Quake3World

YourGrandpa wrote:That's the great thing about this place. If you don't march in lockstep with the majority they'll beat you down hoping you give up. In other words, fuck you and your objective opinions. This place ain't got time for that.

Chin up Ax. Don't let these dicks get you down.

On Q3W it's all fun and games until someone loses a testicle. Literally. There's still some decency left in these people here. More than you give em credit for.

axbaby wrote:Goodbye Quake3World, it's been fun.

Well, we tried. See ya.

axbaby wrote:Goodbye Quake3World, it's been fun.

Go suck on Trump's tiny cheese-covered cock.

axbaby wrote:Goodbye Quake3World, it's been fun.

Trump campaign: 2015-16

Q3W: 1999-????

you need to regain your sense of perspective, dude

Eraser wrote:On Q3W it's all fun and games until someone loses a testicle.

too soon, bro

YourGrandpa wrote:That's the great thing about this place. If you don't march in lockstep with the majority they'll beat you down hoping you give up. In other words, fuck you and your objective opinions. This place ain't got time for that.

Chin up Ax. Don't let these dicks get you down.

lol, spoken exactly like a guy that been gotten to...

axbaby wrote:Goodbye Quake3World, it's been fun.

YourGrandpa wrote: objective opinions.

derp

xer0s wrote:

YourGrandpa wrote:That's the great thing about this place. If you don't march in lockstep with the majority they'll beat you down hoping you give up. In other words, fuck you and your objective opinions. This place ain't got time for that.

Chin up Ax. Don't let these dicks get you down.

lol, spoken exactly like a guy that been gotten to...

people who have been gotten to usually leave and don't come back, like NRAshade and GONNAEATAPLANET

props to Fatpa for not ragequitting like those two faggots

So that dipshit quer0s is still looking for my attention.

I ran into Nightshade last week in a game of Battlefield 4. He asked if people were still posting here.

Nightshade is a weirdo...

lol ax, victim of his own trolls.

YourGrandpa wrote:your objective opinions

I don't think the word objective means what you think it means. God, you're an idiot.

And did ax really leave? That's just sad

so NS, AX and GFY have now left over a storm in a teacup ?. Pansies.

lol, objective opinions. Gramps once again looks like an idiot, trying to church up his vocabulary...

Ryoki wrote:

YourGrandpa wrote:your objective opinions

I don't think the word objective means what you think it means. God, you're an idiot.

And did ax really leave? That's just sad

Since Ax can't vote, don't you think his opinions of American politics are objective? You might be the idiot.

YourGrandpa wrote:In other words, fuck you and your objective opinions. This place ain't got time for that.

I had to go back and look. But basically, Gramps is saying "fuck you and your fact-based opinions"...

Sorry, gonna have to partly side with YourGrandpa on this one. An objective opinion is a thing. In theory at least.
I do think that politics is the last place where you'll find people with objective opinions though.

Sure an objective opinion is a real thing, it's when you have an opinion about an objective. Any other opinion is by definition of being an opinion subjective.

Formally you can speak of an objective opinion in the case of, say, a doctor making a diagnose. When there is no absolute proof of his diagnose being correct, but the doctor making the diagnose based on the facts he knows then you could speak of an objective opinion. There is no (emotional) bias involved in the doctor making the diagnose, yet it's not a definite cold hard fact either.

In normal conversations, people speak of "the doctor's opinion" as well. The doc's opinion in this case is certainly something different than whether or not the color red looks good on you.

Look, i still think you're wrong, the first word excludes fair use of the second i'd say.

Minds far more clever than yours or mine have had this debate before by the way, righteous dudes like Plato and Kant - but alas, i fucking hate philosophy. It's too fuzzy and i don't have nearly enough patience for it. So i capitulate.

Seremtan probably enjoys this kind of scientific philosophy debate though, i've always pegged him as a Kant guy myself

Of course objective opinion is a thing. It's the way Gramps used it. Completely wrong.

Subjective opinion would have worked...

settle down, chimps