Page 1 of 5
New Comp
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 1:08 am
by Zerofactor
Shared this with the guys over there at Leetforum, thought I'd share with you guys as well, this is my new baby:
Case: Chenming Black Aluminum
H/d: 2 Western Digital Caviar 7200 RPM SATA 3.0gb/s
Processor: AMD Athlon 64 x2 6000+
Video: evga GeForce 8800GTS 320MB PCI-E x16
Mobo: MSI Neo-F AM2 nVidia nForce 550 MCP ATX
Memory: A-Data 2gb SDRAM DDR2 800
PSU: SeaSonic ATX12v 500W
Also, who here plays WoW and on what realm? I've a 64 Horde Undead Mage.
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 1:18 am
by Zerofactor
I plan on having maybe a few LEDs on the inside, but no need to go crazy, IMO.
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 1:24 am
by SOAPboy
I play WoW.. 70 UD Mage, 60 Orc hunter, 53 orc rogue, and some others..
Was hacked a few days ago. So only toon with gear is my rogue atm.
Whisperwind, with the carebear pve noobs.

Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 1:40 am
by Cory
Its good if that's all you can afford.
Pussy don't even have SLI
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 1:49 am
by JB
so long as it runs Quake and CnC 3 its all good
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 2:19 am
by stocktroll
intel currently has the best multi cores so use them
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 2:24 am
by Zerofactor
stocktroll wrote:intel currently has the best multi cores so use them
I prefer not to use Intel products, at the moment.
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:24 am
by Nightshade
What he means is that he works at Wal-Mart and can't afford them.
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:34 am
by Zerofactor
People are attracted to things that look horrid by default? Dunno man
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:43 am
by Zerofactor
lol I'm not Peter Griffin
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:52 am
by +JuggerNaut+
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:14 am
by bitWISE
Those hard drives seem a bit lame considering how badass the rest is. Nice machine though.
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:28 am
by Massive Quasars
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:45 am
by Sanction
That would make a great sig
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:20 am
by Denz
bitWISE wrote:Those hard drives seem a bit lame considering how badass the rest is. Nice machine though.
Correct, more like this:
WD CaviarĀ® SE16 7200 RPM next-generation SATA hard drives feature 16 MB cache for lightning-fast performance, cool and quiet operation and up to 500 GB of storage
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:23 am
by DiscoDave
Sweet machine, i know its already been said but I would go for Intel core 2 duo as its leading the dual core market at the moment
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:28 am
by Denz
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 9:25 am
by X-R-Cist
if you really wanted fast hard drives you would scrap SATA because its a piece of crap and go with this option...
Seagate Barracuda 10K.4 (ST 3146807LW), 147 GB, 10,000
rpm Hardrive with a Ultra320 SCSI host adapter
obviously not the best in storage so you would buy 4 or 6 and raid them.
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:15 am
by Foo
X-R-Cist wrote:if you really wanted fast hard drives you would scrap SATA because its a piece of crap and go with this option...
Seagate Barracuda 10K.4 (ST 3146807LW), 147 GB, 10,000
rpm Hardrive with a Ultra320 SCSI host adapter
obviously not the best in storage so you would buy 4 or 6 and raid them.
You need to move with the times. SCSI used to be the king but it's only holding its own in the server market now due to inertia, vendor lock-in, and all the usual corporate nonsense that keeps smart companies buying less-than-optimum products.
http://www.pugetsystems.com/articles.php?id=19
http://www.barefeats.com/hard35.html
This one does side with you in speed terms, but the cost vs benefit scale is truly ridiculous. For the same price, you just add more SATA drives to the stripe and it'll be faster.
Also, much of the speed boost from SCSI is down to not hogging CPU cycles. For the price you'd have to drop on a SCSI controller, you could spend an equivalent amount on a SATA controller and reap the same if not greater benefits, on cheaper and/or a greater number of drives:
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/Products ... bnails=yes
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:21 am
by MKJ
zeromoney

Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:36 am
by Sanction
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:49 am
by X-R-Cist
Foo wrote:X-R-Cist wrote:if you really wanted fast hard drives you would scrap SATA because its a piece of crap and go with this option...
Seagate Barracuda 10K.4 (ST 3146807LW), 147 GB, 10,000
rpm Hardrive with a Ultra320 SCSI host adapter
obviously not the best in storage so you would buy 4 or 6 and raid them.
You need to move with the times. SCSI used to be the king but it's only holding its own in the server market now due to inertia, vendor lock-in, and all the usual corporate nonsense that keeps smart companies buying less-than-optimum products.
http://www.pugetsystems.com/articles.php?id=19
http://www.barefeats.com/hard35.html
This one does side with you in speed terms, but the cost vs benefit scale is truly ridiculous. For the same price, you just add more SATA drives to the stripe and it'll be faster.
Also, much of the speed boost from SCSI is down to not hogging CPU cycles. For the price you'd have to drop on a SCSI controller, you could spend an equivalent amount on a SATA controller and reap the same if not greater benefits, on cheaper and/or a greater number of drives:
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/Products ... bnails=yes
yeah, i see where you are coming from with this, im stuck in a debate at work about the same thing. im a die hard SCSI freak and i will die with a SCSI controller in my coffin...
and yes you could get 2 sata drives for the cost of 1 SCSI one, but its hard to find a reliable manufacturer who provides high capacity, high speed and NCQ availability with SATA.
in saying that, these drives mentioned above dont even have NCQ and they have tiny 80gb platters, which most of the times smaller platters and bigger size = slower seek speeds.
However in saying that i dont do a whole lot of shopping for SATA or IDE drives, so maybe they are easy to find, i just havent been able to.
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:20 am
by busetibi
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
sushi?
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:41 am
by Denz
Sanction wrote:

Cases are a personal preference, I'm sure you would like something pink with a unicorn on the side or something like that.
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:50 am
by Denz
found a better hdd, this has 16mb cache
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6822144701
Western Digital Caviar SE16 WD5000AAKS 500GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive