Page 4 of 5

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:51 am
by YourGrandpa
No shit what-so-eva.

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 5:07 am
by LawL
Exactly.

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:06 am
by scared?
fuck u...

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:13 am
by LawL
You're too old to get an erection.

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 7:01 am
by scared?
Image

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 7:05 am
by EtUL
The kept misspelling "negligently" in that article.

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 7:09 am
by LawL
They

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:20 am
by seremtan
HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:
**quote**
http://www.thestar.com/news/world/artic ... cidentally
meanwhile in other news: due to current trends in public debate, events which were confined to local coverage in the past now get national coverage, thereby seeming more significant than they really are

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 1:05 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
No, the news that you're a ginger kiddy fiddler is significant.

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:17 pm
by Plan B
Not really.
Shoot him a PM if you've got a personal problem.
But fuck off out of threads you don't contribute to.

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:24 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
I've sent you a pm.

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:46 pm
by seremtan
HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:No, the news that you're a ginger kiddy fiddler is significant.
that's cute brian, and clearly i've rustled your jimmies, but did you actually read the link you posted?
Five people were wounded when firearms accidentally went off at gun shows across the United States on Saturday.
i.e. out of the no doubt hundreds (or possibly thousands) of gun shows going on that day in America, a grand total of five people were injured out of the god knows how many people attended "across the United States". the guy who wrote that piece literally had to dredge through a metric fuckton of local news networks and new sites to pull it together

or do you only object to journalistic retardation and spin when it's the other side doing it?

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:59 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
I found it funny not significant. I didn't realize that disqualified it from being posted here.

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 5:31 pm
by YourGrandpa
That is now a lead story on the Huffington Post front page.

Imagine that.

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:28 pm
by GONNAFISTYA
The Huffington Post is the exact type of news aggregate site that would put together all of those gun-related accidents that, thankfully, didn't get anyone killed. Where else would you expect to find these collections, Fox News?

And I agree that reporting the events is more of a punchline than anything else, but I think it's useful to remember that a gun-saturated culture has more gun violence than just monthly mow-downs from nutbags unloading automatics in a crowded place. The NRA has won for so long because they're banking on people not having the energy to shout them down. I realize the lefty types are generally lazy and therefore have allowed the nutters to control the conversation, but enough with the bullshit already because the smart move is to keep up the public pressure and point it out the insanity every chance you get.

Quit whining that someone is merely pointing out that stupid shit is happening daily in the supposed "safest places on Earth"...."gun-full" zones. Next you ADHD morons will getting annoyed and saying "old" whenever more news of Sandy Hook comes out. :dork:

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:32 pm
by YourGrandpa
Tell us how you really feel.

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:34 pm
by GONNAFISTYA
I'm simply a guy suffering from a hangover telling a dumb yank that his country is fucked and will stay fucked if the problem keeps getting ignored. This is comedy to me.

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:35 pm
by losCHUNK
YourGrandpa wrote:Tell us how you really feel.
I'll bet that's what your son asks before you go on your all American rampage

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:41 pm
by YourGrandpa
GONNAFISTYA wrote:I'm simply a guy suffering from a hangover telling a dumb yank that his country is fucked and will stay fucked if the problem keeps getting ignored. This is comedy to me.
I think we should do something. But not your something. The real comedy is watching you get so worked up over something you can't control.

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:43 pm
by GONNAFISTYA
Image

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:45 pm
by YourGrandpa
You're easily reduced lately. Quite amusing indeed. :olo:

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:53 am
by LawL
Ryoki wrote:
YourGrandpa wrote:1. I don't think banning assault rifles is a fix. There are a great deal of statistics that have shown that simply banning them didn't work.
Could you kindly provide any of those statistics? If so, could you explain why it did work in other counties that have banned assault rifles (such as Australia)?
Anyone know why Gramps kept replying in this thread but couldn't answer Ryoki's post?

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:20 am
by YourGrandpa
LawL wrote:Anyone know why Gramps kept replying in this thread but couldn't answer Ryoki's post?
Why don't you Google gun deaths in the US where there are strict gun laws?

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:22 am
by LawL
Sure. Why don't you answer Ryoki?

Re: Progression of gun laws in the US.

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:27 am
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
LawL wrote: Anyone know why Gramps kept replying in this thread but couldn't answer Ryoki's post?
Because he's mostly mong?