Quake3World

I thought the core was just a lift shaft and not structurally important anyway?

yer i heard that maybe the pic aint reliable but im still right

losCHUNK wrote:that pic looks like its done one over on the core

i suppose it would be like trying to stand with one of our legs broken

and when i used close to, i really mean in to

u can't even see the plane in that pic..its just a big explosion...

so u think that explosion did a number on the core? lol...do u know how hydrocarbons explode? guess not...

Geebs wrote:I thought the core was just a lift shaft and not structurally important anyway?

GWB Aide: "Sir, there's a guy calling himself "freakaloin" on the internet who doesn't even have a job, he says 9/11 was all a fix!"

GWB: "Shit, rumbled"

:lol:

Freakaloin wrote:

losCHUNK wrote:that pic looks like its done one over on the core

i suppose it would be like trying to stand with one of our legs broken

and when i used close to, i really mean in to

u can't even see the plane in that pic..its just a big explosion...

so u think that explosion did a number on the core? lol...do u know how hydrocarbons explode? guess not...

well if you look slightly right you can see another building, its got a hole in it

and after a page of arguing you finally decided to say you cant even see the plane


when you said 'yer the plane looks close to it''

your a tit you know that dont you

the core housed the stairwells...u know...the ones ppl were able to walk down and out the buildings...

oooo so stairs are the solution to holding buildings up ?

shit i feels sorry for bungalows, they must be weak as piss

Freakaloin wrote:yeah right...now they have wireless detonators...i think the govt has the man power and time...

.....and a whole special ops crew of demolition experts with ninja like abilities to work in a public building for around 10 weeks without beeing seen by a single person.

oooooooohhhhhh, and cloaking devices on all the semi trucks that hauled the the 10 tons or so of tnt.

dude, I am so with ya on this one now!

u know its gay anyways...wtc 1 was hit first and the plane smashed up against the core...damaging some of it...but most f it was intact. the second plane did a glancing blow and missed the core and most of the fuel fly out of the building. but wtc2 fell first...

wow ur dumb...they could have been disguised as maintnence workers doing wiring routing or something...at night or whatever...jesus dude...they could get clearance no problem eh?

Maiden wrote:

Freakaloin wrote:yeah right...now they have wireless detonators...i think the govt has the man power and time...

.....and a whole special ops crew of demolition experts with ninja like abilities to work in a public building for around 10 weeks without beeing seen by a single person.

oooooooohhhhhh, and cloaking devices on all the semi trucks that hauled the the 10 tons or so of tnt.

dude, I am so with ya on this one now!

ur very dumb...

losCHUNK wrote:oooo so stairs are the solution to holding buildings up ?

shit i feels sorry for bungalows, they must be weak as piss

GG you loose numbnuts

im off for tea and crumpets

Freakaloin wrote:wow ur dumb...they could have been disguised as maintnence workers doing wiring routing or something...at night or whatever...jesus dude...they could get clearance no problem eh?

uh, no.
without a doubt the buidings had their own staff.
and its pretty safe to say that they have a union to deal with the state run authority that was responsible for the wtc.
you are not going to bring in 20-50 new guys even to clean the crappers without raising a stink with the union.
i guess i can forgive you for not thinking of these things since you are a down home double wide kind of guy and probably have never worked in a building over 5 stories tall.

Everybody now..

The roof,the roof...the roof is on fire...

w00t w00t

god i pwned this thread...

The building in Madrid wasn't made out of steel moron.

This moron has been raving about the WTC for three pages...

It is amusing that he slates another poster for not knowing how the WTC towers were constructed and then goes on to prove by his arguments that he knows absolutely nothing about it himself.
The fact is that the WTC buildings were brought down by a combination of structural damage, fire damage, inadequate fire-proofing of key internal support structures (ie. the trusses supporting each individual floor) and gravity. Wherever you got the idea that the "official" cause of the collapse was simply due to "fire" I do not know.

Luckily those of us actually living in the real world can realise that it is never as simple as that.

(yay quick reply is back!)

I liked that read puff posted. Thank you puff, for educating the masses.

Indeed, I think geoff should perhaps get reading some informed engineers' opinions on the WTC collapses before he inundates these boards with shit he has absorbed from "OMG CONSPIRACY" websites.

Had some good conversations with my dad on this subject in fact, and considering he's a prominent civil engineer in the UK and was in fact one of the first people called to give interviews and statements on the WTC situation, I got some pretty informed views :lol:

Yeah, but Geoof read about it on an internet website favored by crazies.
Owned.

Fuck off Geoff :lol:

PWNED...

http://freepress2005.blogspot.com/2005/ ... world.html

Wasn't it the temperature of the WTF fires that caused the steel to buckle? The jet fuel burnt hotter and more violently then any "typical" fire would... Therefore, a building that is just on fire, like in Madrid, isn't likely to collapse (due to building codes and standard fire protection protocols).

no dumbo, jet fuel burns relative cool...its still a hydrocarbon so it doesn't burn hot enuff to melt steel...