Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by o'dium »

This is... Awful... I never thought I would see the day id Software would make such a mess lol. Ugh...
Mogul
Posts: 1635
Joined: Wed May 23, 1973 12:48 pm

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by Mogul »

Care to elaborate?
This line only remake is total rubbish I've ever seen!!! Fuck off!!! --CZghost
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

fKd wrote:Poor id, they just can't seem to get stuff right anymore...
Eraser wrote:That is a shame. Seems like id can't do anything right these days.
Tim Willits needs to resign. He's a horrible Creative Director.

Throughout my career I've seen Creative Directors resign from jobs that they admit they sucked at. I hope Willits has that same respect for his teammates that others have had and go back to level design...something he's great at.
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by Don Carlos »

o'dium wrote:This is... Awful... I never thought I would see the day id Software would make such a mess lol. Ugh...
Nobody cares what you think anymore. You have spent the last 5 years bitching about almost every game that has come out and had a thread on this forum, whilst always posturing that you are working on something far better.

While I do happen to think you have talent, you have not provided anything other than some screenshots and the odd random video. You have given us nothing tangible to prove you are able to provide the gaming world with something superior. Critique all you want, but don’t give the whole “such a mess lol” comment that clearly insinuates that you could have done better.

Especially when you start being super defensive about people opinions of your own work as you have done here (http://www.moddb.com/games/overdose/videos) only for your coder to come out and undermine everything you have said about it being really early test and it WILL improve. It might improve very slightly, but because someone has expressed their opinion that it doesn’t look as good as they were expecting you have gone ultra defensive, even though the way the physics engine is working is as intended.

When it comes to games and gaming you have seemingly draped yourself in a cloak of self-righteousness solely based on how you perceive yourself and your “work”.

Stop being such a douche bag.
Mogul
Posts: 1635
Joined: Wed May 23, 1973 12:48 pm

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by Mogul »

I agree that Willits would do better in another position. They need somebody that will at least think outside the box a little, if not a lot. I just can't believe they still pull this shit of announcing a new game and coming out in interviews and revealing that it really isn't a step forward from Quake II, design-wise, and was never intended to be. Simultaneously, I also recognize that no creative process has to yield something new and fresh and innovative in order for it to be good, or even great, necessarily. Still, there's no reason they can't branch out and create something more compelling for those of us who have been playing their games for 20 years or so.

That said, I happened to love DOOM 3 and it remains one of my favorite games of all time. I am eagerly awaiting my copy of BFG Edition in the mail. :)
This line only remake is total rubbish I've ever seen!!! Fuck off!!! --CZghost
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19174
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by Eraser »

Don't get me wrong, I loved D3 and the expansion as well. I was also one of the few people that was genuinely impressed by and enjoyed Rage. Having said that though, this BFG edition and the stuff we've seen from Doom 4 doesn't exactly make me feel like id Software is heading in the right direction. And lets not ignore the lackluster Quake 4 and Wolfenstein reboot. Sure, those weren't developed in-house, but they are 2 of id Software's 3 major franchises (not counting Rage and Keen for obvious reasons) and if id Software allows them to slide off like that, then it feels a bit like they stopped caring.
Mogul
Posts: 1635
Joined: Wed May 23, 1973 12:48 pm

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by Mogul »

I also enjoyed Rage, but game system-wise, it under-delivered big time. I remember posting a pretty big list of relatively minor changes that would have added more depth and interest to that game when it was relevant. And really that was scratching the surface. They should have taken the "light RPG elements" they promised way, way further.
This line only remake is total rubbish I've ever seen!!! Fuck off!!! --CZghost
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

They couldn't even get the save system in Rage right.
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by fKd »

GONNAFISTYA wrote:Tim Willits needs to resign. He's a horrible Creative Director.
have to say i fully agree.
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32581
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by MKJ »

Mogul
Posts: 1635
Joined: Wed May 23, 1973 12:48 pm

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by Mogul »

My god, I wish they could get it the fuck together.
This line only remake is total rubbish I've ever seen!!! Fuck off!!! --CZghost
Mogul
Posts: 1635
Joined: Wed May 23, 1973 12:48 pm

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by Mogul »

Just got this in the mail. There are definitely issues with the port. The autosave actually stops the action for about four or five seconds and is very jarring. I consider the original d3 an extremely immersive game, but this just takes a huge chunk out of that immersion.

