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2001 8:00 am

Post by duffman91 »

Wether its fake or not, you all need to shut the fuck up. God damned morons.

All of you guys speculating on console performance or success based on technical details need to go out and read something.

Its been proven time and time again that hardware capabilities of consoles have little to no effect on its success. (Specially since its up to the developers to use an architecture's full potential)

Let's not forget that the playstation 1 was far more succesful than the N64. Even though the PS1 was clearly "underpowered".

It is a well known fact that any and all companies having anything to do with computer architecture will use buzzwords and numbers to sway the competition to one side. (Risc vs CISC computers, AMD vs Intel, Sony vs Nintendo, Sega vs Nintendo).

So you all need to shut the fuck up and stop sounding like complete and utter idiots. I expect better from this bulletin board. A bigger number does not mean "better". I can design a CPU that does nothing more than add and have it running at 10000GHZ.

Educate yourselves before sounding like idiots. The only way to trully see which company will succeed include: Number of developers supporting it, quality of games, Price(economics), and availability.
User avatar
shaft
Posts: 12473
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by shaft »

i think duffman is upset.
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Post by bitWISE »

SplishSplash wrote:
bitWISE wrote:Wtf 32k of level 1 cache? Most desktops already have 128k.
The XBox has 64 MB of RAM. Try playing Halo on a PC with 64 MB of RAM.

See what might be going on here?
Just seemed odd to have 512k of level 2 and then only 32k of level 1. Its obvioulsy a cost saving measure but it would be nice to have 128/256 instead.
Post Reply