Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:47 pm
pointTransient wrote:Woot for overpopulation.
Your world is waiting...
https://www.quake3world.com/forum/
pointTransient wrote:Woot for overpopulation.
Can you imagine how overpopulated America/Europe/Asia will become now? Just increasing the average lifespan will be severe enough. Instead of people dieing in their 60s, if they live 20 more years on average, that's 10s of millions more people walking the street in America alone. Thousands of people die each day from different things, from accidents to gun shootings to heart attacks to whatever. Imagine if 200 people a day are saved. Each year that's 73,000 extra people on the streets. What's that going to do to our food supply? Our polution? Housing?MKJ wrote:pointTransient wrote:Woot for overpopulation.
If given the chance, i'd rather be iced after an accident then brought back to life isntead of dying. FUCK YO COUCH, NIGGA!AmIdYfReAk wrote:that is somthing that shouldent be fucked with.. .
if something/someone dies.. let it be, it was ment to happen..
Transient wrote:Can you imagine how overpopulated America/Europe/Asia will become now? Just increasing the average lifespan will be severe enough. Instead of people dieing in their 60s, if they live 20 more years on average, that's 10s of millions more people walking the street in America alone. Thousands of people die each day from different things, from accidents to gun shootings to heart attacks to whatever. Imagine if 200 people a day are saved. Each year that's 73,000 extra people on the streets. What's that going to do to our food supply? Our polution? Housing?MKJ wrote:pointTransient wrote:Woot for overpopulation.
Granted this is a cynical and pessimistic outlook on what could be a great medical advancement, but the implications aren't all positive.
6 billion people is enough.
Similar advances in technology should allow people to have kids later, which would balance that out.Transient wrote:Can you imagine how overpopulated America/Europe/Asia will become now? Just increasing the average lifespan will be severe enough. Instead of people dieing in their 60s, if they live 20 more years on average, that's 10s of millions more people walking the street in America alone. Thousands of people die each day from different things, from accidents to gun shootings to heart attacks to whatever. Imagine if 200 people a day are saved. Each year that's 73,000 extra people on the streets. What's that going to do to our food supply? Our polution? Housing?MKJ wrote:pointTransient wrote:Woot for overpopulation.
Granted this is a cynical and pessimistic outlook on what could be a great medical advancement, but the implications aren't all positive.
6 billion people is enough.
mik0rs wrote:Which just won't hapen, you're always going to get towny slappers shagging skinny chavs with thin taches and concieving evil little rats for chilren at 13.
Grudge wrote:We just need to keep the poor and uneducated from breeding.
And I quoted my typo.mik0rs wrote:Which just won't hapen.
I'd rather be limited to one child per person. Saying that is essentially saying I don't want to be alive (since my dad was one of eight kids) but I really don't think people should be having so many even without this discovery.Transient wrote:Maybe immediately, but what about the long term effects? Like 50 years down the road?
Plus that means France and the US will be overpopulated, which is still bad.
Sometimes I actually wish I were born in China or Japan. I think it would've been cool.mik0rs wrote:You aught to give China a try.
Only if it were hortonmik0rs wrote:Dunno about Japan, I mean I want to visit and such, but I don't like the idea of trying to put my fingers up the teacher's arse all the time.