Page 1 of 1

Drug trial goes pear-shaped, 6 men throw terminal whitey

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 1:28 pm
by 4days
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4808614.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/engl ... 807042.stm
and
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/engl ... 808836.stm

"Two men are critically ill in the intensive care unit of Northwick Park hospital, and another four are seriously ill after taking an anti-inflammatory drug as part of a drug trial."

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 3:00 pm
by Absolut
And they are supprised they are ill and may die from the experiment?

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 3:48 pm
by Foo
Um, yes. Thousands of these clinical trials happen annually, and the safety checks before any of these drugs reaches any form of human consumption is extreme.

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:31 pm
by Transient
It's a trial for a reason, Foo. To weed out the things they don't catch with initial checks.

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:42 pm
by 4days
they interviewed the girlfriend of one of the potential pre-corpses on the radio (where the copy for the most recent story has come from).
was disturbing listening, made you feel sorry for the poor bloke.

there he is, expecting a headache and a touch of soupy flatulence as a quick fix to his debt problems, when all of his organs stop working and he swells up like the elephant man. that's got to suck.

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:42 pm
by Foo
Transient wrote:It's a trial for a reason, Foo. To weed out the things they don't catch with initial checks.
Yeah totally, but it is big news when something goes this badly wrong because it's extremely rare.

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:44 pm
by losCHUNK
its like buying a car from a gypsy and wondering why the wheels fell off

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:50 pm
by Jackal
The drugs are still tested for safety, as Foo already stated. So it isn't exactly like "buying a car from a gypsy and wondering why the wheels fell off".

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:56 pm
by losCHUNK
i bet that car was tested by a certified gypsy who used to work for the AA

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:11 pm
by Fender
I'm still baffled by the thread title. :confused:
Looks like something plained would write to me.
:pear:
:whitey:
ey?

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:15 pm
by Don Carlos
Fender wrote:I'm still baffled by the thread title. :confused:
Looks like something plained would write to me.
:pear:
:whitey:
ey?
British speak man...

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:38 pm
by feedback
Fender wrote:I'm still baffled by the thread title. :confused:
Looks like something plained would write to me.
:pear:
:whitey:
ey?
*lol*

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:37 pm
by mjrpes
Foo wrote:Um, yes. Thousands of these clinical trials happen annually, and the safety checks before any of these drugs reaches any form of human consumption is extreme.
You are certainly right that a good amound of testing is done before a drug is given to humans, seeing as this fiasco is exactly what a firm wants to avoid. But these firms are not doing a good public relations job at the moment and are sending mix messages to the families of the victims.

Did the drug kill a dog or not?

They should explain clearly and immediately the testing that was done that gave researchers good confidence this drug would be OK for humans.

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:38 pm
by phantasmagoria
Holy fuck, my housemates have been trialing anti-inflamitary drugs :icon28:

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:41 pm
by bitWISE
Don Carlos wrote:
Fender wrote:I'm still baffled by the thread title. :confused:
Looks like something plained would write to me.
:pear:
:whitey:
ey?
British speak man...
Care to elaborate?

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:59 pm
by Don Carlos
Drug trial goes pear-shaped, 6 men throw terminal whitey = Drug trail goes horribly wrong, 6 men are at deaths door.