However, the art and sound design in this game remain second to none, in my opinion. I am still simply blown away at how amazing this game looks. Hats-the-fuck-off to Kenneth Scott.

He's at Microsoft working on Halo 4 now, and I look forward to that game with great interest because of his influence on the art direction. :)

Edit: Also tried some DM. I forgot how much I liked the deathmatch in this game. Of course, the character movement is a bit stiff, so coming from someone that's played more CPM than any other version of Quake out there, that's too bad. That aside, I actually really like how dirty the weapon balance is, and how the game features powerups prominently, even in Tourney mode. I LOVE dm2 where you activate the megahealth's spawn timer. It's not the kind of balanced platform you'd probably want to see money matches played on, but fuck if it isn't interesting to play and watch.
This line only remake is total rubbish I've ever seen!!! Fuck off!!! --CZghost
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19174
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by Eraser »

oh wow, FOV issues, brightness problems (detail loss due to over-saturation), flashlight doesn't cast shadows, config options gone from menus and accessing the console for whatever reason locks you out from all achievements, no mod support (I repeat: no mod support) so in short: it's pretty shit.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digit ... fg-edition
r3t
Posts: 701
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 9:58 am

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by r3t »

Eraser wrote:...and accessing the console for whatever reason locks you out from all achievements
They did that in Rage too, probably to prevent people from using cheats to get achievements, but it's like shooting a fly with a cannon (to use an old saying)
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by o'dium »

Like I said... lol.

The PC "port" of this is terrible... Its a shame really, all they had to do was package up a decent version of sikkmod, and boom, instant impressed kids.

Thing is Carmacks all about his "60fps" thing and I get that, but with the old hardware of consoles... Its just not going to happen.
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19174
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by Eraser »

o'dium wrote:Like I said... lol.

The PC "port" of this is terrible... Its a shame really, all they had to do was package up a decent version of sikkmod, and boom, instant impressed kids.

Thing is Carmacks all about his "60fps" thing and I get that, but with the old hardware of consoles... Its just not going to happen.
Huh? It does run 60fps on consoles. Even Rage runs 60fps on consoles, so what exactly are you on about?
DTS
Posts: 2879
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by DTS »

Oh man, :id: ignorant of thier own audience, this is bad news :miffed:
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

If id Software puts out one more low-quality POS I'll have to start calling them Stellar Stone. :(
morons?
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:58 am

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by morons? »

This release might be good for consoles. On PC it's utter shit. half the console commands don't work anymore (ie g_doublevision) I can't change the refresh rate from shit 60hz, r_displayrefresh has no effect. So the game has screen tears all over the place and hurts my eyes. Game has muddy compressed textures and you can't seem to change that in options.
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32581
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by MKJ »

were you banned again? mustve missed that.

anyways. a game that didnt really needed a rerelease gets a rerelease to ride the 2012 "hd remake"-wave and is worse than the original release on both a technical and customizable level.

great job id, way to push the envelope :up:
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by obsidian »

Good thing I have this:

Image

I remember some of the original Doom mods are pretty extensive, adding better mouse support, updated textures and lighting system.
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32581
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by MKJ »

indeed, I have the same.
and the original UDoom in huge cartboard box, too.

come to think of it, I own about 6 different copies of the game, not including d2. ffuu--
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19174
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by Eraser »

Memphis wrote:Not all is lost - apparently flashlight shadows and fov options make a return in the next patch, which is all I really lamented losing tbh. Those moaning at a loss of other settings, when everything's now outdated and maxed by default, are idiots.

I'm half fancying slogging through the dooms with a pad and some rumble. But then they pull the dick move of removing all the originals from steam, blatantly trying to juke the sales of this one. /Facepalm
What about the loss of mod support?
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by obsidian »

That's a big one, with the engine GPL'ed there are some interesting mods out there (The Dark Mod for instance).
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32581
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Doom 3 'BFG Edition'

Post by MKJ »

jesus christ
http://kotaku.com/5954717/doom-3-disapp ... shady-move
Post Reply