no coronavirus thread ?
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
As you say Scourge, "Lots of different ways to look at it" and anyone can make whatever they like out of juggling the numbers, but it is sad all the same :tear: :tear:
Yes, cracked the 5M mark :tear: on reported cases.
15 May 4,539,401
17 May 4,788,005
19 May 4,964,373
21 May 5,090,977
Source #1
Source #2
Yes, cracked the 5M mark :tear: on reported cases.
15 May 4,539,401
17 May 4,788,005
19 May 4,964,373
21 May 5,090,977
Source #1
Source #2
[color=#FFBF00]Physicist [/color][color=#FF4000]of[/color] [color=#0000FF]Q3W[/color]
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
I never said what could or couldn't have been done. :dork:Captain Mazda wrote:You're right, there's nothing the richest nation in the world could've done about its lack of basic human needs like healthcare and having to dig mass graves for corpses like some kind of third-world failed state.
:alert:
What I did say was some are better, some are worse. I'm not getting dragged into a political discussion. Have a nice day. <3
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
"the numbers are what they are" implies this was more or less inevitable. I'm just glad Canada's not listening to its own retarded people and keeping the US border closed.
-
- Posts: 10074
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Why do you even bother engaging this self hating Jihadist anyway. Baldzduh despises western government, culture and it's people so much that it precludes him from having impartial or non-stereotypical conversations. He doesn't even like the country he lives in. But what he hates most is the fact he's become so accustom to the lifestyle of an infidel that he's too big of a pussy to move back to his homeland or blow himself up for Allah. :olo:Scourge wrote:I never said what could or couldn't have been done. :dork:
What I did say was some are better, some are worse. I'm not getting dragged into a political discussion. Have a nice day. <3
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Aren't you supposed to be ignoring me? :olo: My mere existence makes you seethe and dribble up a frothy mixture of saliva and peanutbutter, you lonely, spastic so desperate for attention and respect. I'd tell you to go crash your plastic two-wheeled minivan but it's too slow to overcome the drag from your empty blockhead :olo:
PS. Got you to show this post too :olo:
PS. Got you to show this post too :olo:
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
No, it literally means what it says. It implies neither inevitability nor preventability. Throwing your political bias and personal feelings into it won't change them. Neither would mine.Captain Mazda wrote:"the numbers are what they are" implies this was more or less inevitable. I'm just glad Canada's not listening to its own retarded people and keeping the US border closed.
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
uhhh, this just shows the (entirely predictable) correlation between Covid cases and pop size. it would additional analysis, i.e. clustering or bubble size indicating mortality rate, to be usefulWhiskey 7 wrote:
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Just different ways to look at the climbing numbers :tear:seremtan wrote:uhhh, this just shows the (entirely predictable) correlation between Covid cases and pop size. it would additional analysis, i.e. clustering or bubble size indicating mortality rate, to be useful
Hmm, a bit of a jump in the global reported cases.
15 May 4,539,401
17 May 4,788,005
19 May 4,964,373
21 May 5,090,977
23 May 5,308,059
Source #1
Source #2
BTW, I try and post this every 2 days... ... ..
[color=#FFBF00]Physicist [/color][color=#FF4000]of[/color] [color=#0000FF]Q3W[/color]
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
i wasn't having a go at you, just World in Data. their vizzes are usually on point but this one seems a bit lazy and unfinished
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
I didn't think for a moment you were having a go at me
as I expect near all interpret 'data' differently to some degree.

[color=#FFBF00]Physicist [/color][color=#FF4000]of[/color] [color=#0000FF]Q3W[/color]
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
It's kinda like the circumferences of gwamps' cranium. Any angle you interpret it from, the overwhelming scientific agreement is "gigantic block of shit".
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
I bet Gramps refuses to wear a mask...
- Mat Linnett
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2000 7:00 am
- Location: The Grizzly Grotto
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
It's not that he refuses, per se. It's just that it's simply not possible to make one big enough.
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
wear a grampa undie?
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
He probably thinks it's safer without one. You can hear the rona coming that way.
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Wow, half a mill in 4 days...
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Yeah...Brazil and Russia are posting big numbers
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
And they're definitely inaccurate.
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
US seems to have been stuck on 98k for a while. is orange fuckface suppressing the numbers for the sake of optics? what's the story...?
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
My guess is that it's getting warmer
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
[youtube]r8yOv4PwttM[/youtube]
Re: no coronavirus thread ?
Whiskey's source #1 link is showing over 100,000. And is higher on world totals. Seems that one is a bit behind.seremtan wrote:US seems to have been stuck on 98k for a while. is orange fuckface suppressing the numbers for the sake of optics? what's the story...?