Page 258 of 284
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:26 pm
by Plan B
Great shot. Better than this security company could have ever wished for.
I assume the woman is the secured party, she's now also protected against rain.
Highly processed image, but very effective.
EDIT: Hey GH!
Long time no post, thought you were dead.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:15 pm
by Giraffe }{unter
Plan B wrote:
EDIT: Hey GH!
Long time no post, thought you were dead.
Not dead just lurking

Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:53 pm
by seremtan
0psys wrote:This was from a shoot for a security company. Weather was an absolute travesty on the day,

no one has her six
some security company
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:31 pm
by MKJ
how sexist. maybe she's one of the guards

this photographer is so awesome he requires 4 suits on his six.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:51 pm
by Tsakali
This just in! Female guards require their own umbrella carrier, stylish clothing, and hills.
You aint gettin equal pay any time soon.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:55 pm
by Tsakali
Also, I knew I've seen that guy somewhere before
lol I guess that's what you get if you fail your primary mission.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 6:31 pm
by seremtan
MKJ wrote:how sexist. maybe she's one of the guards

one of the guards who needs to have the rain kept off her by one of the other guards? she's clearly the traveller
also, no woman walks in a public place without a purse
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:23 pm
by YourGrandpa
Maybe she's a prisoner.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 9:51 pm
by seremtan
NO ONE ON HER SIX
ffffuuuu-
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:57 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
I like this Jim X fellow's monogrammed umbrella.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 5:31 pm
by tnf
sys0p- you still shooting with a 5D2 as your main full frame body? Or did you switch to Nikon like a few of the photographers I know did when the D800 was released?
I thought they made great improvements with the 5D3 (but it felt more like a 5D Mark 2.5). Still, the autofocus in the 5D2 can make wedding photography sketchy at best sometimes when your subject is moving in less than optimal lighting.
Other than that, I've not seen much in IQ that would have me upgrading my 5D2 to a 5D3. I thought about selling my Mark IV and 5D2 and getting a 1DX - only because I'm a total sucker for new fancy gear, but now that I've got a steadily growing wedding business I need to be a lot more conscious of decisions that make business sense and those that don't.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:16 pm
by 0psys
Still shooting on my 5D2 for the time being, I'm upping to a H4D-40 or 50 at some point in the next 12 months. I'll keep the 5D2 for when medium format isn't convenient.
In all honesty, I very rarely shoot in conditions I can't make perfect with lighting. I don't shoot weddings or events, and prefer to have control of things; I don't think I've taken my camera beyond ISO250 more than twice in the last year.
You're right on the autofocus, though. It's fucking diabolical. Even when I'm in the studio a couple of shots out of 20 will just be completely shit. I shot my friend while he was fighting a couple of weeks ago, and it was just completely useless at capturing fast action. For a wedding, I bet you couldn't go wrong with a 5D3-I remember messing around with a 7D some months ago and the AF was incredibly fast compared to the 5D2.
I dabbled with the idea of switching to Nikon when the D800 was released, but realised that is what I would do if MF wasn't in my future. It's not better, image wise, than even a 5D1, they're all as good as each other in optimal conditions, which is all I want to shoot in.
Yeah, lay off the new equipment unless you absolutely need it. The 1dx won't let you create a new type of picture. Once you get to a certain point in your career, you should only be purchasing equipment that can alter either the look of your shot or increase the efficiency of your workflow. Everything else is just bells and whistles.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:36 am
by andyman
Thought this came out rather well...
some other ones i liked

Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:42 am
by Tsakali
why is the smoke grainy?
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:47 am
by andyman
because it's coffee steam...
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:45 pm
by 0psys
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:47 pm
by Captain
The photos are great, but post-processing makes food look nasty.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:56 pm
by 0psys
I completely agree. Once we shoot in the studio, we'll get the look without compromising on the quality of the food. These were captured while ducking in and around 10 chefs as they prepared the food on the fly. Worst possible environment for food.
That being said, I think the only shot that looks truly bad is probably the eggs. And possibly the shot with the green beans.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:19 pm
by Don Carlos
Anyone that cooks in the Fat Duck is gonna be a bit special.
I also bet shooting while they were cooking was a fucking nightmare. It would have been a food tornado in there
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:09 am
by tnf
Old friend competed for the first time in 16 years and wanted a few studio shots of himself in contest shape at 47 years old.
Here's one -

Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:16 am
by tnf
Heh, I can trace my entire photography 'career' (not that it really is one) through this thread - from first buying a DSLR and having no idea what the hell I was doing and going through the HDR phase a lot of new photographers do to where I am today with a decent small business that lets me stay as busy or not busy as I want with weddings, portraits, and all that crap. Time goes fast. Ironic that another q3w'er went into photography as well - albeit in a much more successful fashion with a lot more natural talent. I wish I had the skills sysop does to move into a full time gig, but if I left my other job that provides health insurance we'd be bankrupt in a few months after dealing with shit like the operation I had last week to remove a gigantic kidney stone. 10 second CAT scan? $3700 before insurance paid for it. 6 hour stay in the ER? About $4000. The operation? $28,000.
Yea, I'd be fucked without insurance...
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 6:25 am
by mrd
tnf wrote:Heh, I can trace my entire photography 'career' (not that it really is one) through this thread - from first buying a DSLR and having no idea what the hell I was doing and going through the HDR phase a lot of new photographers do to where I am today with a decent small business that lets me stay as busy or not busy as I want with weddings, portraits, and all that crap. Time goes fast. Ironic that another q3w'er went into photography as well - albeit in a much more successful fashion with a lot more natural talent. I wish I had the skills sysop does to move into a full time gig, but if I left my other job that provides health insurance we'd be bankrupt in a few months after dealing with shit like the operation I had last week to remove a gigantic kidney stone. 10 second CAT scan? $3700 before insurance paid for it. 6 hour stay in the ER? About $4000. The operation? $28,000.
Yea, I'd be fucked without insurance...
What the hell? That's fuckin' insane.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 2:47 pm
by MKJ
lol healthcare.
Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 2:50 pm
by obsidian
Yeah, fuck those bloody Socialists and their universal health care culture.

Re: PHOTOS PLEASE
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 4:21 pm
by MKJ
even without a job those procedures would be paid for you over here. frolfalicious