Page 4 of 5
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:31 pm
by SplishSplash
by proving him wrong? hardly
don't even try, grasshopper
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:25 pm
by Tormentius
SplishSplash wrote:by proving him wrong? hardly
don't even try, grasshopper
Spending an entire page of a thread trying to avoid answering a simple question about your opinion on a fucking superhero movie hardly "proves" anything. :icon27:
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:29 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
don't forget to read Splishy's posts with the voice of a German in your head.
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:54 pm
by SplishSplash
Tormentius wrote:
Spending an entire page of a thread trying to avoid answering a simple question about your opinion on a fucking superhero movie hardly "proves" anything. :icon27:
You do realize that he never answered my question in the first place an then just turned around and said 'You never answered MY question why it's NOT better?'?
And that's exactly what he kept denying and where I proved him wrong.
Just because you're just as retarded as him don't go spouting bullshit.
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 5:09 pm
by Tormentius
He answered your question in plain English right here:
Law wrote:
I'm not sure what constitutes "dumber', but Xmen has superior script, stars, characters, special effects, plot and action.
Note how it clearly states which parts of the movie he thought were better? Is that clear enough for you yet or do you need it spelled out further?
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 5:10 pm
by SplishSplash
SplishSplash wrote:No. See:
Anything in the world consists of different parts.
A chair has legs, a seat, a backrest.
If your saying this chair sucks, and I say why, and you're saying "The backrest sucks, the seat sucks and the legs suck." you didn't say why it sucks. You just recounted the parts of a chair. There is no new information. Therefore you didn't answer my question.
If you wanted to answer my question, you would have said: "The legs are crooked, the seat is covered with splinters and the backrest has a pointy spike that punctures your kidneys when you sit down."
See? New information.
But you know all that. You just don't want to go into details because you know couldn't properly defend yourself.
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:32 pm
by Grudge
ffs Shitsplash, give it up already, he told you in his second post that the x-men movies have superior script, stars, characters, special effects, plot and action
ergo, it's a superior movie
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:42 pm
by Grudge
one shouldn't confuse trolling with stupidity
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:45 pm
by SplishSplash
SplishSplash wrote:I'm still waiting for any explanation as to why F4 is somehow "dumber" than any X-Men movie.
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 7:27 pm
by Captain
HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:don't forget to read Splishy's posts with the voice of a German in your head.
I just watched Downfall so he sounds like Hitler.
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:33 am
by saturn
SplishSplash wrote:Tormentius wrote:
Spending an entire page of a thread trying to avoid answering a simple question about your opinion on a fucking superhero movie hardly "proves" anything. :icon27:
You do realize that he never answered my question in the first place an then just turned around and said 'You never answered MY question why it's NOT better?'?
And that's exactly what he kept denying and where I proved him wrong.
Just because you're just as retarded as him don't go spouting bullshit.
lol, you suck.
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:05 pm
by Doombrain
SplishSplash wrote:Law wrote:SplishSplash wrote:A lot of people hating this movie because it's 'cool'.
Sorry guys, just because Wolverine comes across as all big and heterosexual X-Men is not a better movie.
You're right, out of the numerous reasons as to why XMen is a better movie than Fagtastic Four, Wolverine's masculinity isn't one of them.
F4 was awesome, people should just admit it.
lol, no it was shite
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:33 pm
by LawL
shitsplash
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 12:44 am
by SplishSplash
Law wrote:I'm afraid to back up my opinion that F4 sucks.
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 1:03 am
by LawL
SplishSplash wrote:Everyone in this thread is pointing out to me what a moron I am. :icon23:
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 1:10 am
by SplishSplash
still no answer...
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 1:14 am
by LawL
Still the only retard at Q3W who can't see the answer...
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 1:24 am
by SplishSplash
I'm sorry to see you're obviously not the only retard who thinks saying "It's just better." (or "The following parts are better." or "All parts are better.") is a proper answer to "Why is it better?"
You tried to get out of this dilemma by saying that you can't argue over taste in movies, yet you (your party) started arguing when you said "F4 sucks."
So anywhere you go in this arguement, you will always turn out the loser.
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 1:24 am
by LawL
If you can't figure out the answer after it's been pointed out to you numerous times by numerous people then there's nothing i can do to help you, I don't have magical powers which will suddenly stop you from being completely retarded.
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 1:29 am
by andyman
this thread sucks. unlock mine please
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 1:36 am
by SplishSplash
See, you keep saying that, and I keep pointing out to you that you failed to give a real answer.
Maybe you need a change of perspective to understand:
Since you couldn't come up with any better answer than "It's parts are better.", you tried to turn this argument around and asked me "Why is it NOT better?"
I didn't answer that for a reason that I think must be pretty obvious to anyone: If you think "It's parts are better." is a proper answer, than I could easily answer your question by saying "It's parts are NOT better."
Do you get that?
My answer could have been "Script, stars, characters, special effects, plot and action are inferior."
That wouldn't have been very satisfying, now would it?
And now you know why I asked you for a specific reason why you think X-Men was better. Examples, if you will.
And at the exact moment when you give me that answer, I will be able to answer your question.
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 1:49 am
by LawL
"Failed to give a real answer".
Stop begging for me to point out to you what the rest of the planet can already easily see. Like I said, there's nothing I can do about you being a complete spastic.
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 1:50 am
by Nightshade
Those examples are fairly specific. For shit's sake, are you looking for a doctoral dissertation on one film's superior use of Dutch angles in medium-paced action scenes shot on Wednesdays using no more than 47 extras and employing no less than four cranes?
Goddamn Germans.
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 2:10 am
by SplishSplash
Nightshade wrote:Those examples are fairly specific. For shit's sake, are you looking for a doctoral dissertation on one film's superior use of Dutch angles in medium-paced action scenes shot on Wednesdays using no more than 47 extras and employing no less than four cranes?
Goddamn Germans.
Either you CAN argue about movies, then you CAN say "F4 sucks." but you'd have to back it up.
Or you CAN'T argue about movies because it's all just a matter of taste.
The result is that we all say this or that movie sucks and we all know what happens when people actually discuss a movie's merits: a huge clusteruck.
However, what Law did was insist that "... is superior" is a proper argument in a discussion, and I refuse to let this idiocy stand.
And the more people agree with him because they fail to understand this (including you), the more desperate I get to make this clear, because I am absolutely sure that most of you aren't really that retarded.
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 2:11 am
by ek
desperate to make this clear?