Page 1 of 2

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 6:30 am
by ToxicBug
Fascinating.

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:05 am
by seremtan
all they've really decided is when to use a word, and use it consistently. our solar system isn't going to change size

i call topic misrepresentation

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:52 am
by MKJ
indeed seremtan.
our solar system has been growing and shrinking for over 2 decades now.

i still say Pluto is not a planet, for several astronomical reasons i will not go in to now :D

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:10 am
by Eraser
Pluto is a dog

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:13 am
by MKJ
and a god :eek:

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 11:49 am
by Transient
Bad idea, IMO. :icon13:

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:08 pm
by Turbine
I only see 11 planets on that picture.
Where is the 12th planet?

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:10 pm
by Ryoki
2003 UB313? What, they ran out of good names?

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:14 pm
by MKJ
Turbine wrote:I only see 11 planets on that picture.
Where is the 12th planet?
pluto and charon, tool

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:18 pm
by Ryoki
I'm telling you this naming thing is an issue. In the future there'll be major accidents that go like this:

"You fool! I said lay in a course for 2015 B234, not 2050 B234! That's a gas giant, we'll be cosmic dust in 10 seconds flat!"
"Oh shit captain!"

Not good.

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:20 pm
by MKJ
you want to pay attention to your msn, guyblowki

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:28 pm
by Ryoki
MKJ wrote:you want to pay attention to your msn, guyblowki
I´m on a different PC today... i´ll install it on this one :E

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:44 pm
by Freakaloin
old...

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 3:55 pm
by seremtan
Ryoki wrote:2003 UB313? What, they ran out of good names?
they should call it planet kebab

for no particular reason

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:31 pm
by Canis
HAHAHA!!!

We have all these mythological names for our planets, that have meaning in literature and history....and then we go an name the last one "2003 UB313"

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:44 pm
by Nightshade
MKJ wrote:indeed seremtan.
our solar system has been growing and shrinking for over 2 decades now.

i still say Pluto is not a planet, for several astronomical reasons i will not go in to now :D
Uh, it's a captured Kuiper Belt object, what's so complicated about that?

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:48 pm
by Nightshade
"It's a planet if it's not orbiting a planet."
Umm...

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 6:00 pm
by Nightshade
Sure, just pointing out the goofiness of the second bit.

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:02 pm
by Tsakali_
seremtan wrote:
Ryoki wrote:2003 UB313? What, they ran out of good names?
they should call it planet kebab

for no particular reason
they should call it Urectum!

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:06 pm
by bitWISE
2003 UB313 isn't the public name ffs...all objects found in space are given similar official names and later given a friendly name like Pluto or Andromeda.

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:10 pm
by plained
its goen be name'ed after the me

planet plained :drool:

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:22 pm
by MKJ
Nightshade wrote:
MKJ wrote:indeed seremtan.
our solar system has been growing and shrinking for over 2 decades now.

i still say Pluto is not a planet, for several astronomical reasons i will not go in to now :D
Uh, it's a captured Kuiper Belt object, what's so complicated about that?
ding, one of the reasons

nothing complicated about it, i just didnt feel like putting all them reasons into words at that point in time

the other reason is - ofcourse - its orbit thats skewed in comparison with the other planets, and the fact that its a solid body opposed to the gaseous bodies at the outer edges of the solar system (which in turn has to do with the sun;s gravitational pull).

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:48 pm
by losCHUNK
doesnt it have to be a certain size aswell ?

i heard an arguement a while back about the addition of a new planet but because it was smaller than pluto they bunked the idea (because by all accounts pluto is supposed to be too small to be a planet ?) ?

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:50 pm
by Nightshade
MKJ wrote:
Nightshade wrote:
MKJ wrote:indeed seremtan.
our solar system has been growing and shrinking for over 2 decades now.

i still say Pluto is not a planet, for several astronomical reasons i will not go in to now :D
Uh, it's a captured Kuiper Belt object, what's so complicated about that?
ding, one of the reasons

nothing complicated about it, i just didnt feel like putting all them reasons into words at that point in time

the other reason is - ofcourse - its orbit thats skewed in comparison with the other planets, and the fact that its a solid body opposed to the gaseous bodies at the outer edges of the solar system (which in turn has to do with the sun;s gravitational pull).


Ehhh, not quite accurate on your last bit there. Yes, Pluto's different than the rest of the Jovian planets, but they evolved the way they did due to the mechanism of the formation of the entire solar system, not just the sun's gravity. All the heavier elements that are charateristic in the terrestrial planets were held in closer in the nebula from which our solar system evolved, leading to the gaseous composition of the Jovian planets we see today.

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:28 pm
by MKJ
thats what i meant; i kinda dumbed it down so to speak