Page 3 of 4
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:17 pm
by - Silver -
These pictures are just too damn awesome
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 8:19 am
by +JuggerNaut+
scourge34 wrote:+JuggerNaut+ wrote:[lvlshot][/lvlshot]
The Crab Nebula is one of the most intricately structured and dynamic objects ever observed. The new Hubble image of the Crab was assembled from 24 individual exposures taken with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope's Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (WPFC2) and is the highest resolution image of the entire Crab Nebula ever made.
source
Nice!
a bit late (i am), but thanks
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 4:11 am
by Scourge
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 4:12 am
by Scourge
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 7:24 pm
by Oeloe
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 8:25 pm
by Captain
SPACE
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:08 am
by RRROOOAAARRR
Earth's second Moon is called Cruithne. It was discovered in 1986 and it takes a convoluted horseshoe path around our planet as it is tossed about by the Earth's and the Moon's gravity.
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:58 am
by RRROOOAAARRR
Two killer widescreen wallpapers:
[lvlshot]http://www.adg.us/images/The%20Orion%20Nebula%20(1920x1200).jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.adg.us/images/Center%20of%20the%20Milky%20Way%20Galaxy%20(1920x1200).jpg[/lvlshot]
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 2:49 am
by Scourge
scourge34 wrote:Where the fuck you been?
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 9:06 pm
by chopov
http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/index.html
Lots of breathtaking Hubble images. Most also in original size available (huuuuge!).
This beauty for example also as 175 MB .tif...
[lvlshot]
http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/pu ... o0328a.jpg[/lvlshot]
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:46 am
by +JuggerNaut+
[quote="chopov"][/quote]
awesome, thanks!
not a hubble shot, but fucking awesome none-the-less
Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:06 am
by ForM
Thought you Space Cadets might like this link.
I like Godsmack, and loved this vid.
Experiance and sort it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8in8u_TXypo
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:44 am
by mac
some very nice images there... :icon28:
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:04 am
by Turbine
Code: Select all
;;..
.. ..
iitt ..
ii....
ii
..ii;;.. ii ......;;..
;;iittLLLLttiiii ....;;iiii;;....
;;.. ..;;jjtt ;;ii;;.. ii ..
..ii...... ;;ii ..jjii.... ii....
..;; ....ii..ii ..;;....;;ttiitt..
;;,,...... ..;; ii .... ..;;;;....
.... ......ii ii .... ;;jjffffttii....
..;;...... ;;.. ii ..,,.. ii ..;;iiffLLii
ii ....;;;; ii ttffttii,, ;;;; ii..
;;;;.... ;;.. ttGGffii.. ..;; ..;; ............;;
..;; ......iittiiii;;fftt;;..;;;; ..;; ii.. ..ii..
,,ii...... ii;; iiii..;;ii.. ..,, ii ..;;........ ;;
jjjjiiii;;,,ttjjffjjjj;; ..ii;;.. ;;.. ..;; ;; ....ii..
,,;;;;iiiiffLLttii ,,ttiiiiii....;;.. ii ii ,,;;...... ..;;
..;; ..ii.. ;;;;.. iiii.. ..;; ;;.. ;; ii ........;;..
ii;;...... .... ;;ii ;;.. ;;.. iiii;;.. ..ii
;;iiii.. .. ii;; ;;ii;;;;jj,,;;..;; ........ ;;..
;;LLfftttt .... ..tt;;;; iiiiff;; ;;.. ..;;ii
..ii ..ii...... ..ii iiii ii;;ii;;iiii........ ;;..
..ii ii ii.. ......;; ,,ii ..;;......jjttiiii..........;;
.... ;; ii ii.... .... ii jj........ ..iiiiiiiittiiii;;ii;;
ii;;;;..;;;;..;;.. .... .... ;;.. ii..ff;; ii ....;;iiiiiitt;;
;;;; ..;;;;..;;ii ..;; ..ii.. ii;;tt;; .... ....;;ii
..ii;;iiii;;iiiiiiii ..iiiiii ..;;........,,.. ..ii.... ..;;
ii .. ,,iiffLLttii,, ..;; ..;;.. ;;..tt.. ;;.. ........ ,,..
;;;; .. ;;ttffii;; ii;;;; ..iiiiii ..;; ..;;;;
..tttt;;....;;ii..iiffii;;;;iiiitt.. ..,,;; ii ;;,,.... ;;..
..iitttt,,ii;;iiii;;,,ii ;;.. ..,,.. ii ..;; ...... ..;;
..ii;;..tt;;ii ;; ii....;;..,,.. ii ;; ....;;..
;;ii;;ff....;; ;;tt;;.. ii ..;;...... ..;;
..ii..ttii ;;.. jj.. ..;;ii ii ........ ;;..
,,,,ii iiii;; ....tt;;.. ..;;;;
..;;....ii;; ..tt..ii...... ;;..
..ii.. ...... ..;;
..;; ....;;..
iiii ..;;
..tttt;;.. ;;..
;;iittii.. ..;;
..;;ttffii..
..;;
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:08 am
by Scourge
ascii hubble I guess?
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:15 am
by Turbine
Exactly. No to great but it resembles it enough.
I always wondered how they precisely point the Hubble to a distant object. I know they use a star tracker device, used both by the shuttle and basically any other satellite, that requires precise orienteering and pointing. But these Hubble images are SO far away, combined by the orbital motion and speed of Hubble itself, it makes for some crazy timing mathematics.
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:20 am
by Scourge
That's why they get paid the big bucks. Them fuckers know how to do that scientific stuffs.
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:45 am
by LawL
Hi Randy.
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:54 pm
by DTS
Broken link.
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:55 pm
by Survivor
- Ultron - wrote:Broken link.
This thread is like an old relative, you keep them around even if most ends don't tie up right.
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 11:26 pm
by DTS
Survivor wrote:- Ultron - wrote:Broken link.
This thread is like an old relative, you keep them around even if most ends don't tie up right.
Alright I read some of it and found some working links in it, so it's O.K. now
Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 6:59 pm
by Scourge
tnf wrote:Old?
http://www.shoutwire.com/viewstory/3661 ... ken_Video_
there's a 10 second or so bit with numa numa at the beginning...at first i thought hte whole video was going to be a joke after that, but its not...
talks about the hubble ultra deep field pic being the most important image ever taken by man...
From here:
http://www.quake3world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=26168
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 7:00 pm
by HateFactor
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:chopov wrote:
awesome, thanks!
not a hubble shot, but fucking awesome none-the-less
Photoshop-awesome or long-exposure wizardry??
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 7:53 pm
by DTS
HateFactor wrote:+JuggerNaut+ wrote:chopov wrote:
awesome, thanks!
not a hubble shot, but fucking awesome none-the-less
summermilkywayjg6.jpg
Photoshop-awesome or long-exposure wizardry??
Going by the brightness of the streetlights I'd say it was long exposure. They're glowing.
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:35 pm
by MaCaBr3
Defnately photoshopped.
