Quake3World

Well you seem to know me pretty well despite being a forgettable character

It's not my fault you don't understand metaphors either or how they're used. A dog with 2 dicks will fuck anything that moves.

Please refer to the above image for the change in my emotional state as I read that.

It's like if I could read Ritalin.

Well if you're looking for a boner we're gonna need skype

[lvlshot]http://replygif.net/thumbnail/603.gif[/lvlshot]

OK, thread's just been murdered.

You must be new around here.

Kind of feel like I did everyone a favour here.

losCHUNK wrote:Even Assanges lawyer admitted he pushed the boundaries of what is considered legal.

Assange's lawyer: "he pushed the boundaries of what is considered legal"
the two female non-victims: "neither of us was raped by Assange"

but yeah, "they're not lawyers" - how can they possibly know if they've been raped or not?

That's funny because both were appealing the decision to drop one of the charges after the initial investigation and got it re instated through their lawyer. If they took issue with this and their Lawyer (Not NY the prosecutor), why is he still retained by one of them and wasn't sacked by the other until yrs after the 1st claim ? (havn't looked in a while so for all I know he's been sacked by both of them now).

Atleast one of them has been pretty vocal n all and still claims to have been attacked, and I believe both their Lawyers are still asking for the prosecution of Assange to go ahead.

Could she of meant she wasn't raped but molested ? (idk havn't seen the tweet) but their actions don't seem to match what you're suggesting.

Not that I wanted to get into this convo because as I said it's all speculative at best and we're not privvy to any of the info.

losCHUNK wrote:Could she of

losCHUNK doesn't want to get involved in this conversation, as it's all speculation at this point, so he's going to stop at 5000 words, as there's really not much to talk about.

Told you, I was sticking to one point because everything else is speculation.

People wanted to discuss the speculation so I did.

lol, you really live in your own private little reality don't you?

My 1st reply on this page tells you the point I'm sticking to, as through all the 1st page which underlines anything else.

You said yourself that you're speculating, so we've discussed that. Problem ?.

You are the embodiment of the colour grey. Get rid of that red font, because it should be grey. The greyest grey you can imagine. Turn ever other colour in the visible spectrum into a shade of grey, and then from that selection, pick grey. That should be your font colour.

Christ, you moan like a whore.

Very fitting since you can't get off my willy.

So, some of the charges have expired. One more expires this Tuesday, then the outstanding charge has a further five years before it expires. Prosecutor Ny has proven herself grossly incompetent. Britain continues to bitch at Ecuador for providing asylum, while Assange's attorney complains that his time in asylum already exceeds any jail time he may have had if he had been tried and prosecuted under Swedish law. And still no one with half a brain is yet convinced that the second Assange walks out of there he won't be hand-cuffed and flown directly to the US to face torture and/or indefinite detainment

Do these chumps not remember the downing of the Bolivian President's plane on false suspicions that Snowden was aboard? (he was rightfully fucking irate.) Tell me what about either of these scenarios does not scream supremely corrupt American hegemony. The fact that some people have this idea that there is anything resembling a legitimate course of justice being played out with Assange is fucking laughable.

Again I say -- USA runs the show, everyone else is more or less a puppet, and if you get caught up in that infernal machine, good fucking luck to you.

yep that pretty much sums it up

And now another torrent of assorted red letters describing the truths of some alternate reality that seems very real to one select individual.

https://stundin.is/grein/13627/key-witn ... ndictment/

A maj­or wit­n­ess in the United States’ Depart­ment of Justice ca­se against Ju­li­an Assange has admitted to fabricat­ing key accusati­ons in the indict­ment against the Wiki­leaks found­er.

more evidence of the bullshit nature of the accusations against Assange

Saw this - terrible really

Shocked I am, absolutely surprised that the government would lie about such things…

next thing they'll be telling us UFOs are real :dts: