Page 1 of 1

Will someone unlock my picture thread...

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 3:13 pm
by Kn0wFuRy
...because raw said to stop quote spamming and I only got to post one picture.

You people know me: that wasn't enough. 0_o

And I am not spamming to make another pic thread.

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 3:14 pm
by Doombrain
ask raw.

Re: Will someone unlock my picture thread...

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 3:15 pm
by Testoclesius
Kn0wFuRy wrote:...because raw said to stop quote spamming and I only got to post one picture.

You people know me: that wasn't enough. 0_o

And I am not spamming to make another pic thread.
stop spamming bitch :lol:

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 3:19 pm
by Kn0wFuRy
Doombrain wrote:ask raw.
I am gonna, Doomy. Sup with you?

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 3:20 pm
by Doombrain
Kn0wFuRy wrote:
Doombrain wrote:ask raw.
I am gonna, Doomy. Sup with you?
fuck all. he locked it, i'm not going to open it because he locked it for a reason.

it's nothing personal

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 3:32 pm
by Kn0wFuRy
Doombrain wrote:
Kn0wFuRy wrote:
Doombrain wrote:ask raw.
I am gonna, Doomy. Sup with you?
fuck all. he locked it, i'm not going to open it because he locked it for a reason.

it's nothing personal
I didn't take it personal. It wasn't for anything I did. He unlocked it. : )

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 5:35 pm
by SplishSplash
What's the pleasure in posting the same grainy, blurry, low-res pictures over and over again?

Re: Will someone unlock my picture thread...

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 5:39 pm
by shaft
Kn0wFuRy wrote:...because raw said to stop quote spamming and I only got to post one picture.

You people know me: that wasn't enough. 0_o

And I am not spamming to make another pic thread.
we have seen more then enough.

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 6:01 pm
by Geebs
We certainly have

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 6:32 pm
by Oblivi0.on
middle-aged sag boxes. yea, thats JUST what we need.

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 6:41 pm
by LOL INTERNET
lkj

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 9:48 pm
by rep
Please unlock her thread. I need new CW material for my collection. I've seen the girls who play Quake 3, and I can honestly say that she's the prettiest by a longshot. :dork:

It's the truth. :lub:

Edit: Plus she's not one of these sponsored fakers. She knows the ins and out of the Quake community.

Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:19 pm
by bork[e]
rep wrote:Please unlock her thread. I need new CW material for my collection. I've seen the girls who play Quake 3, and I can honestly say that she's the prettiest by a longshot. :dork:

It's the truth. :lub:

Edit: Plus she's not one of these sponsored fakers. She knows the ins and out of the Quake community.
For a girl you like so much you sure do know very little about er. ..idiot :icon29:

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:26 am
by Kn0wFuRy
SplishSplash wrote:What's the pleasure in posting the same grainy, blurry, low-res pictures over and over again?
It amuses me. That is all the pleasure I need to have to do something. : )

And as far as everyone seeing enough.....good!!

Then just don't read my pic threads...."pic" is almost always in the subject line.

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:29 am
by Kn0wFuRy
rep wrote:Please unlock her thread. I need new CW material for my collection. I've seen the girls who play Quake 3, and I can honestly say that she's the prettiest by a longshot. :dork:

It's the truth. :lub:

Edit: Plus she's not one of these sponsored fakers. She knows the ins and out of the Quake community.
I am not sure what to think of what you say but I will give you the benefit of a doubt and say thank you.

I cannot play Quake because I am motion sick.

Towering is as much as I have successfully done despite getting advise even from id on motion sickness and gaming.

I am not sponsored or a faker and yes, I have posted with Quakers since 2000 as well as having other friends in the gaming industry, so I know a couple of things. :)

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:53 am
by rep
Can you play at timescales below 1? Load up a single player game and try running it with the command /timescale .75 and see if it's any better for you. Also try changing your FOV to something lower than 90, like /cg_fov 75. The higher that number is, the more warped everything is, and the faster it appears to move.

The 'same grainy picture' comment was rude. She can do as she likes, just as you can. People shouldn't criticize someone who is confident with themselves enough to post millions of pictures, regardless of the quality of the images. If she wanted to, I'm sure she'd go out to GlamorShots and stun you all, but for the purpose of an internet thread, webcam images suffice. I think they're just fine, and I'm able to extract the proper color information out of them easily... What was once an image rich in blue is restored to the proper fleshy tones of her face.

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 9:50 am
by Geebs
Does that mean we're allowed to criticize someone who's neurotic enough to post millions of pictures?

On the other hand, having a stupid, socially retarded cunt of rep's magnitude in the thread has really put the mild wierdness of the photo threads and strange meandering posts about nothing much in perspective.

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 10:14 am
by rep
Geebs wrote:Does that mean we're allowed to criticize someone who's neurotic enough to post millions of pictures?

On the other hand, having a stupid, socially retarded cunt of rep's magnitude in the thread has really put the mild wierdness of the photo threads and strange meandering posts about nothing much in perspective.
Yeah,

As far as socially retarded cunt goes, I know you Brits have a different word for everything in your language, so that could be a compliment this week, yet was an insult last.

Along those lines, I hereby destroy your post by posing the following question. Is wierd the new cockney version of weird?

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 10:49 am
by LXS
rep wrote:
Geebs wrote:Does that mean we're allowed to criticize someone who's neurotic enough to post millions of pictures?

On the other hand, having a stupid, socially retarded cunt of rep's magnitude in the thread has really put the mild wierdness of the photo threads and strange meandering posts about nothing much in perspective.
Yeah,

As far as socially retarded cunt goes, I know you Brits have a different word for everything in your language, so that could be a compliment this week, yet was an insult last.

Along those lines, I hereby destroy your post by posing the following question. Is wierd the new cockney version of weird?
You're a total thrupney.

The result of a sherman.

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 3:22 pm
by SplishSplash
Kn0wFuRy wrote:
SplishSplash wrote:What's the pleasure in posting the same grainy, blurry, low-res pictures over and over again?
It amuses me. That is all the pleasure I need to have to do something. : )

And as far as everyone seeing enough.....good!!

Then just don't read my pic threads...."pic" is almost always in the subject line.
Oh Lord. You sure are amused easily.

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:32 pm
by Kn0wFuRy
SplishSplash wrote:
Kn0wFuRy wrote:
SplishSplash wrote:What's the pleasure in posting the same grainy, blurry, low-res pictures over and over again?
It amuses me. That is all the pleasure I need to have to do something. : )

And as far as everyone seeing enough.....good!!

Then just don't read my pic threads...."pic" is almost always in the subject line.
Oh Lord. You sure are amused easily.
I am. :)

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 5:43 pm
by Geebs
rep wrote:Yeah,

As far as socially retarded cunt goes, I know you Brits have a different word for everything in your language, so that could be a compliment this week, yet was an insult last.

Along those lines, I hereby destroy your post by posing the following question. Is wierd the new cockney version of weird?
Yeah, and tpyo is the new typo