Page 1 of 4

plained-like reasoning

Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 5:55 am
by Massive Quasars

Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:56 am
by seremtan
lol, american culture wars

Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:03 am
by Dave
I wonder if there's a reason why all ultra conservative women in the media are blonde

Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:25 am
by Massive Quasars
theories abound

Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:30 am
by feedback
Dave wrote:I wonder if there's a reason why all ultra conservative women in the media are blonde
:icon10: direct descendants of the aryans

Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:56 am
by Massive Quasars

Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 3:25 pm
by R00k
"I believe it is our moral responsibility to speak out against that kind of bigotry and prejudice every time we encounter it."

Edwards' campaign posted the video on their Web site, and asked readers to help them "raise $100,000 in 'Coulter Cash' this week to keep this campaign charging ahead and fight back against the politics of bigotry."
It's so wrong, we should post the video and see if we can make some money off of it. lol

Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 4:58 pm
by seremtan
Massive Quasars wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/03/04/coulter.edwards/index.html
anndolf cuntler :olo:

Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:02 pm
by SplishSplash
comments are great as usual
If he becomes President, everyone in the congress will soon be swearing by the shit manual known as koran, and we'll have sharia law everywhere. Its as simple as that - you don't need to be a genius to figure out. Look at Keith Ellison and Dearborn if you need proven examples.

Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:34 pm
by seremtan
lol, advanced wingnut moronics

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 9:38 am
by Turing
ahahahahahaha the shit manual known as Koran that is GENIUS

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 2:58 pm
by Underpants?
I kind of chuckled too but I don't know about genius--you may be still kind of high off last night's overdose on manly wild onions.

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:07 pm
by Underpants?
fucking lol
she called John Edwards a faggot.
I think I'm in love with this woman.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/03/05/ ... index.html

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:11 pm
by Nightshade
I'd like to clout that horse-faced cunt with a tire iron.

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:33 pm
by seremtan
anyone who can make Bill Kristol sound sane and reasonable deserves a beating

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:05 pm
by Underpants?
Nightshade wrote:I'd like to clout that horse-faced cunt with a tire iron.
ooh the angwy bawd hippo is angwier and bawder! :icon33:
I still haven't read a single full paragraph of this lanky blond faggot-dropper's, but I love her even more!
:olo:

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:06 pm
by R00k
She deserves to be raped by a giant, gay, deformed black man with an IQ of 80, and be forced to have the baby.

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:38 pm
by Nightshade
Underpants? wrote:
Nightshade wrote:I'd like to clout that horse-faced cunt with a tire iron.
ooh the angwy bawd hippo is angwier and bawder! :icon33:
I still haven't read a single full paragraph of this lanky blond faggot-dropper's, but I love her even more!
:olo:
Did you knock back a double shot of stupid juice this morning?

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 7:41 pm
by R00k
Verizon, Sallie May and Georgia-based NetBank want their ads pulled from Ann Coulter's website.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/03/05/ ... index.html

"Turn left?! Turn left?! Turn left to what, you stupid bitch?!"

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 7:49 pm
by R00k
Plenty of conservatives turning on her as well - ouch:

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp? ... 0305b.html
Speaking to an audience at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington on Friday, Coulter said, "I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word 'faggot,' so I ... can't really talk about Edwards."

[...]

The Christian Defense Coalition said Coulter had "diminished herself and her message."

[...]

"I'm sorry to see that Ann Coulter once again made certain news coverage of CPAC would be focused upon her instead of upon the conservative movement's goals and principles," Amy Ridenour, president of the National Center for Public Policy Research, said in a statement on the group's website.

[...]

At last year's event, Coulter used the term "raghead" twice in a speech, triggering accusations of racism.

Ridenour said the NCPPR last year had seriously considered withdrawing its co-sponsorship of CPAC because of the "raghead" comment.

"I had 90 percent decided to stop our co-sponsorship for CPAC 2007, but the sponsor seemed to be taking our concerns about Coulter's 2006 remarks seriously and with what seemed to us to be appropriate sympathy, so the National Center co-sponsored CPAC again this year," she said.

Ridenour accused Coulter of going "out of her way to use a nasty epithet," describing the term she used as "even more universally reviled than the derogatory term she hurled last year."

"It would be better, in my opinion, to not have a CPAC at all than to have one that presents conservatism as a hostile, people-hating ideology," she said. "We conservatives have enough trouble overcoming the false things that are said about us without paying for a platform upon which we shoot ourselves annually in the foot."
:olo:

I hope her political profile fades into obscurity faster than her physical one is.

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 8:56 pm
by seremtan
"diminished herself and her message."

so it's into minus figures now?

Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:34 am
by Massive Quasars
*jap-eye*

When will Malkin get her's?

Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:51 am
by Massive Quasars
Pulled from the Wiki entry on Ann Coulter:
During an episode of Politically Incorrect, she said: "I think [women] should be armed but should not vote... women have no capacity to understand how money is earned. They have a lot of ideas on how to spend it... it's always more money on education, more money on child care, more money on day care." [1] She also once said: "It would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact. In fact, in every presidential election since 1950 - except Goldwater in '64 - the Republican would have won, if only the men had voted." [2]
... and what of women being seen and not heard?

Re: plained-like reasoning

Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:52 am
by Captain
Massive Quasars wrote:plained-like reasoning
It's like trying to reason with a bag of shit headed towards you.

Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:03 pm
by Massive Quasars
It's not at all like that.