Page 1 of 1
Just ran Doom 3 demo in ultra mode
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 5:29 am
by Underpants?
ran fairly goddam smooth too with only 256 MB onboard.
*kisses
X700.
*humps keyboard.
Re: Just ran Doom 3 demo in ultra mode
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 5:31 am
by Oblivi0.on
Underpants? wrote:ran fairly goddam smooth too with only 256 MB onboard.
*kisses
X700.
*humps keyboard.
ram or video mem? (256)
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 5:37 am
by Underpants?
video mem... gig of system (the slower 400mhz shit) ram

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 5:38 am
by Oblivi0.on
erm...so, back to what i was going to post initially...
"only 256"
rofl..what do you mean only? thats all you CAN get...and thats a fucking lot.
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 5:41 am
by Underpants?
yeah man

i'm just sayin, what was about all this talk regarding 500 megabytes of texture memory
good times good times.
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 5:42 am
by Oblivi0.on
512mb would be pretty inssane...and rather pointless really....
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 5:08 pm
by Tormentius
Did ya run a timedemo Underpants? What were the results?
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:04 pm
by Underpants?
just a hair over 30 with 1,024x768 (4X aa and 8X as or whatever acronym it boils down to)
edit: no one took the hook. :icon33:
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:23 pm
by rep
You know how Quake looks shitty, but when it came out we were amazed with it?
I wonder how long it'll take for DOOM 3 to look bad.
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:44 pm
by Underpants?
Great game overall. Just didn't know if I was fond or not of the way everything looked like an action figure halfway through an intensive microwave session, personally. I was honestly plenty impressed, oh please believe. The theme plot and atmosphere were fair to middlin', as well. I guess I had a rough time with that waxy shine cast across everything after a couple of hours.
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 1:00 am
by Tormentius
Underpants? wrote:just a hair over 30 with 1,024x768 (4X aa and 8X as or whatever acronym it boils down to)
edit: no one took the hook. :icon33:
Nice numbers with that much detail. What CPU?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:42 am
by Underpants?
3.0 520 915G chipset. not the top of the line, but, meh I didn't spend much either.
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:21 am
by Tormentius
Underpants? wrote:3.0 520 915G chipset. not the top of the line, but, meh I didn't spend much either.
Not the newest but I've been hearing good things about the 915 chipset.