Page 241 of 284
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 12:56 pm
by Yeahso
dubz wrote:how depressing, shaft having a cook out by himself... keeping the spirits high after his wife and kids left him for some "piddla"
There's two steaks there, though.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 3:54 pm
by shaft
sick burn dubz. keep that shit in the void though. thx
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 4:12 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 5:55 pm
by plained
lol
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 11:04 pm
by andyman
scope came today, mount came today, assembled everything, scope dovetail does not fit the mount. fail... pissed... must rig something up...
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 11:19 pm
by andyman
solution (?)

Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 12:29 am
by mrd
hahahah wtf is that!?
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 12:45 am
by andyman
my bar stool with the scope strapped to the top of it via ironwoody band #3 (blue), tilted back onto a regular camera tripod to give it some elevation... hey it works though

Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 2:54 am
by Wabbit
Uhhh Andy, do you plan on using it anywhere other than your home?
I don't know why, I got this image of you on the beach with that thing taking pics saying "shut up, shut up, shut up" as people walk by.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 4:22 am
by tnf
This is a sidewalk that normally resides at the bottom of a lake that was created when the Grand Coulee Dam was built, flooding several small towns. The lake is currently dammed off as there is a lot of spring runoff. This town was last above the water somewhere around 1942.

Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 5:36 am
by Whiskey 7
mrd wrote:hahahah wtf is that!?
Got to love desperate improvisation
Nice moon shots Andyman
Nice tricks/composure those of Yeahso, that of 05-12-2011 03:17 PM near magical. Well done

Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 8:21 am
by andyman
Through the new scope... this thing works really well with the camera, and is crazy when looking through the eyepiece. I wish I could get the detail that was in the eyepiece... maybe with a real mount. This setup was, .. tricky
The moon doesn't fit in the frame completely, but I have every part of the surface covered and when i get teh photoshops I'll put them together, that should be mid-week as I'm buying it off someone that bought it with the student discount. score
and this one is my favorite
http://vimeo.com/23847872
So those were with the larger scope, this one is with the one I've been using:
http://vimeo.com/23848627
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 8:48 am
by Don Carlos
Your tripod is fucking epic dude

Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 8:48 am
by Eraser
These look great andy, keep them coming.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 8:47 pm
by Tsakali
I liked your earlier moon pictures better. It feels like there was more detail in them. granted it was probably its position to the light source and the shadows that naturally occur because of it, but these "full moon" images are somewhat flat, and seem blurry in comparison. Not sure if it has something to do with your settings due to the fact that the moon seems brighter now and you lose the detail on the surface or what.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 9:01 pm
by Whiskey 7
Tsakali wrote:I liked your earlier moon pictures better. It feels like there was more detail in them. granted it was probably its position to the light source and the shadows that naturally occur because of it, but these "full moon" images are somewhat flat, and seem blurry in comparison. Not sure if it has something to do with your settings due to the fact that the moon seems brighter now and you lose the detail on the surface or what.
I do see now what you mean here Tsakali as I go back through those shots. The earlier ones have more depth/detail.
Still beautiful work andyman

Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 10:46 pm
by andyman
Tsakali wrote:I liked your earlier moon pictures better. It feels like there was more detail in them. granted it was probably its position to the light source and the shadows that naturally occur because of it, but these "full moon" images are somewhat flat, and seem blurry in comparison. Not sure if it has something to do with your settings due to the fact that the moon seems brighter now and you lose the detail on the surface or what.
It's just because of the light filling in every nook and cranny, you can't really tell any depth. The good thing is that there's still another 2 weeks or so to get all the lovely shadows on the left side of the moon, which I will do. Going to strap the scope to the mount with mini cargo straps
I found it very hard to get the focus right on the full shots too...
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 11:19 pm
by mac
really nice moon shots.. always makes me feel very tiny when i realise what microbes we are in the vast universe..
here is a nice pic (not by me) which fits the theme.. starting space shuttle captured out of a plane
http://twitpic.com/4yg6hs
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 2:51 am
by andyman
There, I fixed it...

Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 5:19 am
by andyman
I have more pictures, but waiting to get photoshop to merge the shots since the moon doesn't fit the frame. Also shot a mosiac with the 2x adapter and will put that together. with any luck it will turn out well.
from tonight though...

Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 5:40 am
by Whiskey 7
Nice andyman, really nice.
Looking forward to developments
(yes looking for a pun

)
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 6:59 pm
by obsidian
I like the overall effect and the desaturated colours, but I find the cow distracting and the tree a little too centred. Might look better if it followed rule of thirds and shifted to the left.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Fri May 20, 2011 12:15 am
by Yeahso
Normally, I take advice on my work, but in this instance I don't think you're right.
There are two lines converging into a point with a main visual device at the tip of the converging lines. If it shifted to the left, there would be a giant gaping space with no visual information. Also, if it shifted to the left, I would lose all of the cloud detail that is balancing that side of the shot.
The rule of thirds doesn't really work when you're photographing what is essentially a triangle. ROT is used to create drama or dynamics in static visual shapes.
I felt the same about the cow, but when I turned the layer off for comparison, the shot just lost something that I couldn't explain. It was boring without it.
That is my most popular Flickr upload ever. It has had 165 comments in three days, and was also accepted on oneeyeland.com, which is probably the most prestigious photography site on the internet. I'm well chuffed.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Fri May 20, 2011 12:17 am
by Yeahso
Finished this in about 25 minutes, I quite like it.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Fri May 20, 2011 12:23 am
by Yeahso
Actually, I just tried it with a left composition, and it does look pretty cool, but the clouds don't quite look right, and it loses the middle-of-nowhere look and just becomes an ordinary mountain.. But it's more balanced than I expected it to be.