Quake3World

Κracus wrote:Right bla bla bla intent...

The intent was for the bike to be stolen.

The intent in cutting the brakes.

The intent of putting it on a slope

the intent of tying a rope to it.

But hey, bla bla bla right? Durr hurr lookit da bike teif eat dirt ha! Yeah that's what you sound like to me.

Bla bla bla trap actually...

He didn't intend for someone to steal it, so the condition of the bike and the intentions involved with that have nothing to do with it. You can't determine the actions that the individual was undertaking (he could've been going to the police stations lost property box)

He intended for someone to take it, that's it, at their own risk considering its condition. But even then that is loose in the eyes of the law because you can't determine the acts of an individual, hence why baiting isn't a crime but entrapment is... Infact I don't think baiting is even a legal term in a civil case, because you can't intend for someone to take something belonging to you, as this is a decision outside of your control. The only way this would be reasonable is if there was a sign that said 'free bike'.

Beyond that we need to consider if it was a trap or not, which, as we established it is not.

I'd like some of what chunk is smoking though. Must be some pretty good shit.

so when 1 idiot meets another idiot -we get this! (videos)
Great fun and popcorn-discussion... Go on internet, i love you soo much!

Blame it on the trees in this one?

[youtube]fxK2whfS-Rw[/youtube]

Shall we move onto the definition of a trap now ?

Because ya know, I always walk into traps that have clear warnings

This scenario was clearly set up to humiliate and or injur unassuming criminally minded individuals. But in order to establish blame you have to prove intent or negligence on their part. Intent would mean they somehow knew the theif was a theif and was going to steal the bike. To prove negligence you'd have to make similar assumptions.

In the end, the situation took care of itself. Arguing for the theif is pointless.

theif

I before E unless after... err, Alzheimers

That's odd. Wonder why my phone auto selected that. Swipe isn't always right. Anyway, glad I could find some common ground for you dipshits.

Carry on, if you can.

Hmm that's weird

Autocorrect excuse.

^ Upset about it

YGP has to get the last word in.

Κracus wrote:I actually have been in that situation lars, a few times in fact. The guy that stole my Kona Cinderkone got a little roughed up but it wasn't because he stole my bike, he just wouldn't tell me who he sold it to when I found him. At this point I had him in my car so I jammed the brakes on and smashed his face into the dashboard... Got my bike back though. So you're somewhat correct that yeah, I felt like that but I had the opportunity to do much worse to the guy and I didn't.

Oh fucking LOL, this is what I was hoping this thread would produce

Transient wrote:YGP has to get the last word in.

^ Can't move on.

Can't stop mentioning the sig.

^Still upset and showing it.

It would take more effort to remove it, I just can't be bothered. You, on the other hand, can't stop mentioning my sig and trying to get a rise out of me. I've never been more amused. I'm not one for trolling people at Q3W, but somehow I seem to have accidentally done just that.

^Dummy being tolled with his troll.

END OF TEST

Transient wrote:MOVING ON

f