Quake3World

Dr_Watson wrote:

Grudge wrote:Italy did not deserve the gold.

and the headbutting diving french did?
hell, the only trophy I'd give them is one of these:

every team had a Greg LouGayness among them.

owned

You know, i didn't even watch the final.

i got bored with it, and stopped watching about 3 minutes before the red

Ezekiel wrote:

losCHUNK wrote:crouch is absolutely useless on his tod

although he is pretty useless anyway, lampost with boots !

It took years to get rid of Heskey. They then replaced him with an even bigger donkey. Defoe? No. Bent? No. Beattie? No. A human pipe-cleaner? Yes!

Even Malcolm Christie or Alan Smith with his leg in plaster would have been better.

Anyway, look on the bright side - the nation is about to feel the same Frustration that Middlesbrough fans have had to endure for seasons. If you thought Svens squad selection is dodgy just wait until you see McLaren and his tactics...

... Fans didn't throw their season tickets at him for nothing.

i dont understand why people rail on crouch all the time. i think he's a creative player with his passing (relative to the other english players). and he's a huge target in the air.

the midfield was a huge problem for england. the only thing england could really do well was stuff off the dead ball. why take out the one guy (aside from terry) that can really capitalize on them?

anyway, the english team should have been built around gerrard. the midfield was the real problem. i think people were so focused on the front line having problems that they ignored the midfield (for the most part).

the ball was too round for the english style of play