Quake3World

Posted: **Sat Jul 15, 2006 8:03 pm**

Well I have been using Sony MDR-EX71s for a long time, bene through three pairs (due to NewEggs willingness to replace them, but now the warrenty is out). The main problem is the plastic covering around the wires seems to fall away, I believe Sony just slides the wires into the plastic without shrink wrapping or anything. I am looking for something similar, an in-ear headphone, great sonud quality, the earbud style. The other thing I don't like about the MDR-EX71s is that the cord is something like 4.75 feet long which gets rather annoying. I don't want to spend over $50 really, the main thing is good sound quality. I know Apple has some in-ear headphones and the problem with those is that they are white, first of which I don't much like white as it can get dirty and second I don't want to be advertising that I have an iPod. What would you recommend?

Posted: **Sat Jul 15, 2006 8:10 pm**

The apple phones aren't great.

If you want quality, consider the Shure E2c or above. Just dont get the faggy gamer versions.

Posted: **Sat Jul 15, 2006 8:17 pm**

Well they do look nice, in one of the reviews on newegg a guy said they were a replacement for his Sonys that the rubber had fallen off. The problems being $100 is very expensive and I'm not sure noise cancelling is a good thing as if I am listening to them around people then somebody might need to get my attention and they might hender that, also the codr length is 5 feet, the main problem though being the price.

Posted: **Sat Jul 15, 2006 8:42 pm**

Well a store on Amazon, Shoreline Music, sells them for $73 shipped, better price there. Still not too sure.

Posted: **Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:04 pm**

Ugh, Sony headphones...

I'd go for Bose. They never failed me until I got into a fight with a Paki and he broke them

Posted: **Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:07 pm**

Bose are a complete joke IMO. Overpriced units with underspecced components.

Posted: **Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:41 pm**

Captain Mazda wrote:Ugh, Sony headphones...

I'd go for Bose. They never failed me until I got into a fight with a Paki and he broke them

lol Bose.

KOS - go to headfi.org and take a look around.

Posted: **Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:43 pm**

Which also reminds me that KOSS are a pretty good brand if you can find a suitable set in their narror product range.

Posted: **Mon Jul 17, 2006 2:18 pm**

Foo wrote:Which also reminds me that KOSS are a pretty good brand if you can find a suitable set in their narror product range.

tr00sp33k. two in a row, you're on a roll.

Posted: **Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:41 pm**

Foo wrote:Bose are a complete joke IMO. Overpriced units with underspecced components.

Hmm, I bought mine for $24.99 CDN and IMHO had perfect sound quality, exceptional comfort, great flexibility, and a nice little volume thingy

Posted: **Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:12 pm**

Captain Mazda wrote:
Foo wrote:Bose are a complete joke IMO. Overpriced units with underspecced components.
Hmm, I bought mine for $24.99 CDN and IMHO had perfect sound quality, exceptional comfort, great flexibility, and a nice little volume thingy

junk.

Posted: **Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:15 pm**

no u

Posted: **Thu Jul 20, 2006 6:00 am**

KOS, theres one site to go to for iPod realted shit, and that would be http://www.ilounge.com. Reviews for more crap then you'd ever imagine. I've personally got a pair of Griffin Earthumps, black or white for $20. While they are a little more bassy than the source, they' sound great, have a nice build quality, and the bassyness can probably be fixed by covering up the weird porthole things on the sides, from personal experience (a small piece of scotch tape cuts the overbassyness almost in half) and they got a B- from iLounge.

Posted: **Sat Jul 29, 2006 6:06 am**

Well the MDR-EX71s have formed a condition which makes it feel like steel wool on my neck so I think I will purchase some a new pair tomorrow. What exactly are the pros and cons of the Shure E2cs.

Posted: **Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:44 am**

con: they're expensive, and intended for high detail not high volume.
pro: some of the best sound quality available.

Posted: **Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:36 pm**

What do you mean not high volume, I mean I can understand headphones not being all that loud, but do you mean that with the iPod on full volume it would be quiet or just that other headphones prolly go louder?

Posted: **Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:59 pm**

Kills On Site wrote:What do you mean not high volume, I mean I can understand headphones not being all that loud, but do you mean that with the iPod on full volume it would be quiet or just that other headphones prolly go louder?

The test pair I tried a few months back didn't go as high as a full headset I tried in the same session. Both were pretty loud. But that could have been down to the kit that was powering them. They were both coming off different systems.

Posted: **Sat Jul 29, 2006 5:29 pm**

This is a good quote from the iLounge review:

Being very sensitive, and being stuck well into your ears, they need very little iPod amplifier power - about halfway across the iPod volume graph for normal listening

Hopefully that is the case, I would think being so sound isolating that it would need less volume anyway.

Posted: **Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:58 pm**

I got the Shure E2cs today, happy they got here before the weekend. These things are some awesome headphones. They really do bring out sounds and tones that went unnoticed before. They are by far the best sounding things ever, not only is the clarity and definition better then the EX71s but they have no distortion when louder. Also, they are not quiet at all. The clarity is very noticable on anything orchestral and the Ace of Spades, which was previously very confusing with the EX71s.

Posted: **Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:10 pm**

It's good to know that. I can put it down as just a one time thing.

Quake3World

New Headphones

New Headphones