Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 10:49 pm
ppl who r against the death penalty need to be executed!...
Your world is waiting...
https://www.quake3world.com/forum/
You can't use IQ as a variable as there is no set way to measure someone's IQ.riddla wrote:I'd also like to see those graphs correlated with economics and mean IQ.
As is they're pretty weak.
i bet you it's poor undereducated people on death row.riddla wrote:I'd also like to see those graphs correlated with economics and mean IQ.
As is they're pretty weak.
Faulty argument, for the simple reason that I can answer, "I would still not support the death penalty." A friend of mine was kidnapped and killed, and I can honestly say I don't have any desire to see the perpetrator put to death because of it.Underpants? wrote: I've been on the fence for some time about this, then again have never been a victim of violent crime, where that opinion might change. Imagine the person closest to you slaughtered for a few paltry dollars by a person who's never been a functional member of society. You learn after some research that this isn't an isolated event; that prisons are overwhelmed with this type of scum. What if after even further research you learn that some of them are let out after such crimes because of the overpopulation problem, and that indeed your new friend was let go after a 10 year sentence for murder (aka manslaughter), to perpetuate his destiny and, susequently, yours. What would be your thoughts, then?
No one mentions murders committed inside the instittution by this type of person, either?
many questions, dunce100000000, many questions...
That's the reason I dont agree with this execution. There's apparently much circumstantial evidence that was used to convict him, which I dont agree should result in a death sentence.Hannibal wrote:Underswine9 and anybody else....IMO the burden of proof is on the pro-death pentalty peeps...those who want to sanction killing AS punishment. The strongly held moral intuition of "don't be killin'" can't be chuffed away without argument. Obviously this idea is subject to certain ceteris paribus modifications (i.e., self-defense), but it isn't very obvious to me how state sponsored killing qua punishment would fit.
R00k wrote:Again, this isn't just some common homicidal joe - this is the one person who has the ear of a massive number of violent gang members, and who is willing to try to convince them to stop violent activities.
And we're killing the fucking guy? :icon27:
More like rebuffed with a twist of ironic retribution.Hannibal wrote:Lo, I shall be rehabilitated in death.
good idea, let everyone else do the work so you can sit on your lazy hippy ass nit-picking technicalities, not stating reasonable alternatives. Meanwhile, I'll continue to play the devil's advocate just to piss trustafarians like you off.Hannibal wrote:Underswine9 and anybody else....IMO the burden of proof is on the pro-death pentalty peeps...those who want to sanction killing AS punishment. The strongly held moral intuition of "don't be killin'" can't be chuffed away without argument. Obviously this idea is subject to certain ceteris paribus modifications (i.e., self-defense), but it isn't very obvious to me how state sponsored killing qua punishment would fit.
only if efficiency does not relative to fiscal burden on society, then yes, just as efficiently.werldhed wrote:
Faulty argument, .....
removal from society can be accomplished as efficiently by imprisonment...
once again, I wilt in the blinding power of your sharp wit and resourceful argumentsprince1000 wrote:NOT KILLING SOMEONE IS ONE ALTERNATIVE, AND MAYBE THE MOST IMPORTANT.
Apparently reading is not fundamental. My bad. Seriously, did you not understand my point or are you just a fucking retard?Underpants? wrote: good idea, let everyone else do the work so you can sit on your lazy hippy ass nit-picking technicalities, not stating reasonable alternatives. Meanwhile, I'll continue to play the devil's advocate just to piss trustafarians like you off.
certainly not by killing them...duh.riddla wrote:and how do you best get that message across to those who choose to take a life?prince1000 wrote:NOT KILLING SOMEONE IS ONE ALTERNATIVE, AND MAYBE THE MOST IMPORTANT.
A lot of grey area with either stance.
a few million bucks. Get yer facts straight rookie.R00k wrote:In that case, the reason to kill is not to remove one from society, but to save a few bucks.
thank you, finally a rebutal with teeth.HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:if killing is wrong then state sponsored killing sends the wrong message