Page 1 of 1

abcnews tries to punk ron paul...

Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 1:31 pm
by scared?
by not including him in a debate poll...after being pressured, check out the results...lol...america is dead... btw...lol...look at 2nd place...

http://alaskaintel.blogspot.com/2007/05 ... -abcs.html

http://abcnews.go.com/politics/beseenbe ... 88=4000000

Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 11:11 pm
by Dr_Watson
maybe the thought the poll would be too big if they included any names that were not explicitely given to them by the republican national comitee.

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 12:19 am
by scared?
maybe ur dumb for even suggesting that retarded tripe...

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 3:45 am
by Duhard
Image

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 4:25 am
by GhostThane
get over here Duhard I got a mission for you!

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 4:50 am
by mjrpes
When asked “yes” or “no” on the emotional issue of embryonic stem cell research funding, Paul remained consistent and constitutional, responding that “Programs like this are not authorized under the Constitution.” How Jeffersonian. How Goldwateresque.
How am I supposed to put one foot in front of the other, in order to create a "walking" motion so I may get from one place to the other, if it is not authorized under the constitution??

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 5:05 am
by Tsakali_
Duhard wrote:img...
wtf dude :olo:

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 6:51 am
by Massive Quasars
mjrpes wrote:
When asked “yes” or “no” on the emotional issue of embryonic stem cell research funding, Paul remained consistent and constitutional, responding that “Programs like this are not authorized under the Constitution.” How Jeffersonian. How Goldwateresque.
How am I supposed to put one foot in front of the other, in order to create a "walking" motion so I may get from one place to the other, if it is not authorized under the constitution??
limits on government, not on individuals

hella strict interpretation, but he's one for consistency

a gentleman and a scholar

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 6:59 am
by seremtan
mjrpes wrote:
When asked “yes” or “no” on the emotional issue of embryonic stem cell research funding, Paul remained consistent and constitutional, responding that “Programs like this are not authorized under the Constitution.” How Jeffersonian. How Goldwateresque.
How am I supposed to put one foot in front of the other, in order to create a "walking" motion so I may get from one place to the other, if it is not authorized under the constitution??
lol, are you european?

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 7:02 am
by Massive Quasars
this should be good.. but it won't

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 7:04 am
by mjrpes
seremtan wrote:
mjrpes wrote:
When asked “yes” or “no” on the emotional issue of embryonic stem cell research funding, Paul remained consistent and constitutional, responding that “Programs like this are not authorized under the Constitution.” How Jeffersonian. How Goldwateresque.
How am I supposed to put one foot in front of the other, in order to create a "walking" motion so I may get from one place to the other, if it is not authorized under the constitution??
lol, are you european?
lol