Quake3World

Tsakali wrote:Watch trump come out after only to reveal he is a democrat, and basically used the Republican parties own idiotic principles and voterbase to destroy it from within. But unfortunately he is not that smart.

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:

plained wrote: no anti hil posts.

that says it all

except for the anti-hillary post i made...

tell ya what plained, you make a hillary thread and I'll post about hillary in there. You'll love it because i despise her about as much as I do Donald Trump.

This is really a binary thing for you? If I don't support one (Trump) I must support the other (Hillary)?

coltonquake3 wrote: Already made one. It's the President Clinton thread if you were looking.

plained wrote:by useing great great great.

no disgusting vulgarity yup so telling

just more verification and proof on intent

CHRIS CUOMO (HOST): Break into Donald Trump's statement right now which is not something we often do but it's very remarkable at this point because of what he hasn't mentioned yet. Donald Trump has been up at the podium for about five minutes, has not mentioned Brexit, is only talking about his golf course and his other business ventures and how it came to be. Let's discuss why he would make this choice and what the implications are.

[...]

JOHN AVALON: This is insane. The presumptive Republican nominee has the world watching on a historic day and he is doing a five minute advertorial for his golf course in great detail, talking about the beauty of the suites, how great the pars are on certain holes, not talking about Brexit. This is a summation in some ways of his campaign. He is in the right place at the right time for his message, and he blows it because at the end of the day, it's all about him. He seems to be trying to profit off a presidential run and not taking it seriously. This is trump steaks all over again after winning the primaries. It's completely insane.

ALISYN CAMEROTA (HOST): David, is that how you see it?

DAVID GREGORY: I think John understates the importance of adding suites to the lighthouse. But I totally -- I mean, look, we spent all this time analyzing the potential significance of the parallels with his own campaign. We spent all of this time highlighting parallels of the campaign and way out ahead of where Donald Trump's campaign is. I'm shocked that, even given his statements, that he didn't come out and immediately seize on the importance of this. Maybe he wanted to inject a note of caution by not getting involved. But no, this just seems like political malpractice. I'm as bemused as everyone else looking at this thinking how strange this is.

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:

plained wrote:by useing great great great.

no disgusting vulgarity yup so telling

just more verification and proof on intent

your posts are telling. they're telling me you're a butt-hurt retard.

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote: I have been consistently anti-war in my postings the 16-17 years that I have been posting here.

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:So let me be clear. I agree with plained that a vote for either Trump or Hillary is a vote for war and no one should do it. Oh wait, plained might think that Trump wouldn't continue or start wars. I think he's dead wrong about that.

Synergy wrote:

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:So let me be clear. I agree with plained that a vote for either Trump or Hillary is a vote for war and no one should do it. Oh wait, plained might think that Trump wouldn't continue or start wars. I think he's dead wrong about that.

If anything Trump wants to scale down America's presence in other countries and focus on defense at home. This is to save on the budget significantly so the government can spend it on more purposeful things like business deals and tax cuts.

Synergy wrote:

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote: I have been consistently anti-war in my postings the 16-17 years that I have been posting here.

Want a cookie?

Can honestly say I've never met someone who is PRO war....